Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
3. The UE of claim 2, wherein the interference detection unit controls the UE to be in an avoiding state against the IDC interference based on the response.
4. The UE of claim 2, wherein the coordination of the IDC interference is based on Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) or Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).
5. The UE of claim 1, wherein the measurement values are calculated using measurement samples obtained in a non-interference interval where the DC interference does not occur.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein, transmitting the measurement report is performed after receiving the response.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the coordination of the IDC interference is based on Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) or Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).
10. The method of claim 6, wherein the measurement values are calculated using measurement samples obtained in a non-interference interval where the IDC interference does not occur.
13. The eNB of claim 12, wherein the coordination of the IDC interference is based on Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) or Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).
14. The eNB of claim 11, wherein the measurement values are calculated using measurement samples obtained in a non-interference interval where the DC interference does not occur.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the coordination of the IDC interference is based on Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) or Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the measurement values are calculated using measurement samples obtained in a non-interference interval where the IDC interference does not occur.
Unknown
November 7, 2023
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.