Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein comparing the one or more parameter values further includes comparing at least one of an observed modulation and coding scheme (MCS), one or more log likelihood ratios (LLRs), an observed signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR), a bit error rate (BER), a block-error rate (BLER), of the one or more downlink data transmissions to the one or more threshold values.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to receive, from the base station, a configuration indicating the one or more threshold values.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the indication to the base station along with hybrid automatic repeat/request (HARQ) feedback.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the indication further based on determining that a feature for transmitting SRS without a command from the base station is enabled.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more downlink data transmissions include multiple downlink data transmissions, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the SRS based on comparing the one or more parameter values of the multiple downlink data transmissions to the one or more threshold values.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the SRS based on the one or more parameter values of at least a threshold number of the multiple downlink data transmissions being at least at the one or more threshold values.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to receive, from the base station, a configuration indicating at least one of the threshold number of the multiple downlink data transmissions or a number representing the multiple downlink data transmissions.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to receive a configuration indicating a time period after which to transmit the SRS to the base station, and wherein transmitting the SRS comprises transmitting the SRS to the base station over the uplink resources occurring after the time period from receiving the one or more downlink data transmissions.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein comparing the one or more parameter values includes comparing at least one of a number of negative acknowledged code blocks (CBs), a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBs over a total number of CBs, a number of negative acknowledged code block groups (CBGs), or a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBGs over a total number of CBGs, of the one or more downlink data transmissions to the one or more threshold values.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the SRS on a same bandwidth part (BWP) of the one or more downlink data transmissions.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the SRS based on a first configuration that is different from a second configuration received from the base station that configures transmission of aperiodic SRS.
13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more downlink data transmissions are received in resources of one or more dynamic grants or a same semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration.
14. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more downlink data transmissions include at least a first downlink data transmission received in first resources of a first semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration and at least a second downlink data transmission received in second resources of a second SPS configuration.
15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more downlink data transmissions further include at least a third downlink data transmission received in third resources of a dynamic grant.
16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to receive, from a base station, an indication to compare, to the one or more threshold values, the one or more parameter values of either downlink data transmissions received in resources of a same semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration or downlink data transmissions received in resources of multiple SPS configurations.
17. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to receive, from the base station a configuration including one or more parameters related to transmitting the SRS, wherein the one or more parameters include at least one of a resource density or a comb level for transmitting the SRS.
18. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to receive, from the base station a configuration including one or more parameters related to a number of repetitions of the SRS to transmit, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to transmit the number of repetitions of the SRS over a period of time based on the one or more parameters.
20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to transmit, to the UE, a configuration indicating one or more threshold values for determining to transmit the SRS.
21. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the one or more downlink data transmissions include multiple downlink data transmissions, and wherein the feedback for the multiple downlink data transmissions indicates that the UE is transmitting the SRS for at least a portion of the multiple downlink data transmissions.
22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to transmit, to the UE, a configuration indicating at least one of a threshold number of the multiple downlink data transmissions or a number representing the multiple downlink data transmissions.
23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the configuration further indicates a time period after which to transmit the SRS to the apparatus, and wherein receiving the SRS is based on determining the uplink resources for receiving the SRS occurring after the time period from receiving the multiple downlink data transmissions.
24. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the one or more processors are configured to interpret the NACK feedback value as the indication that the UE is to transmit the SRS based on a number of negative acknowledged code blocks (CBs), a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBs over a total number of CBs, a number of negative acknowledged code block groups (CBGs), or a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBGs over a total number of CBGs, of the one or more downlink data transmissions.
25. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the one or more processors are configured to cause the apparatus to receive the SRS on a same bandwidth part (BWP) of the one or more downlink data transmissions.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein comparing the one or more parameter values includes comparing at least one of a number of negative acknowledged code blocks (CBs), a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBs over a total number of CBs, a number of negative acknowledged code block groups (CBGs), or a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBGs over a total number of CBGs, of the one or more downlink data transmissions to the one or more threshold values.
29. The method of claim 28, further comprising interpreting the NACK feedback value as the indication that the UE is to transmit the SRS based on a number of negative acknowledged code blocks (CBs), a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBs over a total number of CBs, a number of negative acknowledged code block groups (CBGs), or a ratio between the negative acknowledged CBGs over a total number of CBGs, of the one or more downlink data transmissions.
Unknown
March 5, 2024
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.