Techniques for Redundant Access Rule Management

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein in response to determining that the access request rejection rate does not satisfy the rule reduction parameters, adjusting, automatically by the server computer, clustering parameters for clustering the access requests.

5. The method according to claim 3, wherein a clustering parameter comprises a number of clusters to be generated.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the performance rank is a numerical value representing a ranking of an access rule in relation to other access rules in the first subset of access rules.

9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising, prior to determining the first cluster from the plurality of clusters, performing cluster modeling to determine a co-triggering pattern of access rules associated with the access requests.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first trigger percentage is greater than 50%.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first cluster has a highest coverage triggering percentage from among the plurality of clusters.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the recommendation comprises at one of consolidating the first access rule and the second access rule, removing at least one of the first access rule and the second access rule, or monitoring the first access rule and the second access rule.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein in response to the performance rank of the first access rule and the second access rule being within a predetermined range of each other, consolidating the first access rule and the second access rule.

14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the recommendation comprises a report that is displayed on an interactive user interface.

15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the action comprises removing the first access rule or removing the second access rule.