7599848

System and Methods for Risk Evaluation Using an Object Measure-Value in Strategic Planning

PublishedOctober 6, 2009
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
19 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A computer-implemented method for risk evaluation, the method comprising: using a system, wherein the system comprises a processor, a computer-readable medium, and distinct software modules embodied on the computer-readable medium, and wherein the distinct software modules when executed cause the processor to perform: accessing an object, stored in a memory, wherein the object is a component of a score-card and includes an object risk status and an object measure-value; receiving an assignment structure; assigning, based on the assignment structure, at least one risk to the object, wherein each risk includes a plurality of threat levels and an expectation value derived from the plurality of threat levels; receiving a probability for each threat level within each assigned risk, wherein the probability is associated with a deviation-value of the object measure-value; defining a probability distribution matrix based on the plurality of threat levels within each risk, wherein the matrix comprises a row for each threat level and each row includes the threat level, the deviation-value, and the probability, the deviation-value having a value type selected from the group of absolute number, absolute delta, percentage and percentage delta; determining the expectation value for each risk based on the probability distribution matrix; determining the object measure-value based on the expectation-value of each risk; determining the object risk status using pre-defined rules and based on an aggregation of each expectation-value corresponding to each risk assigned to the object; storing the object in the memory in response to determining the object risk status; and presenting the object-measure value and the object risk status.

2

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the expectation-value step comprises: multiplying the deviation-value with the probability in each row of the probability distribution matrix corresponding to the risk; and adding the results of the multiplying step.

3

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the expectation-value step comprises: multiplying the deviation-value with the probability in each row of the probability distribution matrix corresponding to the risk; and adding the results of the multiplying step.

4

4. The method of claim 1 , comprising: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

5

5. The method of claim 1 , comprising: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

6

6. The method of claim 2 , comprising: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

7

7. The method of claim 3 , comprising: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

8

8. A method as in one of claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , and 7 , wherein the object comprises at least one of strategy, strategy-element, perspective, objective, target and measure.

9

9. A method as in one of claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , and 7 , wherein the at least one risk is a component of a risk-catalogue.

10

10. A computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method of risk evaluation, the method comprising: accessing an object, stored in memory, wherein the object is a component of a score-card and includes an object risk status and an object measure-value; receiving an assignment structure; assigning, based on the assignment structure, at least one risk to the object, wherein each risk includes a plurality of threat levels and an expectation value derived from the plurality of threat levels; receiving a probability for each threat level within each assigned risk, wherein the probability is associated with a deviation-value of the object measure-value; defining a probability distribution matrix based on the plurality of threat levels within each risk, wherein a row is created in the matrix for each threat level and each row includes the threat level, the deviation-value, and the probability, the deviation-value having a value type selected from the group of absolute number, absolute delta, percentage and percentage delta; determining the expectation value for each risk based on the probability distribution matrix; determining the object measure-value based on the expectation-value of each risk; determining the object risk status using pre-defined rules and based on an aggregation of each expectation-value corresponding to each risk assigned to the object; storing the object in the memory in response to determining the object risk status; and presenting the object-measure value and the object risk status.

11

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions for determining the expectation-value comprise: multiplying the deviation-value with the probability in each row of the probability distribution matrix corresponding to the risk; and adding the results of the multiplying step.

12

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 10 , comprising instructions for: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

13

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 11 , comprising instructions for: providing at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and aggregating the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

14

14. A risk evaluation system comprising: at least one memory for storing an object, a risk at least one risk, and an assignment structure; at least one processor for executing program instructions for accessing an object, wherein the object is a component of a score-card stored by the at least one memory and includes an object risk status and an object measure-value, and assigning, based on the assignment structure, at least one risk to the object, wherein each risk includes a plurality of threat levels and an expectation value derived from the plurality of threat levels; a bus for receiving a probability for each threat level within each assigned risk, wherein the probability is associated with a deviation-value of the object measure-value; the at least one processor for executing program instructions for defining a probability distribution matrix based on the plurality of threat levels within each risk, wherein a row is created in the matrix for each threat level and each row includes the threat level, the deviation-value, and the probability, the deviation-value having a value type selected from the group of absolute number, absolute delta, percentage and percentage delta; the at least one processor for executing program instructions for determining the expectation value for each risk based on the probability distribution matrix; the at least one processor for executing program instructions for determining the object measure-value based on the expectation-value of each risk; the at least one processor for determining the object risk status using pre-defined rules and based on an aggregation of each expectation-value corresponding to each risk assigned to the object; and the bus for storing the object and presenting the object-measure value and the object risk status.

15

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the at least one processor for executing program instructions for determining the expectation value executes program instructions for: multiplying the deviation-value with the probability in each row of the probability distribution matrix corresponding to the risk; and adding the results of the multiplying step.

16

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the at least one memory stores at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and wherein the at least one processor executes program instructions to aggregate the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

17

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one memory stores at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and wherein the at least one processor executes program instructions to aggregate the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

18

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one memory stores at least a further score-card, wherein the further score-card is substantially equivalent to the score-card and has a similar object, which is similar to the object of the score-card; and wherein the at least one processor executes program instructions to aggregate the object measure-value into a corresponding object measure-value of the similar object.

19

19. A system as in one of claims 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 and 18 , wherein the at least one risk is a component of a risk-catalogue stored by the at least one memory.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

October 6, 2009

Inventors

Marcus Wefers
Thomas Fleckenstein

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR RISK EVALUATION USING AN OBJECT MEASURE-VALUE IN STRATEGIC PLANNING” (7599848). https://patentable.app/patents/7599848

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.

SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR RISK EVALUATION USING AN OBJECT MEASURE-VALUE IN STRATEGIC PLANNING — Marcus Wefers | Patentable