System and Process for Evaluating and Validating Additive Manufacturing Operations

1. A method of evaluating and validating additive manufacturing operations comprising: generating a multidimensional space defined by a plurality of bounds, each of said bounds being defined on a distinct parameter of an additive manufacturing process and being expressed as a corresponding mathematical function of at least two shared variables, each of said parameters being a dimension in a multi-dimensional coordinate system, at least one of the corresponding mathematical functions being determined via a computer simulation; determining a coordinate position of at least one additive manufacturing operation within the multi-dimensional coordinate system; and categorizing the operation as flaw free when the coordinate position is within the multi-dimensional space.

2. A method of evaluating and validating additive manufacturing operations comprising: generating a multidimensional space defined by a plurality of bounds, each of said bounds being defined on a distinct parameter of an additive manufacturing process and being expressed as a corresponding mathematical function of at least two shared variables, each of said parameters being a dimension in a multi-dimensional coordinate system, at least one of the corresponding mathematical functions being determined via a computer simulation; determining a coordinate position of at least one additive manufacturing operation within the multi-dimensional coordinate system; and categorizing the operation as flaw free when the coordinate position is within the multi-dimensional space; and wherein at least one of the parameters is partially unbounded.

3. An additive manufacturing apparatus comprising: a chamber; a platform within said chamber; and a controller, the controlling including a processor and a memory, the memory storing instructions for causing the processor to validate at least one input operation by determining a multi-dimensional coordinate in response to receiving the at least one input operation, and comparing the multi-dimensional coordinate to a stored multi-dimensional space, wherein the stored multi-dimensional space is defined by a plurality of bounds, each of said bounds being defined on a distinct parameter of an additive manufacturing process and being expressed as a corresponding mathematical function of at least two shared variables, each of said parameters being a dimension in a multi-dimensional coordinate system, at least one of the corresponding mathematical functions being determined via simulation, and at least one of the parameters is partially unbounded.

4. The additive manufacturing apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the chamber further includes a powder bed fusion apparatus.

5. The additive manufacturing apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the powder bed fusion apparatus is a laser powder bed fusion apparatus.

6. The additive manufacturing apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the powder bed fusion apparatus is an electron beam powder bed fusion apparatus.

7. The additive manufacturing apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the memory further stores instructions for rejecting the at least one input operation in response to the determined multi-dimensional coordinate falling outside the multi-dimensional space.

8. The additive manufacturing apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the multi-dimensional space is a space having four or more dimensions, and wherein each of said dimensions includes at least one bound corresponding to an operational parameter of an additive manufacturing process.

9. A method of evaluating and validating additive manufacturing operations comprising: generating a multidimensional space defined by a plurality of bounds, each of said bounds being defined on a distinct parameter of an additive manufacturing process, each of said parameters being a dimension in a multi-dimensional coordinate system, and at least one of the parameters being partially unbounded; determining a coordinate position of at least one additive manufacturing operation within the multi-dimensional coordinate system; and categorizing the operation as flaw free when the coordinate position is within the multi-dimensional space.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein a flaw free operation is an additive manufacturing operation where flaws in a resultant work piece are below an acceptable threshold.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the parameters includes at least twenty parameters.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein each of said bounds are expressed as a corresponding mathematical function of at least two shared variables, and wherein the at least two shared variables are a laser beam power and a scanning velocity.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein each of said parameters is normalized to each other of said parameters.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein each of said bounds are expressed as a corresponding mathematical function of at least two shared variables, and wherein at least one of the mathematical functions is a least partially empirically determined.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising creating a work piece by causing an additive manufacturing machine to perform the at least one additive manufacturing operation in response to categorizing the at least one additive manufacturing operation as flaw free.

16. The method of claim 9 , where at least one of the parameters is fully bounded.

17. The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least one additive manufacturing operation is a sequence of additive manufacturing operations.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the sequence of additive manufacturing operations is an ordered list of all operations required to create a part.