10553040

Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Telematics Security Through Secondary Channel

PublishedFebruary 4, 2020
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
20 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.

Claim 1

Original Legal Text

1. A system comprising: a processor configured to: wirelessly receive a vehicle system command from a remote source over a first communication channel; responsive to receiving the command, open a second communication channel with an apparent command-originating source; request, over the second communication channel, verification that the command originated from the apparent command-originating source; and execute the command responsive to command-origin verification.

Plain English translation pending...
Claim 2

Original Legal Text

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the apparent command-originating source is a previously stored known source of commands.

Plain English Translation

A system for command authentication and verification in electronic devices identifies and validates the apparent origin of commands to prevent unauthorized access. The system compares the apparent command-originating source against a database of previously stored known sources of commands. If the source matches an entry in the database, the command is authenticated as legitimate. This prevents unauthorized commands from being executed by verifying that the source is recognized and trusted. The system may include a command input module to receive commands, a source identification module to determine the apparent origin of each command, and a verification module to compare the identified source against the stored database. The database of known sources can be updated dynamically to include new trusted sources or remove outdated entries. This approach enhances security by ensuring only commands from verified sources are processed, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or malicious attacks. The system is particularly useful in environments where command integrity is critical, such as industrial control systems, network security, or user authentication processes.

Claim 3

Original Legal Text

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the apparent command-originating source is identified as part of data received in conjunction with the command.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to a system for identifying the origin of commands in a computing environment, addressing the challenge of determining the true source of a command when multiple systems or users may be involved in its transmission. The system enhances security and accountability by verifying the apparent command-originating source, which is embedded within the data received alongside the command. This allows the system to distinguish between the actual originator and any intermediate relays or proxies that may have forwarded the command. The system processes the command and its associated metadata to authenticate the source, ensuring that commands are only executed when they originate from authorized entities. This verification step helps prevent unauthorized access, spoofing, or command injection attacks, improving the reliability and security of command execution in distributed or multi-user environments. The system may be applied in networked systems, cloud computing, or any scenario where command integrity and source verification are critical. By analyzing the command-originating source data, the system ensures that only legitimate commands are processed, reducing the risk of malicious or unintended actions.

Claim 4

Original Legal Text

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the command includes a request to control a vehicle system.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to a system for controlling vehicle systems via commands. The system includes a processor and a memory storing instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to receive a command from a user or another system. The command includes a request to control a specific vehicle system, such as the engine, braking system, steering, or infotainment system. The processor processes the command and generates a control signal to adjust the operation of the requested vehicle system. The system may also include communication interfaces to transmit the control signal to the vehicle system or to other components that interface with the vehicle system. The system may further include authentication mechanisms to verify the authority of the command before executing it. The invention aims to provide secure and efficient remote or automated control of vehicle systems, improving functionality and user experience. The system may be integrated into the vehicle's onboard computer or operate as an external device connected to the vehicle. The invention addresses challenges in vehicle control, such as ensuring secure access and reliable execution of commands to maintain vehicle safety and performance.

Claim 5

Original Legal Text

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the command includes a request to access vehicle data.

Plain English Translation

A system for vehicle data access control manages authorization and retrieval of vehicle data from a vehicle's onboard computer. The system includes a vehicle interface module that communicates with the onboard computer to request and receive vehicle data, such as sensor readings, diagnostic information, or operational status. A user interface module allows external devices, such as smartphones or diagnostic tools, to submit commands to the system. These commands may include requests to access specific vehicle data. An authorization module verifies whether the requesting device or user has permission to access the requested data, enforcing security policies to prevent unauthorized access. If authorized, the system retrieves the requested data from the onboard computer and transmits it to the requesting device. The system ensures secure and controlled access to vehicle data, addressing concerns about unauthorized data retrieval and ensuring only authorized users or devices can obtain sensitive vehicle information. This improves vehicle security and data privacy while enabling legitimate access for diagnostics, maintenance, or user monitoring.

Claim 6

Original Legal Text

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the command includes a request to configure a vehicle system.

Plain English Translation

A system for managing vehicle operations includes a communication interface that receives a command from a remote source, such as a server or user device, to control or configure a vehicle system. The command may include instructions to adjust settings, activate features, or modify operational parameters of the vehicle. The system processes the command and transmits it to the appropriate vehicle subsystem, such as the powertrain, infotainment, or safety system, to execute the requested configuration. This allows remote updates, diagnostics, or customization of vehicle functions without physical access to the vehicle. The system ensures secure communication and authentication to prevent unauthorized access. The invention addresses the need for remote management of vehicle systems, improving convenience, efficiency, and security in vehicle operations.

