9819442

Internal Interference Signaling

PublishedNovember 14, 2017
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
InventorsElmar Wagner
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
17 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.

Claim 1

Original Legal Text

1. A method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device comprising a first receiver the method comprising: determining an occurrence of signal interference within the wireless communication device; determining one or more types of interference information to send to a network based on a predetermined policy; sending interference information related to the signal interference associated with the wireless communication device to a network interface of the network based on the predetermined policy to reduce the signal interference; and performing one or more corrective actions to decrease the signal interference within the wireless communication device; wherein the network performs the one or more corrective actions; wherein the one or more corrective actions include a handover of the wireless communication device from one base station to another base station, adjusting a frequency range from a low band to a high band, adjusting a frequency range to a new frequency range, aligning resource blocks of a signal, sending a message to the wireless communication device to reduce a power level thereof, switching to a modulation scheme that requires less of a signal-to-noise ratio or error vector magnitude, and combinations thereof.

Plain English Translation

A method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device with a receiver involves detecting internal signal interference. Based on a predefined policy, the device determines the type of interference information to send to the network and transmits this information to the network interface, aiming to mitigate the interference. The network then performs corrective actions to reduce interference, such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 2

Original Legal Text

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wireless communication device further comprises a second receiver operating in carrier aggregation mode, wherein signals received at the first receiver are first signals and signals received at the second receiver are second signals.

Plain English Translation

The method described for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1) is extended to a device utilizing carrier aggregation with two receivers. The first receiver processes first signals, while the second receiver processes second signals, both potentially subject to the described interference management process which includes detecting internal signal interference, sending data to the network, and the network undertaking corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 3

Original Legal Text

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the signals have a first frequency range and a second frequency range.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers (as described in claim 2, where the first receiver processes first signals and the second receiver processes second signals), the first and second signals operate on different frequency ranges: a first frequency range and a second frequency range. This difference in frequency is then used to detect internal signal interference, send data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 4

Original Legal Text

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein a harmonic of the second frequency range overlaps with the first frequency range.

Plain English Translation

The method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers operating on different frequency ranges (as described in claim 3, where the first receiver processes signals at a first frequency range and the second receiver processes signals at a second frequency range), experiences interference because a harmonic frequency of the second frequency range overlaps with the first frequency range. This overlap then is used to trigger internal signal interference detection, sending data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 5

Original Legal Text

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein a harmonic of the second frequency range is near the first frequency range.

Plain English Translation

The method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers operating on different frequency ranges (as described in claim 3, where the first receiver processes signals at a first frequency range and the second receiver processes signals at a second frequency range), experiences interference because a harmonic frequency of the second frequency range is near the first frequency range, but not directly overlapping. This proximity then is used to trigger internal signal interference detection, sending data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 6

Original Legal Text

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the signals occur internally in the wireless communication device.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers operating on different frequency ranges (as described in claim 3, where the first receiver processes signals at a first frequency range and the second receiver processes signals at a second frequency range), the signals causing the interference are generated internally within the device itself. This internal signal generation is then used to trigger internal signal interference detection, sending data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 7

Original Legal Text

7. The method of claim 3 , wherein one of the signals is transmitted over a cellular network and another one of the signals are transmitted over a wireless local area network.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers operating on different frequency ranges (as described in claim 3, where the first receiver processes signals at a first frequency range and the second receiver processes signals at a second frequency range), one signal is transmitted over a cellular network (e.g., LTE), while the other signal is transmitted over a wireless local area network (WLAN or Wi-Fi). The combination of these network types is then used to trigger internal signal interference detection, sending data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 8

Original Legal Text

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein the first frequency range is a first Long Term Evolution Band and wherein the second frequency is a second Long Term Evolution Band.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device using carrier aggregation with two receivers operating on different frequency ranges (as described in claim 3, where the first receiver processes signals at a first frequency range and the second receiver processes signals at a second frequency range), the first frequency range corresponds to a first Long Term Evolution (LTE) band, and the second frequency range corresponds to a second LTE band. The combination of these frequency ranges is then used to trigger internal signal interference detection, sending data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 9

Original Legal Text

9. The method of claim 2 , wherein the signal interference associated with the wireless device is generated by a power amplifier coupled to a transmitter of either the first receiver or the second receiver, and wherein the signal interference affects reception of signals received by the first receiver and the second receiver.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device utilizing carrier aggregation with two receivers (as described in claim 2, where the first receiver processes first signals and the second receiver processes second signals), the interference is generated by a power amplifier associated with a transmitter of either the first or second receiver. This interference affects the reception of signals by both receivers. The fact the interference originated from the power amplifier is used to determine the course of action.

