Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.
1. An apparatus for editing a document containing a plurality of pages, each of the plurality of pages including one or more first objects, the apparatus comprising: a processor that adds a second object to each of the plurality of pages and determines for each of the plurality of pages, whether the respective page is an improper page by determining whether a state of content on each of the plurality of pages corresponds to any of a plurality of causes due to which the second object is not added properly; a display that displays, for each of the plurality of causes, a quantity of improper pages thus determined; an input unit that receives input to exclude, from the improper pages, a selected page corresponding to a cause selected by a user; and an informing portion that informs the user of a to-be-confirmed page that corresponds to the improper pages remaining after excluding the selected page, wherein if a page is determined to be an improper page due to more than one cause of the plurality of causes, the improper page is attributed to a cause based on a ratio of an overlap of an area of the second object and an area of one of the first objects on the improper page.
An apparatus edits multi-page documents by automatically adding a "second object" (e.g., page number, watermark) to each page. It then analyzes each page to identify "improper pages" where the added object might obscure existing content ("first objects"). The apparatus determines if a page is improper based on pre-defined "causes" (e.g., overlap with text/images, color similarity). It displays the number of improper pages for each cause and allows a user to exclude pages from consideration based on a selected cause. Finally, it informs the user of the remaining improper pages requiring manual confirmation. If a page has multiple causes, the dominant cause is selected based on the overlap area ratio.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising a thumbnail display portion that displays thumbnail images of the improper pages determined for each cause.
The document editing apparatus described in Claim 1 includes a thumbnail display component. This component shows small previews (thumbnails) of the improper pages identified for each specific cause (e.g., overlapping text, similar colors). This allows the user to quickly visually assess the types of problems detected and prioritize their review, making it easier to determine if the added object (like a watermark) interferes with existing content on those pages, improving the efficiency of document editing and correction.
3. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the second object is a page number, a watermark, a date, a company logo, a magazine title, or a book title.
In the document editing apparatus of Claim 1, the "second object" that's automatically added to each page can be one of the following: a page number, a watermark, a date, a company logo, a magazine title, or a book title. This defines the types of elements the apparatus is designed to automatically insert and then intelligently verify for proper placement, ensuring they don't interfere with existing document content. The system automatically adds these elements, then uses defined causes to identify pages where manual review and adjustment are needed.
4. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the causes are at least one of the following: the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents an image are placed one above the other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents a text are placed one above the other; a color of a text constituting the second object and a color of a background of a page on which the second object is placed are equal or similar to each other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a pattern are placed one above the other; and the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a title or a logo are placed one above the other.
In the document editing apparatus of Claim 1, the "causes" that trigger the identification of "improper pages" include these scenarios: the added object overlaps an image; it overlaps text; its text color is too similar to the page background; it overlaps a pattern; or it overlaps a title/logo. These specific checks allow the apparatus to automatically flag pages where the added object (e.g., a watermark) might be unreadable or obscure existing important content, requiring user intervention to reposition or adjust the added object.
5. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the informing portion informs the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying highlighted page icons corresponding to the remaining improper pages.
In the document editing apparatus of Claim 1, the system alerts the user about pages needing confirmation by highlighting page icons corresponding to the remaining improper pages. This visual indication allows the user to quickly locate and review the problematic pages within the document, speeding up the manual confirmation process after the automated analysis and filtering have been performed. The highlighted page icons directly link the analysis results to the document interface.
6. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the informing portion informs the user of the to-be-confirmed page by generating an electronic file containing, therein, page numbers of the remaining improper pages, and opening the electronic file through an operation performed by the user.
In the document editing apparatus of Claim 1, the apparatus notifies the user of to-be-confirmed pages by generating a file (e.g., a text or CSV file) that lists the page numbers of the remaining improper pages. The system then opens this file, allowing the user to easily see the list and navigate to those specific pages in the document for review and correction. The electronic file provides a structured record of the flagged pages.
7. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the informing portion informs the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying a pop-up containing, therein, page numbers of the remaining improper pages.
In the document editing apparatus of Claim 1, the system informs the user about to-be-confirmed pages by displaying a pop-up window containing a list of the page numbers of the remaining improper pages. This immediate visual notification presents the page numbers directly to the user, enabling them to quickly identify and navigate to the pages requiring further inspection within the document, facilitating a prompt correction workflow.
8. A method for editing a document containing a plurality of pages, each of the plurality of pages including one or more first objects, the method being used in an apparatus for editing the document and that comprises a processor, the method comprising: adding, using the processor, a second object to said each of the plurality of pages; determining, using the processor, for each of the plurality of pages, whether the respective page is an improper page by determining whether a state of content on each of the plurality of pages corresponds to any of a plurality of causes due to which the second object is not added properly; displaying, using a display, for each of the plurality of causes, a quantity of improper pages thus determined; excluding, using the processor, from the improper pages, a selected page corresponding to a cause selected by a user; and informing, using the display, the user of a to-be-confirmed page that corresponds to the improper pages remaining after excluding the selected page, wherein if a page is determined to be an improper page due to more than one cause of the plurality of causes, the improper page is attributed to a cause based on a ratio of an overlap of an area of the second object and an area of one of the first objects on the improper page.
