Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein where the second type of motion detection is stricter than the first type of motion detection.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first type of motion detection employs a higher threshold for pixel comparison in areas of higher luminance.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the regions around the saved faces are bigger than the saved detected faces.
10. The videoconferencing endpoint of claim 9, wherein where the second type of motion detection is stricter than the first type of motion detection.
11. The videoconferencing endpoint of claim 8, wherein the first type of motion detection employs a higher threshold for pixel comparison in areas of higher luminance.
14. The videoconferencing endpoint of claim 8, wherein the regions around the saved faces are bigger than the saved detected faces.
17. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 16, wherein where the second type of motion detection is stricter than the first type of motion detection.
18. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 15, wherein the first type of motion detection employs a higher threshold for pixel comparison in areas of higher luminance.
21. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 15, wherein the regions around the saved faces are bigger than the saved detected faces.
Unknown
September 6, 2022
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.