11818715

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Codebook Design for a Sidelink

PublishedNovember 14, 2023
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
18 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

2

2. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the first UE and the second UE are associated with a carrier aggregation configuration, and wherein the HARQ feedback relates to a plurality of carriers of the carrier aggregation configuration.

3

3. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the triggering signal is associated with information indicating a feedback resource for the HARQ feedback, and wherein the HARQ feedback is transmitted on the feedback resource.

4

4. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the HARQ feedback is transmitted via a sidelink shared channel.

5

5. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the HARQ feedback relates to each sidelink HARQ process associated with a source identifier of the second UE and to each carrier between the first UE and the second UE.

6

6. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the HARQ feedback is provided in a communication that includes a flag indicating that the communication includes the HARQ feedback.

9

9. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the HARQ feedback includes one HARQ codebook per unicast link of the first UE and one HARQ codebook per groupcast link of the first UE.

10

10. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the HARQ feedback includes one HARQ codebook per source identifier of the first UE.

12

12. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the SCI includes a bit indicating that the SCI includes or is the triggering signal.

15

15. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the triggering signal includes information indicating a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) resource for the HARQ feedback.

16

16. The first UE of claim 1, wherein the sidelink shared channel is a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH).

18

18. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the first UE and the second UE are associated with a carrier aggregation configuration, and wherein the HARQ feedback relates to a plurality of carriers of the carrier aggregation configuration.

19

19. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the triggering signal is relayed via the first UE from a base station.

20

20. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the triggering signal is associated with information indicating a feedback resource for the HARQ feedback, and wherein the HARQ feedback is transmitted on the feedback resource.

21

21. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the HARQ feedback relates to each sidelink HARQ process associated with a source identifier of the first UE and to each carrier between the first UE and the second UE.

22

22. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the HARQ feedback is received in a communication that includes a flag indicating that the communication includes the HARQ feedback.

24

24. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the HARQ feedback includes one HARQ codebook per unicast link of the first UE and one HARQ codebook per groupcast link of the first UE.

26

26. The first UE of claim 17, wherein the sidelink shared channel is a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH).

28

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the SCI includes a bit indicating that the sidelink control information includes or is the triggering signal.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

November 14, 2023

Inventors

Seyedkianoush HOSSEINI
Wei YANG
Wanshi CHEN
Juan MONTOJO

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST CODEBOOK DESIGN FOR A SIDELINK” (11818715). https://patentable.app/patents/11818715

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.