12386505

Cost Considerate Placement Of Data Within A Pool Of Storage Resources

PublishedAugust 12, 2025
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
18 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A method comprising: receiving one or more data objects for storage; selecting, based at least upon one or more characteristics of storage data including a prediction of a proportion of live data compared to garbage collection-eligible data from the one or more data objects at a future time, one or more storage classes from among a plurality of storage classes of one or more data storage services; and storing the one or more data objects to the selected one or more storage classes of the one or more data storage services.

2

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining, for the one or more data objects stored in the one or more data storage services, an estimated quantity of data eligible for garbage collection; and initiating, after determining that resources for continued storage of the one or more data objects exceed resources for performing garbage collection on the data eligible for garbage collection and based upon an expected cost savings based on storage cost savings from performing garbage collection compared against access cost expenses for performing one or more cloud-based operations to perform the garbage collection, garbage collection on the one or more data objects in the one or more data storage services.

3

3. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the one or more storage classes is further based upon determining that a data horizon for the one or more data objects exceed a threshold value.

4

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the data horizon is an estimate for a proportion of live data at a future point in time based upon a model that predicts proportions of live data to garbage collection eligible data for one or more data objects across multiple periods of time.

5

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more data storage services include a cloud-based storage system.

6

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more data storage services include a cloud services provider data object store.

7

7. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium including instructions which, when executed, cause a processor to: receive one or more data objects for storage; select, based at least upon one or more characteristics of storage data including a prediction of a proportion of live data compared to garbage collection-eligible data from the one or more data objects at a future time, one or more storage classes from among a plurality of storage classes of one or more data storage services; and store the one or more data objects to the selected one or more storage classes of the one or more data storage services.

8

8. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, the processor further configured to: determine, for the one or more data objects stored in the one or more data storage services, an estimated quantity of data eligible for garbage collection; and initiate, after determining that resources for continued storage of the one or more data objects exceed resources for performing garbage collection on the data eligible for garbage collection and based upon an expected cost savings based on storage cost savings from performing garbage collection compared against access cost expenses for performing one or more cloud-based operations to perform the garbage collection, garbage collection on the one or more data objects in the one or more data storage services.

9

9. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein to select the one or more storage classes is further based upon the processor determining that a data horizon for the one or more data objects exceed a threshold value.

10

10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the data horizon is an estimate for a proportion of live data at a future point in time based upon a model that predicts proportions of live data to garbage collection eligible data for one or more data objects across multiple periods of time.

11

11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the one or more data storage services include a cloud-based storage system.

12

12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the one or more data storage services include a cloud services provider data object store.

13

13. A method comprising: storing one or more data objects in a cloud-based data storage service; identifying data eligible for garbage collection among the one or more data objects; and initiating, after determining that resources for continued storage of the data eligible for garbage collection exceed resources for performing garbage collection on the data eligible for garbage collection and based upon a prediction of a proportion of live data compared to garbage collection-eligible data from the one or more data objects at a future time, garbage collection on the data eligible for garbage collection in the one or more data storage services.

14

14. The method of claim 13, wherein initiating garbage collection is further based upon determining that a data horizon for the one or more data objects stored in the cloud-based data storage service exceed a threshold value.

15

15. The method of claim 14, the data horizon is an estimate for a proportion of live data at a future point in time based upon a model that predicts proportions of live data to garbage collection eligible data for one or more data objects across multiple periods of time.

16

16. The method of claim 13, wherein the cloud-based data storage service comprises a cloud-based storage system.

17

17. The method of claim 13, wherein the cloud-based data storage service is provided by a cloud services provider data object store.

18

18. The method of claim 13 further comprising selecting one or more storage classes from among a plurality of storage classes of one or more data storage services for storing one or more data objects.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

August 12, 2025

Inventors

DIRK MEISTER
SUBRAMANIAM PERIYAGARAM
REESE ROBERTSON
PRUDHVI LOKIREDDY

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “Cost Considerate Placement Of Data Within A Pool Of Storage Resources” (12386505). https://patentable.app/patents/12386505

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.