6650725

Method for Reducing Artifacts in CT Images That Are Caused by High-Density Structures

PublishedNovember 18, 2003
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
InventorsAndreas Lutz
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
30 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A correction method for reducing artifacts caused by structures of high x-ray absorption in computer tomography images, comprising the steps of: identifying an interfering object in a computer tomography image; locating the interfering object in the computer tomography image; and filtering the computer tomography image as a function of a position of selected pixels relative to the interfering object.

2

2. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein an interfering object in a computer tomography image is located by calculating the position of a centroid of the interfering object in the computer tomography image.

3

3. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein pixels outside an interfering object are used to filter the computer tomography image.

4

4. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising: obtaining a corrected computer tomography image a difference between the original computer tomography image and the filtered computer tomography image.

5

5. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step of filtering includes, including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on a circular arc around a centroid of the interfering object and through the pixel to be filtered in a first filter step, and including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on the straight line through the pixel and a centroid of the interfering object in a second filter step.

6

6. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein large interfering objects are split up into a multiplicity of smaller interfering objects.

7

7. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein only pixels with at least one of a gray-scale value and color value that corresponds to an x-ray absorption value of at least 2000 Hounsfield units are assigned to an interfering object.

8

8. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein when there are a plurality of interfering objects in a computer tomography image, the interfering objects are weighted in accordance with their x-ray absorption value, the interfering objects are sorted in accordance with the weighting, and starting with the first interfering object of the sorting sequence, the computer tomography image for each individual one of the interfering objects is corrected sequentially in accordance with the sorting sequence, and wherein a computer tomography image corrected with reference to a first interfering object of the sorting sequence forms an output for a further correction with reference to a second interfering object of the sorting sequence.

9

9. The correction method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the sorting of the interfering objects is performed downward from a higher degree of x-ray absorption to a lower degree of x-ray absorption.

10

10. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a number of the interfering objects to be used for filtering is restricted.

11

11. A computer software product for reducing artifacts, caused by structures of high x-ray absorption in computer tomography images, for executing the above-described method as claimed in claim 1 , on a data processing system with programmed instructions for executing on the data processing system.

12

12. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein pixels outside an interfering object are used to filter the computer tomography image.

13

13. The correction method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein all the pixels outside an interfering object are used to filter the computer tomography image.

14

14. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein all the pixels outside an interfering object are used to filter the computer tomography image.

15

15. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising: obtaining a corrected computer tomography image a difference between the original computer tomography image and the filtered computer tomography image.

16

16. The correction method as claimed in claim 3 , further comprising: obtaining a corrected computer tomography image a difference between the original computer tomography image and the filtered computer tomography image.

17

17. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the step of filtering includes, including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on a circular arc around the centroid of the interfering object and through the pixel to be filtered in a first filter step, and including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on the straight line through the pixel and the centroid of the interfering object in a second filter step.

18

18. The correction method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the step of filtering includes, including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on a circular arc around a centroid of the interfering object and through the pixel to be filtered in a first filter step, and including locating only neighboring pixels of a pixel to be filtered on the straight line through the pixel and a centroid of the interfering object in a second filter step.

19

19. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein large interfering objects are split up into a multiplicity of smaller interfering objects.

20

20. The correction method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein large interfering objects are split up into a multiplicity of smaller interfering objects.

21

21. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein only pixels with at least one of a gray-scale value and color value that corresponds to an x-ray absorption value of at least 2000 Hounsfield units are assigned to an interfering object.

22

22. The correction method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein only pixels with at least one of a gray-scale value and color value that corresponds to an x-ray absorption value of at least 2000 Hounsfield units are assigned to an interfering object.

23

23. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein when there are a plurality of interfering objects in a computer tomography image, the interfering objects are weighted in accordance with their x-ray absorption value, the interfering objects are sorted in accordance with the weighting, and starting with the first interfering object of the sorting sequence, the computer tomography image for each individual one of the interfering objects is corrected sequentially in accordance with the sorting sequence, and wherein a computer tomography image corrected with reference to a first interfering object of the sorting sequence forms an output for a further correction with reference to a second interfering object of the sorting sequence.

24

24. The correction method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein when there are a plurality of interfering objects in a computer tomography image, the interfering objects are weighted in accordance with their x-ray absorption value, the interfering objects are sorted in accordance with the weighting, and starting with the first interfering object of the sorting sequence, the computer tomography image for each individual one of the interfering objects is corrected sequentially in accordance with the sorting sequence, and wherein a computer tomography image corrected with reference to a first interfering object of the sorting sequence forms an output for a further correction with reference to a second interfering object of the sorting sequence.

25

25. The correction method as claimed in claim 23 , wherein the sorting of the interfering objects is performed downward from a higher degree of x-ray absorption to a lower degree of x-ray absorption.

26

26. The correction method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the sorting of the interfering objects is performed downward from a higher degree of x-ray absorption to a lower degree of x-ray absorption.

27

27. The correction method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein a number of the interfering objects to be used for filtering is restricted.

28

28. The correction method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein a number of the interfering objects to be used for filtering is restricted.

29

29. The correction method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein a number of the interfering objects to be used for filtering is restricted.

30

30. The correction method as claimed in claim 9 , wherein a number of the interfering objects to be used for filtering is restricted.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

November 18, 2003

Inventors

Andreas Lutz

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “METHOD FOR REDUCING ARTIFACTS IN CT IMAGES THAT ARE CAUSED BY HIGH-DENSITY STRUCTURES” (6650725). https://patentable.app/patents/6650725

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.