Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. One method may include a wireless communications device determining an inter-modulation distortion value between simultaneous communications on a first configuration of a first radio access network and a second configuration of a second radio access network, and dynamically switching between a non-standalone mode and a standalone mode of operation, based on the inter-modulation distortion value and a quality of service requirement for the standalone mode. The wireless communications device may also provide for time division multiplexing communications on a first RAT and a second RAT wherein only the first or second RAT is active during a period of time, and wherein the first RAT is an anchor for the second RAT.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method of wireless communication comprising: determining an inter-modulation distortion (IMD) value between communications on a first configuration of a first radio access network (RAN) and communications on a second configuration of a second RAN when transmissions occur simultaneously on the first RAN and the second RAN; and dynamically switching between a non-standalone (NSA) mode and a standalone (SA) mode of operation of at least one of the first and second RANs, wherein the switching is based on the IMD value and a quality of service (QoS) requirement for the SA mode.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first configuration of the first RAN comprises a band configuration that is different from a band configuration of the second RAN.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first configuration of the first RAN communicates on a frequency division duplex (FDD) band and the second configuration of the second RAN communicates on a time division duplex (TDD) band.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein voice is communicated on the first configuration of the first RAN and data is communicated on the second configuration of the second RAN.
5. The method of claim 2 , wherein signaling data is communicated on the first configuration of the first RAN and high rate data is communicated on the second configuration of the second RAN.
6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: detecting a UE is in the coverage of at least one radio frequency (RF) band combination of the first RAN and second RAN, wherein said at least one combination triggers IMD; and dynamically switching at least one of the first and second RANs from NSA mode to SA mode based on said detecting.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein a serving frequency is on a first band of the first RAN, further comprising: determining a UE is in the coverage of a second band of the second RAN; triggering a dynamic switch of the second network from NSA mode to SA mode; and performing handover from the serving frequency of the first band of the first RAN to a serving frequency of the second band of the second RAN.
8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising: determining the UE has moved to the first band of the first RAN; performing a handover from the second band of the second RAN to the first band of the first RAN; and triggering a dynamic switch of the second RAN from SA mode to NSA mode.
9. The method of claim 2 , further comprising blacklisting RF band combinations of the first RAN and the second RAN that trigger IMD, wherein said blacklisting comprises suspending communication on the blacklisted RF band combinations.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein dynamic switching between NSA mode and SA mode does not require a UE to detach from a NSA radio access network and re-attach in SA mode.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a UE is in the coverage of RF band combinations of at least one radio frequency (RF) band of the first RAN and second RAN, wherein said at least one combination triggers IMD; determining a combination of the first RAN operating in a first band and the second RAN operating in a second band triggers IMD, and a combination of the first RAN operating on a first band and the second RAN operating in a third band does not trigger IMD; determining IMD is triggered when UE moves from coverage of the second RAN operating on the third band to a coverage area of the second RAN operating on the second band; de-activating the second RAN on the third band; triggering a dynamic switch from NSA mode to SA mode; and performing a handover from the second RAN operating on the third band to the third RAN operating on the second band.
12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: determining the UE has re-entered coverage of the second RAN operating on the third band and the first RAN remains in coverage of the first band; performing handover from the second RAN operating on the third band to the first RAN operating on the first band; performing a dynamic switch of the second RAN from SA mode to NSA mode; and configuring the second RAN on the third band.
13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising: determining the UE has re-entered coverage of the second RAN operation on the third band and the first RAN remains in coverage of the first band; performing handover of the second network from the second band to the third band of the second network; and performing a dynamic switch from SA mode to NSA mode with the first network operating as an anchor on the first band.
14. An apparatus for wireless communication comprising: a processor; memory in communication with the processor, and instructions stored in the memory and operable, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to: determine an inter-modulation distortion (IMD) value between communications on a first configuration of a first radio access network (RAN) and communications on a second configuration of a second RAN when transmissions occur simultaneously on the first RAN and the second RAN; and dynamically switch between a non-standalone (NSA) mode and a standalone (SA) mode of operation of at least one of the first and second RANs, wherein the dynamically switching is based on the IMD value and a quality of service (QoS) requirement for the SA mode.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the first configuration of the first RAN comprises a band configuration that is different from a band configuration of the second RAN.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the first configuration of the first RAN communicates on a frequency division duplex (FDD) band and the second configuration of the second RAN communicates on a time division duplex (TDD) band.
17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein signaling data is communicated on the first configuration of the first RAN and high rate data is communicated on the second configuration of the second RAN.
18. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to: detect a UE is in the coverage of at least one radio frequency (RF) band combination of the first RAN and second RAN, wherein said at least one combination triggers IMD; and dynamically switch at least one of the first and second RANs from NSA mode to SA mode based on said detecting.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein a serving frequency is on a first band of the first RAN, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine a UE is in the coverage of a second band of the second RAN; trigger a dynamic switch of the second network from NSA mode to SA mode; and perform handover from the serving frequency of the first band of the first RAN to a serving frequency of the second band of the second RAN.
20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the processor is further configured to: determine the UE has moved to the first band of the first RAN; perform a handover from the second band of the second RAN to the first band of the first RAN; and trigger a dynamic switch of the second RAN from SA mode to NSA mode.
21. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to blacklist RF band combinations of the first RAN and the second RAN that trigger IMD, wherein said blacklisting comprises suspending communication on the blacklisted RF band combinations.
22. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein dynamic switching between NSA mode and SA mode does not require a UE to detach from a NSA radio access network and re-attach in SA mode.
23. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the processor is further configured to: determine a UE is in the coverage of RF band combinations of at least one radio frequency (RF) band of the first RAN and second RAN, wherein said at least one combination triggers IMD; determine a combination of the first RAN operating in a first band and the second RAN operating in a second band triggers IMD, and a combination of the first RAN operating on a first band and the second RAN operating in a third band does not trigger IMD; determine IMD is triggered when UE moves from coverage of the second RAN operating on the third band to a coverage area of the second RAN operating on the second band; de-activate the second RAN on the third band; trigger a dynamic switch from NSA mode to SA mode; and perform a handover from the second RAN operating on the third band to the third RAN operating on the second band.
24. The apparatus of claim 23 , wherein the processor is further configured to: determine the UE has re-entered coverage of the second RAN operating on the third band and the first RAN remains in coverage of the first band; perform handover from the second RAN operating on the third band to the first RAN operating on the first band; perform a dynamic switch of the second RAN from SA mode to NSA mode; and configuring the second RAN on the third band.
25. The apparatus of claim 24 , wherein the processor is further configured to: determine the UE has re-entered coverage of the second RAN operation on the third band and the first RAN remains in coverage of the first band; perform handover of the second network from the second band to the third band of the second network; and perform a dynamic switch from SA mode to NSA mode with the first network operating as an anchor on the first band.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
August 7, 2018
January 12, 2021
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.