Claim 10

Original Legal Text

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interference information indicates a level of the signal interference.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1), the interference information sent to the network includes a level or intensity of the signal interference. This level is included in the data sent to the network, so the network can undertake corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 11

Original Legal Text

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interference information comprises a value indicating a minimum frequency shift that is required to reduce the signal interference.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1), the interference information sent to the network includes a value indicating the minimum frequency shift needed to reduce the signal interference. This minimum shift requirement is included in the data sent to the network, so the network can undertake corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 12

Original Legal Text

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interference information indicates a type of signal interference.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1), the interference information sent to the network indicates a specific type of signal interference. This type classification is included in the data sent to the network, so the network can undertake corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 13

Original Legal Text

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the clock interference is internal clock harmonics.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1), the clock interference is caused by internal clock harmonics within the device. The device identifies the clock harmonics as the source of the interference. The device then transmits data to the network, and the network undertakes corrective action such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 14

Original Legal Text

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising switching off the carrier aggregation mode as a corrective action performed by the network.

Plain English Translation

In the method for managing signal interference in a wireless communication device (as described in claim 1), one of the corrective actions performed by the network is switching off the carrier aggregation mode of the device. This is done in an effort to mitigate interference. The network can undertake other corrective actions such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 15

Original Legal Text

15. A device comprising: a processing unit; an information component operatively coupled to the processing unit to identify information related to a plurality of signals associated with the device and to determine an occurrence of a signal interference associated with the device; wherein the signal interference is generated by a power amplifier coupled to a transmitter of a first receiver; wherein the information component is configured to determine one or more types of interference information to send to the network based on the predetermined policy; a communication component is further configured to send interference information to a network interface of a network based on the policy to reduce the signal interference; and wherein the device is configured to have one or more corrective actions performed thereon to decrease the signal interference within the device; and wherein the network performs the one or more corrective actions; wherein the one or more corrective actions include a handover of the wireless communication device from one base station to another base station, adjusting a frequency range from a low band to a high band, adjusting a frequency range to a new frequency range, aligning resource blocks of a signal, sending a message to the device to reduce a power level thereof, switching to a modulation scheme that requires less of a signal-to-noise ratio or error vector magnitude, and combinations thereof.

Plain English Translation

A device for managing signal interference includes a processing unit and an information component. The information component identifies information about multiple signals associated with the device and determines when signal interference occurs. The signal interference is generated by a power amplifier coupled to a transmitter of a first receiver. The information component also determines the types of interference information to send to the network, based on a policy. A communication component sends this interference information to the network interface, so the network can reduce the interference. The network then performs corrective actions, such as handing over the device to another base station, adjusting the frequency range (low to high or to a new range), aligning signal resource blocks, instructing the device to lower its power, or switching to a modulation scheme with lower signal-to-noise requirements.

Claim 16

Original Legal Text

16. The device of claim 15 , wherein the signals have a first frequency range and a second frequency range.

Plain English Translation

The device for managing signal interference (as described in claim 15), utilizes signals that operate in different frequency ranges: a first frequency range and a second frequency range. The device's information component identifies information about these signals and determines when signal interference occurs due to the different frequency ranges.

Claim 17

Original Legal Text

17. The device of claim 16 , wherein a harmonic of the second frequency range overlaps with the first frequency range.

Plain English Translation

The device for managing signal interference that utilizes signals operating in different frequency ranges (as described in claim 16, using a first frequency range and a second frequency range), experiences interference because a harmonic of the second frequency range overlaps with the first frequency range. The information component identifies this overlap and triggers sending information to the network so corrective actions can be taken.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

November 14, 2017

Inventors

Elmar Wagner

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, FAQs, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “INTERNAL INTERFERENCE SIGNALING” (9819442). https://patentable.app/patents/9819442

© 2026 Nomic Interactive Technology LLC. Machine-readable context available at /api/llm-context/9819442. See llms.txt for full attribution policy.