8589360

Verifying Consistency Levels

PublishedNovember 19, 2013
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
20 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A method, comprising: storing a value in a cloud-based storage system comprising a read/write register identified by a key; creating at a monitor a history of operations including writes and reads performed at the key; quantifying a distance between a read of a value at the key and a latest write to the key, wherein the latest write to the key is subsequent to the read of the value; and ascertaining whether the distance satisfies a relaxed atomicity standard, wherein the distance between the write and the read is one selected from a quantity based on a passage of time between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key and a quantity of intervening writes between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key.

2

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distance between the write and the read is quantified by measuring a passage of time.

3

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein quantifying the distance comprises: sorting the operations in the history into clusters, wherein each cluster comprises operations taking one value; recognizing zones in each cluster, wherein zones are time intervals between operations scoring a conflict between a pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 with a score χ, where χ is the minimum time (Δ) by which decreasing the start times of reads in the history results in the pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 being compatible; and designating Δ opt as a maximum χ calculated for a plurality of pairs of zones in the history.

4

4. The method of claim 3 , comprising setting χ equal to the length of an intersection of zones Z 1 and Z 2 when said zones are forward conflicting zones.

5

5. The method of claim 3 , comprising setting χ equal to a difference between endpoints of zones Z 1 and Z 2 when said zones are a forward zone and a conflicting backward zone.

6

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the difference is a minimum difference between adjacent endpoints of the zones when the backward conflicting zone contains a read dictated by a write beginning earlier than the forward zone.

7

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein quantifying the distance comprises: sorting the operations in the history into clusters, wherein each cluster comprises operations taking one value; recognizing zones in each cluster, wherein zones are time intervals between operations; scoring a conflict between a pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 with a score χ, where χ is the minimum time (λ) by which decreasing the start times and increasing the finish times of operations in the history results in the pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 being compatible; and designating λ opt as a maximum χ calculated for a plurality of pairs of zones in the history.

8

8. The method of claim 7 , comprising setting χ equal to one-half the length of an intersection of zones Z 1 and Z 2 when said zones are forward conflicting zones.

9

9. The method of claim 7 , comprising setting χ equal to one-half the smaller difference between endpoints of zones Z 1 and Z 2 when said zones are a forward zone and a conflicting backward zone.

10

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein creating the history comprises ordering a plurality of operations in the history so as to minimize a number of intervening writes between each write and the read dictated by that write.

11

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein ordering the plurality of operations comprises: selecting a write w(a), where w(a) has a latest finish time among writes yet to be placed; computing a set S of unpicked reads that succeed w(a) in the history; computing the set R defined as the unpicked reads in S not dictated by w(a); placing the write dictating a lone read in R when |R|=1; and placing a write having the latest finish time of the remaining writes yet to be placed when |R|=0.

12

12. The method of claim 11 , comprising reporting a violation of the relaxed atomicity standard when |R|>1.

13

13. A monitor, comprising: an input module to receive a trace of operations made through a read/write register of a cloud-based storage system, wherein the read/write register is identified by a key; a relaxed atomicity standard; a memory; at least one hardware processor connected to the memory, the at least one hardware processor to: create, from the trace, a history of writes and reads performed at the key; quantify a distance between a write of a value at the key and a read of the value, wherein the write of the value at the key is subsequent to the read of the value; and ascertain whether the distance satisfies a relaxed atomicity standard, wherein the distance between the write and the read is one selected from a quantity based on a passage of time between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key and a quantity of intervening writes between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key.

14

14. The monitor of claim 13 , wherein the distance between the write and the read comprises a passage of time.

15

15. The monitor of claim 14 , wherein quantifying the distance comprises: dividing the operations in the history into clusters, wherein each cluster comprises operations taking one value; recognizing zones in each cluster, wherein zones are time intervals between operations; scoring a conflict between a pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 with a score χ, where χ is the minimum time (Δ) by which decreasing the start times of reads in the history results in the pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 being compatible; and designating Δ opt as a maximum χ calculated for a plurality of pairs of zones in the history.

16

16. The monitor of claim 14 , wherein quantifying the distance comprises: dividing the operations in the history into clusters, wherein each cluster comprises operations taking one value; recognizing zones in each cluster, wherein zones are time intervals between operations; scoring a conflict between a pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 with a score χ, where χ is the minimum time (λ) by which decreasing the start times and increasing the finish times of operations in the history results in the pair of zones Z 1 and Z 2 being compatible; and designating λ opt as a maximum χ calculated for a plurality of pairs of zones in the history.

17

17. The monitor of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further to: order a plurality of operations in the history so as to minimize a number of intervening writes between each write and the read dictated by that write, and determine that the distance satisfies the relaxed atomicity standard when a maximum number of intervening writes in the history is less than or equal to 2.

18

18. The monitor of claim 17 , wherein ordering the plurality of operations comprises: selecting a write w(a), where w(a) has a latest finish time among writes yet to placed; computing a set S of unpicked reads that succeed w(a) in the history; computing the set R defined as the unpicked reads in S not dictated by w(a); placing the write dictating a lone read in R when |R|=1; and placing an write having the latest finishing time of the remaining writes yet to be placed when |R|=0.

19

19. The monitor of claim 18 , wherein the processor is further to identify a violation of the relaxed atomicity standard when |R|>1.

20

20. A non-transitory computer readable medium having tangibly embodied thereon instructions for execution by a processor to perform a process comprising: receiving a trace of operations made through a read/write register of a cloud-based storage system, wherein the read/write register is identified by a key; creating from the trace a history of writes and reads performed at the key; quantifying a distance between a write of a value at the key and a read of the value, wherein the write of the value is subsequent to the read of the value; and ascertaining whether the distance satisfies a relaxed atomicity standard, wherein the distance between the write and the read is one selected from a quantity based on a passage of time between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key and a quantity of intervening writes between the read of the value at the key and the latest write to the key.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

November 19, 2013

Inventors

Xiaozhou Li
Wojciech Golab
Mehul A. Shah

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “VERIFYING CONSISTENCY LEVELS” (8589360). https://patentable.app/patents/8589360

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.