9210255

Social Quality-Of-Service Database

PublishedDecember 8, 2015
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
10 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A computer-implemented method comprising: determining, by one or more computing devices, quality-of-service information associated with a first participant in a first electronic call; storing, by the one or more computing devices, the quality-of-service information in a quality-of-service history database, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with a second electronic call including determining a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues includes mining the quality-of-service history database, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the second electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of a second participant based upon, at least in part, a current location of the second participant and a trajectory of expected movement from the current location.

2

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: providing to one or more of a user and a moderator, by the one or more computing devices, a visual indicator of the likelihood of quality-of-service issues.

3

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the visual indicator includes one or more of geographical and infrastructure-related information associated with the likelihood of quality-of-service issues.

4

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is associated with the second participant associated with the second electronic call.

5

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the quality-of-service information further includes a second quality-of-service score associated with at least one of an electronic call, participant location data, connection information, and participant device information.

6

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, an infrastructure-related feature.

7

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, one or more of a predicted call duration and calendar information.

8

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues is based upon, at least in part, one or more of connection information and participant device information.

9

9. A computer-implemented method comprising: determining, by one or more computing devices, first quality-of-service information associated with a first participant in a first electronic call; storing, by the one or more computing devices, the first quality-of-service information in a quality-of-service history database, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; determining, by the one or more computing devices, second quality-of-service information associated with a second participant in a second electronic call including determining a likelihood of when quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues includes mining the quality-of-service history database, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the second electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of the second participant; and storing, by the one or more computing devices, the second quality-of-service information in the quality-of-service history database.

10

10. A computer-implemented method comprising: providing, by one or more computing devices, a quality-of-service history database; determining, by the one or more computing devices, quality-of-service information associated with a participant in an electronic call, wherein the quality-of-service information includes one or more geographical regions designated with a quality-of-service score, based upon, at least in part, a quality-of-service threshold value set by a user; mining, by the one or more computing devices, the quality-of-service history database for historical quality-of-service information associated with the determined quality-of-service information; and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the electronic call, based upon, at least in part, the historical quality-of-service information including determining a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will begin and a likelihood of when the quality-of-service issues will resolve, including an estimated amount of time until the quality of service issues begin and an estimated amount of time until the quality-of-service issues resolve, wherein determining the likelihood of quality-of-service issues associated with the electronic call is based upon, at least in part, determining a predicted second location of a second participant based upon at least in part a current location of the second participant and a trajectory of expected movement from the current location.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

December 8, 2015

Inventors

Jonathan Dunne
James Patrick Galvin JR.
Shailendra Maheshwari
Patrick Joseph O'Sulivan

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “SOCIAL QUALITY-OF-SERVICE DATABASE” (9210255). https://patentable.app/patents/9210255

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.