Claim 7

Original Legal Text

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to send command data, related to the vehicle system command, as part of the verification request.

Plain English Translation

A system for vehicle command verification includes a processor that receives a vehicle system command from a user device and generates a verification request to confirm the command's validity. The processor sends command data, related to the vehicle system command, as part of the verification request to ensure the command is authorized and properly formatted. The system may also include a communication interface for transmitting the verification request to a remote server or another vehicle component. The remote server or component evaluates the command data to determine if the command should be executed. If verified, the processor executes the command, which may involve controlling vehicle functions such as locking doors, adjusting climate settings, or activating safety features. The system enhances security by preventing unauthorized or malformed commands from being executed, reducing the risk of vehicle tampering or unintended operations. The processor may also log verification results for auditing and troubleshooting purposes. This system is particularly useful in connected vehicles where remote commands are frequently issued, ensuring that only legitimate commands are processed.

Claim 8

Original Legal Text

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the command data includes a timestamp.

Plain English Translation

A system for managing and processing command data in a computing environment addresses the challenge of tracking and verifying the timing of commands within a distributed system. The system includes a command processor that receives and executes commands from multiple sources, such as user inputs or automated processes. The command data, which includes instructions for system operations, is stored in a data repository for retrieval and analysis. To enhance traceability and synchronization, the command data includes a timestamp indicating when the command was generated or received. This timestamp allows the system to sequence commands chronologically, resolve conflicts, and ensure consistency across distributed components. The inclusion of timestamps in command data enables auditing, debugging, and performance monitoring by providing a precise record of when commands were processed. The system may also include a validation module to verify the integrity and authenticity of the command data, ensuring that only authorized and valid commands are executed. By integrating timestamps into command data, the system improves reliability and accountability in command processing, particularly in environments where timing and order of operations are critical.

Claim 9

Original Legal Text

9. A system comprising: a processor configured to: request origin verification of a control command wirelessly received over a first channel, over a second channel established with an apparent origin responsive to receipt of the control command; and execute the control command upon verification from the apparent origin.

Plain English Translation

This system operates in the domain of wireless command and control systems, addressing security vulnerabilities in wireless communication where unauthorized entities may send malicious control commands. The system enhances security by verifying the origin of received commands before execution. A processor receives a control command over a first wireless channel and, in response, establishes a second wireless channel with the apparent origin of the command. Over this second channel, the processor requests verification of the command's origin. If the apparent origin confirms the command's legitimacy, the processor executes the command. This dual-channel verification process ensures that only authenticated sources can issue executable commands, mitigating risks of spoofing or unauthorized access. The system is particularly useful in environments where wireless control commands are critical, such as industrial automation, smart home systems, or vehicle control, where security breaches could lead to significant operational or safety risks. The second channel may use a different protocol or frequency to further enhance security, preventing interception or replay attacks. The verification process may involve cryptographic challenges or other authentication mechanisms to confirm the command's origin.

Claim 10

Original Legal Text

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the apparent origin is identified by data received with the control command.

Plain English Translation

**Technical Summary for Prior Art Search** This invention relates to systems for identifying the apparent origin of control commands in networked environments, particularly in scenarios where command sources may be obscured or spoofed. The problem addressed is the difficulty in determining the true origin of control commands, which is critical for security, authentication, and operational integrity in distributed systems. The system includes a networked device configured to receive control commands from one or more sources. A processing module analyzes these commands to determine their apparent origin, which is derived from data embedded within or transmitted alongside the command. This data may include metadata, source identifiers, or other indicators that help distinguish legitimate commands from potentially malicious or spoofed ones. The system may also include verification mechanisms to cross-check the apparent origin against known trusted sources or historical command patterns. Additionally, the system may incorporate a logging or reporting module to record command origins for auditing or forensic analysis. This ensures traceability and accountability in command execution. The invention is particularly useful in industrial control systems, IoT networks, or any environment where command authenticity is critical for safety and security. The key innovation lies in leveraging embedded data within control commands to infer their origin, reducing reliance on external verification methods and improving response times in dynamic networked environments.

Claim 11

Original Legal Text

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the apparent origin is a previously stored known source of control commands.

