Control systems and methods for securely authenticating and validating a control system. The control system may include a plurality of dependent control nodes and master control nodes. Each dependent control node is communicatively coupled to one or more peripheral devices. Each control node maintains a unit level distributed ledger, where each unit level distributed ledger includes information from corresponding peripheral devices. Each control node may transmit a portion of the unit level distributed ledger to a master control node. Each master control node may maintain a system level distributed ledger that includes information from the corresponding unit level distributed ledgers. Each master node may transmit a portion of the system level distributed ledger to a central node that maintains a separate secure distributed ledger. The master node may authenticate the control system based on the received portion of the system level distributed ledgers and the secure distributed ledgers.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing a respective received system level distributed ledger with the respective central distributed ledger, wherein the braided ring network controls an operation of a machine, and the machine is operated based on the comparison.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising updating the unit level distributed ledgers, system level distributed ledgers, and the central distributed ledgers subsequent the operation of the machine.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the peripheral device is a sensor or actuator.
6. The method of claim 2, wherein the machine is a gas turbine and the operation is starting the gas turbine.
7. The method of claim 4 further comprising, at the control node, comparing a portion of the respective device level distributed ledger with the respective unit level distributed ledger and operating a machine based on the comparison.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising, at the master control node, comparing a portion of respective unit level distributed ledger with the respective system level distributed ledger and operating a machine based on the comparison.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the unit level distributed ledger comprises a hash.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the system level distributed ledger comprises a hash.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of transmitting the portion of the unit level distributed ledger to the respective one of the plurality of master control nodes includes encrypting a message with one of a private key or public key.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of transmitting the portion of the system level distributed ledger to the central processor includes encrypting a message with one of a private key or public key.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the unit level distributed ledger comprises a digital certificate and data from at least a preceding engine start, and wherein the step of transmitting the portion of the unit level distributed ledger to the respective one of the plurality of master control nodes further comprises updating the unit level distributed ledger.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the data is selected from the group consisting of manufacturer, serial number of a smart node, software configuration, date of manufacture, date of qualification, public key and a preceding hash.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the step of updating the unit level distributed ledger further comprises deleting a preceding block from the unit level distributed ledger.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
February 22, 2019
September 27, 2022
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.