A dynamic risk fault tree (DRFT) for displaying and analyzing risk levels for manufacturing operations. The DRFT incorporates a Dynamic Risk Analyzer (DRA) to periodically assesses real-time or historic process data, or both, associated with an operations site, such as a manufacturing, production, or processing facility, including a plant's operations, and identifies hidden near-misses of such operation, when in real time the process data appears otherwise normal. DRFT assesses the process data in a manner that enables operating personnel including management at a facility to have a comprehensive understanding of the risk status and changes in both alarm and non-alarm based process variables. The DRA and hidden process near-miss data may be analyzed alone or in combination with other process data and/or data resulting from prior near-miss situations to permit strategic action to be taken to reduce or avert the occurrence of adverse incidents or catastrophic failure of a facility operation.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A dynamic risk fault tree system for analyzing risk levels for manufacturing operations comprising: a server that receives automatically measured process data from a real-time data source and/or a historical archive data, source and long-term process data for a period preceding the measured process data, and an expression, previously uploaded by a user of the system, that is either true or false; a processor that analyzes values of parameters P and/or groups G of said parameters P of said measured process data at time interval T and compares the measured process data to the expression to determine whether the expression is true or false and based on whether the expression is true or false identifies operational risk and/or near-miss risk that would otherwise be unknown or concealed in parameters P, whereby said operational risk and/or near-miss risk is used for strategic corrective action; and a display that presents the expression on the dynamic risk fault tree as a node over a specified time period and wherein the node is displayed in one configuration when the expression is true and a different configuration when the expression is false; wherein said system continuously and autonomously, operates contemporaneous with said manufacturing operation.
2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising two or more expressions each comprising separate nodes on the dynamic risk, fault tree, wherein, the user previously designated a relationship between the expressions and the relationship is displayed on the dynamic risk fault tree.
3. The system of claim 2 , wherein a link is a parent-child link.
4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user previously identified one expression as a parent having a relationship parent-child relationship with two or more expressions and the relationships are displayed on the dynamic risk fault tree.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the process data is either an analog signal or a two-state signal.
6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the process data is not communicated outside the manufacturing operation.
7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the system operates perpetually without an operator.
8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the strategic corrective action comprises a recommendation previously uploaded by the user of the system and the recommendation is displayed.
9. A method for analyzing risk levels in a manufacturing operation using a dynamic risk fault tree, the method comprising: collecting measured process data, comprising: data automatically collected by a data collection component, located within said manufacturing operation, in either (a) real-time or (b) from an archive server or both, collecting long-term process data for a period preceding the collecting measured data, identifying risk and/or near-miss risk of said manufacturing operation that would otherwise be unknown or concealed in parameters P and/or groups G of said parameters P of process data by comparing the measured process data to an expression that is either true or false; and displaying said risk or near-miss risk in a graphic that visually reports whether the expression is true or false with a variable visual indicator corresponding to whether the expression is true or false; wherein said method is performed continuously and autonomously.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising comparing the measured process data to two or more expressions that are each either true or false.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the two or more expressions are related by time temperature or proximity.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
March 18, 2019
July 7, 2020
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.