11651263

Nonlinear Calibration of a Quantum Computing Apparatus

PublishedMay 16, 2023
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
13 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

2

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the revised physical model to model a behavior of the system of superconducting qubits.

4

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the system of superconducting qubits comprises a quantum annealer circuit.

6

6. The method of claim 1, wherein defining the physical model comprises applying experimental techniques to estimate the at least one model parameter.

8

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining gradients of the cost function with respect to the at least one model parameter comprises applying matrix perturbation theory.

9

9. The method of claim 8, wherein applying matrix perturbation theory comprises using eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian matrix included in the physical model.

10

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the Hamiltonian matrix included in the physical model comprises an effective Hamiltonian describing interactions between the superconducting qubits.

11

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the effective Hamiltonian is defined using a physical approximation.

12

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the Hamiltonian matrix included in the physical model describes more interacting components than the effective Hamiltonian.

13

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the observable comprises Hamiltonians describing the system of superconducting qubits for respective configurations of control biases, and wherein the set of experimental data comprises measured energy spectrum values of the system of superconducting qubits for respective configurations of control biases.

14

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the set of predictive data comprises predicted energy spectrum values of the system of superconducting qubits for respective configurations of control biases.

15

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the superconducting qubits comprise flux qubits.

16

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the control biases comprise voltages or currents.

17

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one model parameter comprises a physical parameter defining the system of superconducting qubits.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

May 16, 2023

Inventors

John Martinis
Yu Chen
Hartmut Neven
Dvir Kafri

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “NONLINEAR CALIBRATION OF A QUANTUM COMPUTING APPARATUS” (11651263). https://patentable.app/patents/11651263

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.