Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method, comprising: at a user equipment: determining a number of available spots to advertise carrier aggregation (CA) combinations to a network; determining a priority order for a plurality of bands that are part of the CA combinations; determining a list of the CA combinations based on the priority order; and transmitting a portion of the list of the CA combinations in the priority order to the network, wherein the portion corresponds to the number of available spots.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the priority order, comprises: determining a timing parameter for each of the bands based on how recent the user equipment was camped on each of the bands, wherein priority is given to the bands that have been most recently camped on.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the priority order, further comprises: determining a neighbor band for each of the bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the CA combinations include one of all bands available to the UE or only bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter and the neighbor bands.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the priority order is based on a number of component carriers used for the CA combinations.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the number of component carriers is one of four component carriers, three component carriers or two components carriers.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of bands are Long Term Evolution (LTE) bands.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the portion of the list is the entire list when a number of CA combinations is less than the number of available spots.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving a second list of CA combinations from the network; and adding the CA combinations on the second list to the list of CA combinations, wherein the CA combinations on the second list have a highest priority.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the list is location dependent and the user equipment determines a further list of CA combinations based on the user equipment being disposed in a different location from a location where the list of CA combinations was determined.
11. A user equipment, comprising: a transceiver configured to connect the user equipment to a network, the user equipment and the network configured for a carrier aggregation (CA) functionality; and a processor determining a number of available spots to advertise CA combinations to the network, the processor determining a priority order for a plurality of Long Term Evolution (LTE) bands that are part of the CA combinations, the processor determining a list of the CA combinations based on the priority order, wherein the transceiver transmits a portion of the list of the CA combinations in the priority order to the network, wherein the portion corresponds to the number of available spots.
12. The user equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processor determines the priority order by determining a timing parameter for each of the LTE bands based on how recent the user equipment was camped on each of the LTE bands, wherein priority is given to the LTE bands that have been most recently camped on.
13. The user equipment of claim 12 , wherein the processor further determines the priority order by determining a neighbor LTE band for each of the LTE bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter.
14. The user equipment of claim 13 , wherein the CA combinations include one of all LTE bands available to the UE or only LTE bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter and the neighbor bands.
15. The user equipment of claim 13 , wherein when the processor determines that the user equipment is one of near an edge of the network, has a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) value that is lower than a threshold or that a registration procedure for the network has failed a number of times greater than a threshold, the processor includes only bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter and the neighbor bands in the list of CA combinations.
16. The user equipment of claim 11 , wherein the processor determines the priority order based on a number of component carriers used for the CA combinations.
17. The user equipment of claim 11 , wherein the user equipment receives a second list of CA combinations from the network and the processor adds the CA combinations on the second list to the list of CA combinations, wherein the CA combinations on the second list have a highest priority.
18. An integrated circuit, comprising: circuitry configured to determine a number of available spots to advertise carrier aggregation (CA) combinations to a network; circuitry configured to determine a priority order for a plurality of bands that are part of the CA combinations; circuitry configured to determine a list of the CA combinations based on the priority order; and circuitry to determine a portion of the list of the CA combinations in the priority order that is to be transmitted to the network, wherein the portion corresponds to the number of available spots.
19. The integrated circuit of claim 18 , wherein the circuitry configured to determine the priority order comprises: circuitry configured to determine a timing parameter for each of the bands based on how recent the user equipment was camped on each of the bands, wherein priority is given to the bands that have been most recently camped on.
20. The integrated circuit of claim 19 , wherein the circuitry configured to determine the priority order further comprises: circuitry configured to determine a neighbor band for each of the bands that have been determined to have priority based on the timing parameter.
Unknown
December 4, 2018
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.