Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A computer-implemented method comprising: determining, by one or more computing devices, quality-of-service information associated with a first participant in a first electronic call; storing, by the one or more computing devices, the quality-of-service information in a quality-of-service history database, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with a second electronic call including determining a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues includes mining the quality-of-service history database, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the second electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of a second participant based upon, at least in part, a current location of the second participant and a trajectory of expected movement from the current location.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: providing to one or more of a user and a moderator, by the one or more computing devices, a visual indicator of the likelihood of quality-of-service issues.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the visual indicator includes one or more of geographical and infrastructure-related information associated with the likelihood of quality-of-service issues.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is associated with the second participant associated with the second electronic call.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the quality-of-service information further includes a second quality-of-service score associated with at least one of an electronic call, participant location data, connection information, and participant device information.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, an infrastructure-related feature.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, one or more of a predicted call duration and calendar information.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, one or more of connection information and participant device information.
9. A computer-implemented method comprising: determining, by one or more computing devices, first quality-of-service information associated with a first participant in a first electronic call; storing, by the one or more computing devices, the first quality-of-service information in a quality-of-service history database, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; determining, by the one or more computing devices, second quality-of-service information associated with a second participant in a second electronic call including determining a likelihood of when quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues includes mining the quality-of-service history database, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the second electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of the second participant; and storing, by the one or more computing devices, the second quality-of-service information in the quality-of-service history database.
10. A computer-implemented method comprising: providing, by one or more computing devices, a quality-of-service history database; determining, by the one or more computing devices, quality-of-service information associated with a participant in an electronic call, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; mining, by the one or more computing devices, the quality-of-service history database for historical quality-of-service information associated with the determined quality-of-service information; and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the electronic call, based upon, at least in part, the historical quality-of-service information including determining a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of a second participant based upon at least in part a current location of the second participant and a trajectory of expected movement from the current location.
Unknown
December 8, 2015
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.