9913283

Assigning a Frame Configuration in a Relay Enabled Communication Network

PublishedMarch 6, 2018
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
18 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A method for assigning a frame configuration in a relay enabled communication network, the method comprising: determining a macro coverage latency between a wireless device and a network node when the wireless device is not communicating through a relay node, the macro coverage latency comprising a first downlink portion and a first uplink portion, the first downlink portion comprising a first average time between transmission of data packets from the network node to the wireless device and reception of acknowledgement of the transmission of the data packets, the first uplink portion being based on a first sounding reference signal transmitted from the wireless device and received at the network node; determining a relay coverage latency between the wireless device and the network node when the wireless device is communicating through a relay node, the relay coverage latency comprising a second downlink portion and a second uplink portion, the second downlink portion comprising a second average time between transmission of data packets from the network node to the wireless device and reception of acknowledgement of the transmission of the data packets, the second uplink portion being based on a second sounding reference signal transmitted from the wireless device and received at the network node via the relay node; and based on a comparison of the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency, selecting a frame configuration for a communication through the relay node.

2

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison of the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency comprises determining if the macro coverage latency is the same as the relay coverage latency.

3

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein selecting the frame configuration comprises selecting a frame configuration that is the same as a frame configuration employed in a communication without the relay node.

4

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison between the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency comprises determining if the relay coverage latency is higher than the macro coverage latency.

5

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining if the relay coverage latency is higher than the macro coverage latency due to the second downlink portion of the relay coverage latency being higher than the first downlink portion of the macro coverage latency.

6

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining if the relay coverage latency is higher than the macro coverage latency due to the second uplink portion of the relay coverage latency being higher than the first uplink portion of the macro coverage latency.

7

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the frame configuration for the communication through the relay node comprises selecting a configuration of uplink and downlink subframes in the frame configuration.

8

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein selecting the configuration of the uplink and downlink subframes comprises selecting a frame configuration with more downlink subframes than uplink subframes.

9

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein selecting the configuration of the uplink and downlink subframes comprises selecting a frame configuration with an equal number of downlink subframes and uplink subframes.

10

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the network node is a access node in communication with the relay node.

11

11. A system for assigning a frame configuration in a relay enabled communication network, the system comprising: an access node configured to communicate with a wireless device; and a relay node in communication with the access node, the relay node being configured to communicate with the wireless device; wherein at least one of the access node and relay node in communication with the wireless device is configured to: determine a macro coverage latency between the wireless device and the access node when the wireless device is not communicating through the relay node, wherein the macro coverage latency comprises a first downlink portion and a first uplink portion, the first downlink portion comprising a first average time between transmission of data packets from the access node to the wireless device and reception of acknowledgement of the transmission of the data packets, the first uplink portion being based on a first sounding reference signal transmitted from the wireless device and received at the access node; determine a relay coverage latency between the wireless device and the access node when the wireless device is communicating through the relay node, wherein the relay coverage latency comprises a second downlink portion and a second uplink portion, the second downlink portion comprising a second average time between transmission of data packets from the access node to the wireless device and reception of acknowledgement of the transmission of the data packets, the second uplink portion being based on a second sounding reference signal transmitted from the wireless device and received at the access node via the relay node; and based on a comparison of the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency, selecting a frame configuration for a communication through the relay node.

12

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the comparison of the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency determines if the macro coverage latency is the same as the relay coverage latency.

13

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the at least one of the access node and relay node is further configured to select the frame configuration that is the same as the frame configuration employed in a communication without the relay node.

14

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the comparison between the macro coverage latency and the relay coverage latency comprises determining if the relay coverage latency is more than the macro coverage latency.

15

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the at least one of the access node and relay node is configured to determine if the relay coverage latency is more than the macro coverage latency due to the second downlink portion of the relay coverage latency being higher than the first downlink portion of the macro coverage latency.

16

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the at least one of the access node and relay node is configured to determine if the relay coverage latency is more than the macro coverage latency the second uplink portion of the relay coverage latency being higher than the first uplink portion of the macro coverage latency.

17

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the frame configuration comprises more uplink subframes than downlink subframes.

18

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the frame configuration comprises an equal number of downlink subframes and uplink subframes.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

March 6, 2018

Inventors

Sreekar Marupaduga
John W. Prock
Maneesh Gauba
Gene S. Mitchell

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “ASSIGNING A FRAME CONFIGURATION IN A RELAY ENABLED COMMUNICATION NETWORK” (9913283). https://patentable.app/patents/9913283

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.