A method for editing multi-page documents involves automatically adding a second object (e.g., page number, watermark) to each page. The method analyzes each page to identify "improper pages" where the added object might obscure existing content ("first objects"). A processor determines if a page is improper based on pre-defined "causes" (e.g., overlap with text/images, color similarity). The system displays the number of improper pages for each cause and allows the user to exclude pages based on cause. Finally, the user is notified of the remaining improper pages needing manual confirmation. If a page has multiple causes, the dominant cause is selected based on the overlap area ratio.
9. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising causing the apparatus to perform a thumbnail display process of displaying thumbnail images of the improper pages determined for each cause.
The document editing method of Claim 8 includes displaying thumbnail images of the improper pages, categorized by the cause of the potential problem (e.g., overlap with text, color similarity). This allows a user to quickly visually assess each improper page flagged for manual review, and identify which are likely to require intervention.
10. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the second object is a page number, a watermark, a date, a company logo, a magazine title, or a book title.
In the document editing method of Claim 8, the second object being automatically added can be a page number, watermark, date, company logo, magazine title, or book title.
11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the causes are at least one of the following: the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents an image are placed one above the other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents a text are placed one above the other; a color of a text constituting the second object and a color of a background of a page on which the second object is placed are equal or similar to each other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a pattern are placed one above the other; and the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a title or a logo are placed one above the other.
In the document editing method of Claim 8, the "causes" used to identify improper pages include scenarios where the added object overlaps an image, overlaps text, has a text color similar to the background, overlaps a pattern, or overlaps a title/logo. These pre-defined conditions determine when a page is flagged for manual review.
12. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying highlighted page icons corresponding to the remaining improper pages.
In the document editing method of Claim 8, informing the user of to-be-confirmed pages involves highlighting page icons representing the remaining improper pages. This allows the user to quickly find and review pages that were automatically flagged, but still need confirmation by a human.
13. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by generating an electronic file containing, therein, page numbers of the remaining improper pages, and opening the electronic file through an operation performed by the user.
In the document editing method of Claim 8, informing the user involves generating a file (e.g., text or CSV) containing page numbers of the improper pages. The file is opened for the user to view. This allows the user to quickly identify the specific flagged pages.
14. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying a pop-up containing, therein, page numbers of the remaining improper pages.
In the document editing method of Claim 8, informing the user is done by displaying a pop-up showing page numbers of the flagged pages. This provides immediate notification of pages needing review.
15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing thereon a computer program used in an apparatus, comprising a processor, for editing a document containing a plurality of pages, each of the plurality of pages including one or more first objects, the computer program causing the apparatus to perform: an adding process of adding, using the processor, a second object to said each of the plurality of pages; a determining process of determining, using the processor, for each of the plurality of pages, whether the respective page is an improper page by determining whether a state of content on each of the plurality of pages corresponds to any of a plurality of causes due to which the second object is not added properly; a quantity display process of displaying, using a display, for each of the plurality of causes, a quantity of improper pages thus determined; an excluding process of excluding, using the processor, from the improper pages, a selected page corresponding to a cause selected by a user; and an informing process of informing, using the display, the user of a to-be-confirmed page that corresponds to the improper pages remaining after excluding the selected page, wherein if a page is determined to be an improper page due to more than one cause of the plurality of causes, the improper page is attributed to a cause based on a ratio of an overlap of an area of the second object and an area of one of the first objects on the improper page.
A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium stores a program that enables document editing. The program adds a "second object" (e.g., page number, watermark) to each page of a multi-page document. It determines if a page is "improper" (added object obscures existing content) based on pre-defined "causes" (e.g., overlap). The number of improper pages is displayed for each cause. A user can exclude pages based on selected causes. The user is then notified of the remaining improper pages needing confirmation. If a page has multiple causes, a dominant cause is determined by comparing overlap area ratios.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , further comprising causing the apparatus to perform a thumbnail display process of displaying thumbnail images of the remaining improper pages determined for each cause.
The computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15 further includes instructions to display thumbnail images of the improper pages identified for each specific cause. This allows a user to visually assess each potentially problematic page and makes the confirmation process more efficient.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the second object is a page number, a watermark, a date, a company logo, a magazine title, or a book title.
In the computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15, the second object that's automatically added can be a page number, a watermark, a date, a company logo, a magazine title, or a book title.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the causes are at least one of the following: the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents an image are placed one above the other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose data represents a text are placed one above the other; a color of a text constituting the second object and a color of a background of a page on which the second object is placed are equal or similar to each other; the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a pattern are placed one above the other; and the second object and an object corresponding to the first object whose type is a title or a logo are placed one above the other.
In the computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15, the causes used to identify "improper pages" include: overlap between the added object and an image; overlap with text; similarity between the added object's text color and the background color; overlap with a pattern; and overlap with a title or logo.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying highlighted page icons corresponding to the remaining improper pages.
In the computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15, the step of informing the user of to-be-confirmed pages involves displaying highlighted page icons corresponding to those pages.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by generating an electronic file containing, therein, page numbers of the improper pages, and opening the electronic file through an operation performed by the user.
In the computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15, the step of informing the user of to-be-confirmed pages includes generating an electronic file containing a list of the page numbers of the improper pages and automatically opening the file for the user.
21. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium according to claim 15 , wherein the informing process includes informing the user of the to-be-confirmed page by displaying a pop-up containing, therein, page numbers of the remaining improper pages.
In the computer-readable storage medium of Claim 15, the step of informing the user of to-be-confirmed pages includes displaying a pop-up window that lists the page numbers of the remaining improper pages.
Unknown
December 16, 2014
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.