Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of network nodes comprises a first subset of network nodes that are at fixed geographic locations and a second subset of network nodes that are mobile within a geographic region of service, and wherein each network node in the plurality of network nodes is configured to directly communicate wirelessly with network nodes in the first subset and the second subset.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a network node that is mobile is configured with interface circuitry for communicating with sensors of a vehicle transporting the network node.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the data validation techniques in the subset are identified using a designated portion of a collection of configuration parameters that corresponds to the first network node.
5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining whether the data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the data using a configuration parameter from a collection that represents one or both of a delay tolerance and a periodicity of sending of the data.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first procedure comprises forwarding the received data to a second network node.
7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining whether the received data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the received data according to characteristics of the first data communication interface.
9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein the plurality of network nodes comprises a first subset of network nodes that are at fixed geographic locations and a second subset of network nodes that are mobile within a geographic region of service, and wherein each network node in the plurality of network nodes is configured to directly communicate wirelessly with network nodes in the first subset and the second subset.
10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein a network node that is mobile is configured with interface circuitry for communicating with sensors of a vehicle transporting the network node.
11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein the data validation techniques in the subset are identified using a designated portion of a collection of configuration parameters that corresponds to the first network node.
12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein the steps of the method further comprise determining whether the data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the data using a configuration parameter from a collection that represent one or both of a delay tolerance and a periodicity of sending the data.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein the first procedure comprises forwarding the received data to a second network node.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 8, wherein the steps of the method further comprise determining whether the received data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the received data according to characteristics of the first data communication interface.
16. The system according to claim 15, wherein the plurality of network nodes comprises a first subset of network nodes that are at fixed geographic locations and a second subset of network nodes that are mobile within a geographic region of service, and wherein each network node in the plurality of network nodes is configured to directly communicate wirelessly with network nodes in the first subset and the second subset.
17. The system according to claim 15, wherein a network node that is mobile is configured with interface circuitry for communicating with sensors of a vehicle transporting the network node.
18. The system according to claim 15, wherein the data validation techniques in the subset are identified using a designated portion of a collection of configuration parameters that corresponds to the first network node.
19. The system according to claim 15, wherein the one or more processors are operable to determine whether the data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the data using a configuration parameter from a collection that represent one or both of a delay tolerance and a periodicity of sending the data.
20. The system according to claim 15, wherein the first procedure comprises forwarding the received data to a second network node.
21. The system according to claim 15, wherein the one or more processors are operable to determine whether the received data is valid by applying the data validation techniques in the identified subset to the received data using characteristics of the first data communication interface.
Unknown
January 2, 2024
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.