Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A printing system, comprising: one or more xerographic components that execute plans to process jobs; a planner that receives multiple batches of job requests for concurrent parallel processing; a plurality of parallel planning queues, each of which is associated with a batch and comprises an unplanned subqueue that stores unplanned job requests for its batch, an unsent subqueue that stores planned jobs that have not been output for execution, and a sent subqueue that stores planned jobs that have been output for execution; and a queue evaluator that identifies an unsent subqueue having a shortest length relative to other unsent subqueues and identifies a job request in the unplanned subqueue in the same planning queue as the shortest unsent subqueue; and a memory that stores one or more computer-executable routines that are executed by the planner and the queue evaluator; wherein the planner generates a plan for executing the identified job request, and advances the job request from the unplanned subqueue to the unsent subqueue upon generating the plan for the job request.
2. The printing system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the queue evaluator evaluates the unsent subqueues in the planning queues, identifies a job plan that is ready to be output to a machine, and wherein the planner removes the job plans from respective unsent subqueues, outputs the job plans to respective machines for execution, and inserts the job plans in respective sent subqueues.
3. The printing system as set forth in claim 2 , wherein the queue evaluator determines whether one or more unplanned subqueues is empty, and wherein the planner requests a new batch of job requests and fills an empty unplanned subqueue for continued concurrent processing with other unplanned subqueues.
4. The printing system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the subqueues are first-in-first-out (FIFO) subqueues.
5. The printing system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein each planning queue and each batch of job requests is associated with a single or multiple machines.
6. The printing system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the queue evaluator determines the length of an unsent subqueue as a function of a number of planned jobs in the unsent subqueue.
7. The printing system as set forth in claim 6 , wherein the queue evaluator determines whether two or more unsent subqueues qualify as the shortest unsent subqueue, and resolves a “tie” condition between two equally qualified shortest unsent subqueues in favor of the unsent subqueue that has less-recently been updated with a job plan.
8. A non-transitory computer-program product comprising computer-executable instructions embodied in a computer-readable medium for concurrently processing job request batches for machine control, the instructions comprising: generating and storing a plurality of parallel planning queues, each comprising an unplanned subqueue that stores unplanned job requests, an unsent subqueue that stores planned job that are unsent; and a sent subqueue that stores job requests that have been planned and sent to a device for execution; associating each of a plurality of received job request batches with a respective planning queue; parallel-processing job request batches; and generating and outputting a job plan for each job request in each job request batch.
9. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , further comprising: identifying an unsent subqueue having a shortest length relative to other unsent subqueues; identifying a job request in the unplanned subqueue in the same planning queue as the shortest unsent subqueue; generating a plan for executing the identified job request; and inserting the planned job into the identified unsent subqueue to increase its length.
10. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , the instructions further comprising evaluating all unsent subqueues in all planning queues, identifying a job plan that is ready to be output to a machine, removing the job plans from respective unsent subqueues, sending the job plans to respective machines for execution, and inserting the job plans in respective sent subqueues.
11. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 10 , the instructions further comprising determining whether one or more unplanned subqueues is empty.
12. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 11 , the instructions further comprising requesting a new batch of job requests and filling an empty unplanned subqueue for continued concurrent processing with other unplanned subqueues.
13. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 11 , the instructions further comprising reiterating the method upon a determination that none of the planning queues is empty.
14. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the subqueues are first-in-first-out (FIFO) subqueues.
15. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , wherein each planning queue is associated with one or more machines, and wherein the batch of job requests that is inserted into the unplanned subqueue of a given planning queue comprises job requests for the machine associated with the planning queue.
16. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , the instructions further comprising determining the length of an unsent subqueue as a function of a number of planned jobs in the unsent subqueue.
17. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 16 , the instructions further comprising determining whether two or more unsent subqueues qualify as the shortest unsent subqueue.
18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 , the instructions further comprising resolving a “tie” condition between two equally qualified shortest unsent subqueues as a function of at least one of job fairness, end time of a current job, makespan of the current job, time/cost already invested in the current job, and the estimated wear and tear of the plant or machine.
19. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , the instructions further comprising determining the length of an unsent subqueue as a function of a total execution time associated with all planned jobs in the unsent subqueue.
20. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 8 , the instructions further comprising determining the length of an unsent subqueue as a function of the finishing time of all plan jobs in the unsent subqueue.
Unknown
June 11, 2013
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.