Plain English Translation

Technical Summary: This invention relates to systems for detecting and mitigating unauthorized control commands in industrial or networked environments. The problem addressed is the risk of malicious or spoofed control commands being injected into systems, potentially causing operational disruptions or security breaches. The system identifies the apparent origin of control commands and compares them against a database of known, legitimate sources to determine authenticity. The system includes a monitoring module that intercepts control commands directed at a target device or system. It analyzes metadata or signal characteristics to determine the apparent origin of each command. A verification module then checks this origin against a pre-populated database of authorized sources, which may include previously stored known sources of control commands. If the origin does not match any authorized source, the system flags the command as potentially malicious and may block or quarantine it. The system may also log the event for further analysis. The database of known sources can be dynamically updated to include new authorized sources or remove deprecated ones, ensuring the system adapts to changing network conditions. This approach enhances security by preventing unauthorized control commands from reaching critical systems, reducing the risk of cyberattacks or operational errors. The system is particularly useful in industrial control systems, networked devices, or any environment where command integrity is critical.

Claim 12

Original Legal Text

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the control command includes a request to control a vehicle system.

Plain English Translation

A system for managing vehicle operations includes a control module that generates and transmits control commands to various vehicle systems. The control module processes input data, such as sensor readings or user instructions, to determine the appropriate actions for the vehicle. The system ensures that the control commands are executed in a coordinated manner to maintain vehicle safety and performance. In one configuration, the control command specifically targets a vehicle system, such as the engine, braking system, or steering mechanism, to adjust its operation based on real-time conditions. The system may also include communication interfaces to relay commands between different vehicle components or external devices. By dynamically adjusting vehicle system parameters, the system enhances efficiency, safety, and responsiveness in various driving scenarios. The control module may prioritize commands based on urgency or system criticality to prevent conflicts and ensure smooth operation. This approach allows for adaptive vehicle control, improving overall system reliability and user experience.

Claim 13

Original Legal Text

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the control command includes a request to access vehicle data.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to a vehicle control system that enables secure and authorized access to vehicle data. The system addresses the challenge of managing and protecting vehicle data while allowing authorized entities to retrieve specific information for diagnostics, maintenance, or other purposes. The system includes a vehicle control unit that processes control commands from external devices, such as mobile applications or diagnostic tools. These commands may include requests to access vehicle data, such as sensor readings, operational status, or historical performance metrics. The control unit verifies the authenticity and authorization of the request before granting access, ensuring that only permitted users or systems can retrieve the data. The system also includes a communication interface to facilitate secure data transmission between the vehicle and external devices. By implementing this system, vehicle manufacturers and service providers can maintain data security while enabling efficient access for authorized users. The invention improves data management in vehicles by combining secure authentication with flexible access control mechanisms.

Claim 14

Original Legal Text

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the control command includes a request to configure a vehicle system.

Plain English Translation

A system for managing vehicle operations includes a control module that generates and transmits control commands to various vehicle subsystems. The control commands are used to configure or adjust the operation of vehicle systems, such as powertrain, braking, steering, or infotainment systems. The control module may receive input from sensors, user interfaces, or external sources to determine the appropriate configuration for the vehicle system. The system ensures that the vehicle operates according to predefined parameters, user preferences, or dynamic conditions. The control module may also validate the control commands before transmission to ensure compatibility with the target vehicle system. This system enhances vehicle performance, safety, and user experience by enabling dynamic adjustments to vehicle functions based on real-time data or user inputs.

Claim 15

Original Legal Text

15. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving a command origin verification request, to verify a command wirelessly received by a vehicle, over a wireless communication channel at a remote command originating source; receiving command-identifying data, as part of the verification request, relating to the command; determining if the command was sent from the remote command originating source, based on the command-identifying data; and verifying the command origin as the remote command originating source, contingent upon the determining.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to a computer-implemented method for verifying the origin of wireless commands sent to a vehicle. The problem addressed is ensuring that commands received by a vehicle over a wireless communication channel are legitimate and originate from an authorized source, preventing unauthorized or malicious command execution. The method involves receiving a verification request to confirm the origin of a wirelessly received vehicle command. The request includes command-identifying data, which is analyzed to determine whether the command was indeed sent from the specified remote source. If the analysis confirms the command's origin, the command is verified as legitimate. This process helps prevent unauthorized access or control of the vehicle by ensuring only commands from trusted sources are accepted. The method may involve additional steps, such as validating the command-identifying data against stored records or cryptographic signatures to authenticate the source. By verifying the command origin before execution, the system enhances vehicle security against spoofing or hijacking attacks. This approach is particularly useful in connected vehicles where remote commands are frequently used for functions like unlocking, starting the engine, or software updates. The invention ensures that only authorized entities can issue such commands, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or manipulation.

Claim 16

Original Legal Text

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the command-identifying data includes a timestamp.

