System and Method for Validating a Response Based on Context Information

1. A system for validating a response based on context information comprising: a network interface configured to receive a first message that indicates that a data object is removed from a memory resource via a third party device without an authorization by a user, wherein: the memory resource is associated with the user; and the third party device is associated with a third party; a processor operably coupled to the network interface, and configured to: access the first message; generate a ticket in response to accessing the first message, wherein the ticket uniquely identifies the first message; communicate, to the third party device, a second message that indicates whether the third party confirms a removal of the data object without the authorization by the user; receive a response message from the third party device; extract context information from the response message, wherein the context information represents a meaning of the response message; determine that the response message is valid based at least in part upon the context information; and in response to determining that the response message is valid: recommend one or more actions to be performed on the memory resource; receive a confirmation that the one or more actions are performed; and close the ticket.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein, the one or more actions comprise retrieving the data object from the third party device and storing the data object in the memory resource, in response to the context information indicating that the third party acknowledges the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein, the one or more actions comprise indicating to the user that the data object was not removed from the memory resource without the authorization by the user, in response to the context information indicating that the third party does not acknowledge the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine that the response message is invalid; and in response to determining that the response message is invalid, communicate one or more third messages to the third party device, until a second response message is received from the third party device and is determined to be valid.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the response message is determined to be invalid if it is determined that the response message: is an automatically-generated response; only comprises an acknowledgement message; is associated with another data object; or is associated with another memory resource.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein generating the ticket is further in response to determining that the first message is received less than a threshold number of days before the removal of the data object.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to determine that the third party device removed the data object from the memory resource based at least in part upon historical data communications between the memory resource and the third party device.

8. A method for validating a response based on context information comprising: receiving a first message that indicates that a data object is removed from a memory resource via a third party device without an authorization by a user, wherein: the memory resource is associated with the user; and the third party device is associated with a third party; accessing the first message; generating a ticket in response to accessing the first message, wherein the ticket uniquely identifies the first message; communicating, to the third party device, a second message that indicates whether the third party confirms a removal of the data object without the authorization by the user; receiving a response message from the third party device; extracting context information from the response message, wherein the context information represents a meaning of the response message; determining that the response message is valid based at least in part upon the context information; and in response to determining that the response message is valid: recommending one or more actions to be performed on the memory resource; receiving a confirmation that the one or more actions are performed, and closing the ticket.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein, the one or more actions comprise retrieving the data object from the third party device and storing the data object in the memory resource, in response to the context information indicating that the third party acknowledges the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein, the one or more actions comprise indicating to the user that the data object was not removed from the memory resource without the authorization by the user, in response to the context information indicating that the third party does not acknowledge the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising: determining that the response message is invalid; and in response to determining that the response message is invalid, communicating one or more third messages to the third party device, until a second response message is received from the third party device and is determined to be valid.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the response message is determined to be invalid if it is determined that the response message: is an automatically-generated response; only comprises an acknowledgement message; is associated with another data object; or is associated with another memory resource.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein generating the ticket is further in response to determining that the first message is received less than a threshold number of days before the removal of the data object.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising determining that the third party device removed the data object from the memory resource based at least in part upon historical data communications between the memory resource and the third party device.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: receive a first message that indicates that a data object is removed from a memory resource via a third party device without an authorization by a user, wherein: the memory resource is associated with the user; and the third party device is associated with a third party; access the first message; generate a ticket in response to accessing the first message, wherein the ticket uniquely identifies the first message; communicate, to the third party device, a second message that indicates whether the third party confirms a removal of the data object without the authorization by the user; receive a response message from the third party device; extract context information from the response message, wherein the context information represents a meaning of the response message; determine that the response message is valid based at least in part upon the context information; and in response to determining that the response message is valid: recommend one or more actions to be performed on the memory resource; receive a confirmation that the one or more actions are performed, and close the ticket.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein, the one or more actions comprise retrieving the data object from the third party device and storing the data object in the memory resource, in response to the context information indicating that the third party acknowledges the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein, the one or more actions comprise indicating to the user that the data object was not removed from the memory resource without the authorization by the user, in response to the context information indicating that the third party does not acknowledge the removal of the data object without the authorization by the user.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: determine that the response message is invalid; and in response to determining that the response message is invalid, communicate one or more third messages to the third party device, until a second response message is received from the third party device and is determined to be valid.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the response message is determined to be invalid if it is determined that the response message: is an automatically-generated response; only comprises an acknowledgement message; is associated with another data object; or is associated with another memory resource.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein generating the ticket is further in response to determining that the first message is received less than a threshold number of days before the removal of the data object.