Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method for removing signal interference in a MIMO-based interference removing apparatus, the method comprising: transmitting a reference signal to at least one receiver; if channel information is estimated by the receiver, receiving the estimated channel information from the receiver as a feedback signal; producing a transmission pre-coding matrix, a beam forming matrix, and a weighted matrix using the received channel information; and transmitting information containing the transmission pre-coding matrix, the beam forming matrix, and the weighted matrix by including them in a pilot signal to the receiver, wherein the MIMO-based interference removing apparatus comprises at least one transmitter.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein upon receiving the pilot signal, the receiver produces a received beam forming matrix and transmits it to the transmitter.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transmitter comprises at least one wireless AP or at least one relay and the receiver comprises at least one wireless terminal.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said producing transmission pre-coding matrix, beam forming matrix, and weighted matrix using the received channel information comprises: initializing the transmission pre-coding matrix with respect to the transmitter and the receiver; calculating the beam forming matrix with respect to the transmitter and the receiver; calculating the weighted matrix with respect to the transmitter and the receiver; calculating the transmission pre-coding matrix in case of constraining a transmission power of the transmitter, or the transmission pre-coding matrix in case of constraining a transmission power of the receiver; and repeatedly performing the calculations until the weighted sum mean square error (MSE) of the weighted matrix converges on a predetermined threshold value.
7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the covariance matrix is calculated by the following equation: Φ [ k , i ] = ( σ n 2 + σ e 2 ∑ ( 1 , j ) tr { V [ 1 , j ] V [ 1 , j ] H } ) I + ∑ ( 1 , j ) H j [ k , i ] V [ 1 , j ] V [ 1 , j ] H H j [ k , i ] H where σ e 2 denotes a variance value of noise influenced on the receiver, and where σ 2 n denotes a variance value of baseline noise.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the transmission pre-coding matrix is calculated by the following equation in cases where a transmission power of the transmitter is constrained: V [ k , i ] = ( ∑ ( i , j ) μ [ 1 , j ] H ~ i [ 1 , j ] H U [ 1 , j ] W [ 1 , j ] U [ 1 , j ] H H ~ i [ 1 , j ] + σ e 2 ∑ ( i , j ) μ [ 1 , j ] tr { W [ 1 , j ] U [ 1 , j ] H U [ 1 , j ] } I + λ i I ) - 1 × μ [ k , i ] H ~ i [ k , i ] H U [ k , i ] W [ k , i ] where μ [k,i] denotes the priority of the receiver, λ i denotes a Lagrange Multiplier of the transmitter, which selects a value satisfying ∑ k = 1 K i tr { V [ k , i ] V [ k , i ] H } ≤ P i , and P i denotes an upper limit of the transmission power of the transmitter.
10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the transmission pre-coding matrix is calculated by the following equation in case where a transmission power of the receiver is constrained: V [ k , i ] = ( ∑ ( i , j ) μ [ 1 , j ] H ~ i [ 1 , j ] H U [ 1 , j ] W [ 1 , j ] U [ 1 , j ] H H ~ i [ 1 , j ] + K i P i σ e 2 tr { μ [ k , i ] W [ k , i ] U [ k , i ] H U [ k , i ] } I + σ e 2 ∑ ( 1 , j ) tr { μ [ 1 , j ] W [ 1 , j ] U [ 1 , j ] H U [ 1 , j ] } I ) × μ [ k , i ] β H ~ i [ k , i ] H U [ k , i ] W [ k , i ] where β denotes a power normalization factor and K i denotes the number of the receivers related to the transmitter.
Unknown
February 23, 2016
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.