Plain English Translation

A system and method for processing commands in a computing environment involves identifying and executing commands based on command-identifying data. The system receives a command from a user or another system, extracts command-identifying data from the command, and uses this data to determine the appropriate action to take. The command-identifying data may include metadata such as a timestamp, which indicates when the command was issued or received. The timestamp allows the system to track the sequence of commands, prioritize execution based on time, or filter commands based on their age. The system then processes the command according to the identified action, which may involve executing a function, modifying system settings, or triggering a workflow. The method ensures that commands are accurately interpreted and executed in a controlled manner, improving system reliability and efficiency. The inclusion of a timestamp in the command-identifying data enhances command tracking and management, particularly in environments where command timing is critical.

Claim 17

Original Legal Text

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the command-identifying data includes data identifying the vehicle.

Plain English Translation

A system and method for processing vehicle commands involves receiving command-identifying data from a vehicle, where this data includes information that uniquely identifies the vehicle. The system extracts the vehicle identification data from the command-identifying data to determine the specific vehicle associated with the command. This identification allows the system to authenticate the vehicle, verify its authorization to issue the command, and process the command accordingly. The command may be related to vehicle operations, such as remote access, diagnostics, or control functions. The vehicle identification data ensures that commands are only processed for authorized vehicles, enhancing security and preventing unauthorized access. The system may also log the command and the associated vehicle identification data for record-keeping and auditing purposes. This method improves the reliability and security of vehicle command processing by ensuring that only legitimate commands from identified vehicles are executed.

Claim 18

Original Legal Text

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the command-identifying data includes command content.

Plain English Translation

A system and method for processing command-identifying data in a computing environment involves analyzing command content to determine the nature of a command. The method includes receiving a command from a user or application, extracting command-identifying data from the command, and analyzing the command content within the command-identifying data to determine the specific action or operation the command represents. This analysis may involve parsing the command structure, identifying keywords, or evaluating metadata associated with the command. The system may then execute the command or forward it to another processing module based on the analysis. The method ensures accurate interpretation of commands by leveraging the command content to distinguish between different types of commands, such as system commands, application commands, or user-defined commands. This approach improves command processing efficiency and reduces errors in command execution by providing a detailed understanding of the command's intent. The system may also log command content for auditing or debugging purposes, enhancing system reliability and security. The method is applicable in various computing environments, including operating systems, software applications, and networked systems, where precise command interpretation is critical.

Claim 19

Original Legal Text

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the determining includes checking a history of sent commands to determine if the command is contained in the history and was sent to the vehicle.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to vehicle command systems, specifically addressing the challenge of preventing duplicate or redundant command transmissions to a vehicle. The system monitors and tracks commands sent to a vehicle to avoid unnecessary or conflicting instructions. The method involves determining whether a new command should be executed by checking a history of previously sent commands. If the command is found in the history and was already sent to the vehicle, the system prevents redundant transmission. This ensures efficient communication and reduces processing overhead. The system may also include a user interface for displaying command status and history, allowing users to review past commands and their outcomes. The method may further involve prioritizing commands based on urgency or relevance, ensuring critical instructions are processed first. The system can be integrated with vehicle control systems to manage command execution and prevent conflicts. This approach enhances reliability and responsiveness in vehicle command processing.

Claim 20

Original Legal Text

20. The method of claim 15 , wherein the determining includes checking a history of communication to determine if communication was sent at a time corresponding to a timestamp included with the command-identifying data.

Plain English Translation

This invention relates to systems for verifying the authenticity and integrity of commands in a communication network, particularly in environments where unauthorized or tampered commands could disrupt operations. The problem addressed is ensuring that commands received by a device or system are legitimate, timely, and have not been altered or injected by malicious actors. The method involves analyzing command-identifying data associated with a received command to verify its authenticity. This includes checking a history of communications to confirm whether the command was sent at a time that matches a timestamp embedded in the command-identifying data. By comparing the timestamp with the actual transmission time recorded in the communication history, the system can detect discrepancies that may indicate tampering or unauthorized access. The method may also involve validating the command-identifying data against a predefined set of criteria, such as cryptographic signatures or predefined command formats, to further ensure its legitimacy. If the verification fails, the command is rejected to prevent potential security breaches. This approach enhances security by preventing unauthorized or outdated commands from being executed, thereby protecting the integrity and reliability of the communication network.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

February 4, 2020

Inventors

Oliver LEI
Allen R. MURRAY

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, FAQs, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED TELEMATICS SECURITY THROUGH SECONDARY CHANNEL” (10553040). https://patentable.app/patents/10553040

© 2026 Nomic Interactive Technology LLC. Machine-readable context available at /api/llm-context/10553040. See llms.txt for full attribution policy.