In a network of autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, an alert may be triggered when one of the vehicles switches from autonomous to manual mode. The alert may be communicated to nearby autonomous vehicles so that drivers of those vehicles may become aware of a potentially unpredictable manual driver nearby. Drivers of autonomous vehicles who may have become disengaged (e.g., sleeping, reading, talking, etc.) during autonomous driving may become re-engaged upon noticing the alert. A re-engaged driver may choose to switch his/her own vehicle from autonomous to manual mode in order to appropriately react to an unpredictable nearby manual driver. In additional or alternative embodiments, the alert may be triggered or intensified when indications of impairment of a nearby driver or malfunction of a nearby vehicle are detected.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A computer-implemented method for re-engaging a disengaged operator of a vehicle having one or more autonomous features, the method comprising: receiving, at a processor within a first vehicle operating in an autonomous mode, an indication that a nearby second vehicle is operating in a manual mode, wherein the first vehicle and the second vehicle are part of a vehicle network in which signals may be transmitted and received between vehicles; triggering, by the processor, an alert to an operator or passenger of the first vehicle operating in the autonomous mode, the alert indicating that the second vehicle is operating in the manual mode, and the alert including a notification, provided via a user interface, of an option to switch the first vehicle from an autonomous mode to a manual mode; receiving, by the processor, an indication of a selection, via the user interface, by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle, of the option included in the alert to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode; switching, by the processor, the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle; and in response to the switching of the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode, ceasing the alert.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indication received by the first vehicle further indicates that the second vehicle has switched operational modes from a prior autonomous or semi-autonomous mode to a current manual mode.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indication that the nearby second vehicle is operating in the manual mode further indicates that the second vehicle is driving erratically, and further comprising: triggering, by the processor, an elevated alert to the operator or passenger of the first vehicle indicating that the second vehicle is driving erratically.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indication that the nearby second vehicle is operating in the manual mode further indicates that the second vehicle is malfunctioning, and further comprising: triggering, by the processor, an elevated alert to the operator or passenger of the first vehicle indicating that the second vehicle is malfunctioning.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alert is configured to wake an operator or passenger of the first vehicle who is asleep.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to a dismissal of the alert by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle to switch operational modes.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, by the processor within the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle has switched from operating in the manual mode to operating the autonomous or semi-autonomous mode; and ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle has switched from operating in the manual mode to operating in the autonomous or semi-autonomous mode.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, by the processor within the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby; and ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby.
10. An electronic device for re-engaging a disengaged operator of a vehicle having one or more autonomous features, comprising: a transceiver configured to communicate data via at least one network connection; a memory configured to store non-transitory computer executable instructions; and a processor configured to interface with the transceiver and the memory, and configured to execute the non-transitory computer executable instructions to cause the processor to: receive, at a first vehicle in an autonomous mode, an indication that a nearby second vehicle is operating in a manual mode, wherein the first vehicle and the second vehicle are part of a vehicle network in which signals may be transmitted and received between vehicles; trigger an alert to an operator or passenger of the first vehicle operating in the autonomous mode, the alert indicating that the second vehicle is operating in the manual mode, and the alert including a notification, provided via a user interface, of an option to switch the first vehicle from an autonomous mode to a manual mode; receive an indication of a selection, via the user interface, by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle, of the option included in the alert to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode; switch the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle; and in response to the switching of the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode, cease the alert.
11. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the indication received by the first vehicle further indicates that the second vehicle has switched operational modes from a prior autonomous or semi-autonomous mode to a current manual mode.
12. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the indication that the nearby second vehicle is in the manual mode further indicates that the second vehicle is driving erratically, and wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: trigger an elevated alert to the operator or passenger of the first vehicle indicating that the second vehicle is driving erratically.
13. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the indication that the nearby second vehicle is in the manual mode further indicates that the second vehicle is malfunctioning, and wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: trigger an elevated alert to the operator or passenger of the first vehicle indicating that the second vehicle is malfunctioning.
14. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the alert is configured to wake an operator or passenger of the first vehicle who is asleep.
15. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: cease the alert in response to a dismissal of the alert by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle.
16. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: cease the alert in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle to switch operational modes.
17. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: receive, at the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle has switched from operating in the manual mode to operating in the autonomous or semi-autonomous mode; and cease the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle has switched from operating in the manual mode to operating in the autonomous or semi-autonomous mode.
18. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to: receive, at the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby; and cease the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby.
19. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a set of instructions, executable by a processor, for re-engaging a disengaged operator of a vehicle having one or more autonomous features, the instructions comprising: receiving, within a first vehicle operating in an autonomous mode, an indication that a nearby second vehicle is operating in a manual mode, wherein the first vehicle and the second vehicle are part of a vehicle network in which signals may be transmitted and received between vehicles; triggering an alert to an operator or passenger of the first vehicle operating in the autonomous mode, the alert indicating that the second vehicle is operating in the manual mode, and the alert including a notification, provided via a user interface, of an option to switch the first vehicle from an autonomous mode to a manual mode; receiving an indication of a selection, via the user interface, by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle, of the option included in the alert to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode; switching the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle and in response to the switching of the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode, ceasing the alert.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , the instructions further comprising one or more of: ceasing the alert in response to a dismissal of the alert by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle, or ceasing the alert in response to the selection by the operator or passenger of the first vehicle to switch operational modes.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
May 25, 2017
August 4, 2020
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.