Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the instructions that cause the processor to retrain the recommendation model based on the feedback comprise instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause to processor to, responsive to receiving a predefined amount of feedback from one or more clients of the plurality of clients, retrain the recommendation model.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the instructions that cause the processor to cause the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation comprise instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to, responsive to the measure of usefulness exceeding a threshold, cause the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the recommendation model is one of a subscription usage model, a payment channel model, a duplication identification model, or a negotiation model.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the transaction improvement recommendation pertains to a specific transaction.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the transaction improvement recommendation pertains to a specific vendor.
11. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 10, wherein the instructions that cause the processor to retrain the recommendation model based on the feedback comprise instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause to processor to, responsive to receiving a predefined amount of feedback from one or more clients of the plurality of clients, retrain the recommendation model.
12. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 10, wherein the instructions that cause the processor to cause the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation comprise instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to, responsive to the measure of usefulness exceeding a threshold, cause the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation.
13. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 9, wherein the recommendation model is one of a subscription usage model, a payment channel model, a duplication identification model, or a negotiation model.
14. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 9, wherein the transaction improvement recommendation pertains to a specific transaction.
15. The non-transitory computer readable media of claim 9, wherein the transaction improvement recommendation pertains to a specific vendor.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein retraining the recommendation model based on the feedback comprises, responsive to receiving a predefined amount of feedback from one or more clients of the plurality of clients, retraining the recommendation model.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 18, wherein causing the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation comprises, responsive to the measure of usefulness exceeding a threshold, causing the GUI of the SaaS platform to display the transaction improvement recommendation.
Unknown
September 10, 2024
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.