In an embodiment, a computer-implemented method for tracking source code deployments, the method comprises receiving an event descriptor, the event descriptor indicating that a source code repository is updated with a source code integration; retrieving a deployment description associated with the source code repository; comparing the event descriptor with the deployment description to determine whether the source code integration needs to be deployed; in response to determining that the source code integration needs to be deployed, deploying the source code integration; upon completion of the source code deployment, communicating deployment information corresponding to the completed source code deployment to a tracking system, the deployment information comprising at least a deployment identifier, and a source code integration identifier, the tracking system configured to utilize the source code integration identifier to query one or more external systems and automatically retrieve further information associated with the source code integration.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining that the source code integration is ready to be promoted to the production environment is based on determining that a deployment descriptor associated with the source code integration comprises one of a pending status or a queued status.
This invention relates to automated software deployment systems, specifically methods for determining when a source code integration is ready to be promoted to a production environment. The problem addressed is ensuring reliable and automated promotion of code changes while minimizing human intervention and errors. The method involves analyzing a deployment descriptor associated with a source code integration to determine its readiness for production deployment. The deployment descriptor is a metadata file or configuration that tracks the state of the integration. The system checks whether this descriptor contains a "pending" or "queued" status, indicating that the integration has passed necessary validation checks and is awaiting deployment. These statuses signify that the integration has met predefined criteria, such as successful testing, code review, or compliance checks, making it eligible for promotion. The method may also include additional steps such as validating the deployment descriptor, verifying dependencies, or confirming that no critical errors exist in the integration. Once the descriptor is confirmed to have a pending or queued status, the system automatically triggers the promotion process, ensuring seamless and error-free deployment to the production environment. This approach reduces manual oversight, accelerates deployment cycles, and improves software release reliability.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein causing the client device to display the first user interface comprises causing the first user interface to display a last source code integration that is currently deployed in the production environment.
This invention relates to software development systems that manage source code integrations in production environments. The problem addressed is the need for developers to quickly access and verify the most recent deployed code version in a production environment, ensuring alignment between development and live systems. The method involves a computer-implemented system that displays a user interface on a client device. This interface presents the last source code integration that is currently deployed in the production environment. The system retrieves this information from a deployment tracking system, which monitors and records the status of code deployments. The user interface provides developers with immediate visibility into the production state, reducing errors caused by outdated or mismatched code versions. The method may also include additional features such as displaying deployment history, version comparisons, or rollback options. The system ensures that developers can efficiently verify and manage production deployments, improving software reliability and reducing downtime. The focus is on real-time synchronization between development workflows and live production environments.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein causing the client device to display the second user interface comprises causing the second user interface to display an option to view issues associated with commits in the list of commits that were made between the last deployed source code integration in the production environment and the promoted source code integration to the production environment.
This invention relates to software development tools, specifically systems for managing and visualizing code changes in version control systems. The problem addressed is the difficulty developers face in tracking and understanding the impact of code changes between different deployment states, particularly when identifying issues associated with specific commits in a codebase. The method involves displaying a user interface that presents a list of commits made to a code repository. The commits are filtered to show only those between a last deployed version of the source code in a production environment and a promoted version of the source code that is scheduled for deployment. The user interface includes an option to view issues associated with these commits, allowing developers to quickly identify and analyze problems linked to specific code changes. This helps streamline debugging and quality assurance processes by providing a clear view of the changes and their potential impact on the production environment. The system may also include additional features such as displaying commit metadata, commit authors, and timestamps to further assist in tracking and resolving issues. The method is implemented using a client-server architecture, where a server processes the commit data and generates the user interface for display on a client device.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the preview of changes comprises a summary of issues related to commits in the list of commits that were made between the last deployed source code integration in the production environment and the promoted source code integration to the production environment.
This invention relates to software development and deployment, specifically to a method for providing a preview of changes in source code integrations before deployment to a production environment. The problem addressed is the need for developers and stakeholders to understand the impact and potential issues of code changes before they are deployed, reducing risks and improving decision-making. The method involves analyzing a list of commits made between the last deployed source code integration and the current promoted integration intended for production. The preview includes a summary of issues related to these commits, such as bugs, vulnerabilities, or other problems identified during development or testing. This summary helps users assess the stability and quality of the upcoming deployment, allowing them to address critical issues before they reach production. The method may also include additional features, such as categorizing issues by severity, providing links to detailed reports, or highlighting commits that introduce breaking changes. By presenting this information in a structured and accessible way, the method ensures that stakeholders can make informed decisions about deployment readiness. The goal is to enhance collaboration, reduce deployment failures, and improve the overall software development lifecycle.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein causing the client device to display the first user interface comprises displaying multiple code integrations that are eligible for promotion from the source environment to the production environment.
This invention relates to software deployment systems, specifically methods for managing code integrations between development and production environments. The problem addressed is the need to efficiently identify and promote eligible code integrations from a source (e.g., development or staging) environment to a production environment while minimizing errors and ensuring compatibility. The method involves a computer-implemented process that displays a user interface on a client device, showing multiple code integrations that are eligible for promotion. These integrations are evaluated based on predefined criteria, such as successful testing, dependency resolution, or compliance checks. The system may also provide additional details, such as version history, dependencies, or risk assessments, to assist users in making informed decisions. The interface allows users to select and promote eligible integrations to the production environment, streamlining the deployment process while maintaining system stability. The method may also include tracking the promotion status and logging changes for audit purposes. This approach reduces manual intervention, improves deployment accuracy, and ensures smoother transitions between environments.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the request to approve the source code revision comprises a repository identifier for the source code revision and a deployment identifier associated with the last deployed source code revision.
This invention relates to automated source code revision approval systems in software development environments. The problem addressed is ensuring that source code revisions are properly validated and approved before deployment, particularly in collaborative development settings where multiple contributors may submit changes. The system automates the approval process by generating and transmitting approval requests that include specific identifiers to track the revision and its deployment context. The method involves receiving a request to approve a source code revision, where the request includes a repository identifier for the revision and a deployment identifier associated with the last deployed revision. The repository identifier uniquely identifies the source code revision within its repository, while the deployment identifier tracks the revision's relationship to previously deployed code. This ensures that approvals are contextually accurate, preventing conflicts or inconsistencies in the deployment pipeline. The system may also validate the request by verifying the identifiers against stored records before proceeding with approval. This approach enhances traceability and reduces errors in the deployment process by maintaining clear links between revisions and their deployment history. The method is implemented as part of a broader system for managing source code changes, where approvals are automated based on predefined criteria or manual review workflows.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the request to approve the source code revision comprises a revision identifier for the source code revision and an environment identifier for the production environment.
A system and method for managing source code revisions in a production environment involves automating the approval process for deploying code changes. The method addresses the challenge of ensuring controlled and traceable deployment of source code revisions to production systems, reducing human error and improving auditability. The system receives a request to approve a specific source code revision, where the request includes a unique revision identifier and an environment identifier specifying the target production environment. The system verifies the request by cross-referencing the revision identifier with a stored record of approved revisions, ensuring only authorized changes are deployed. The environment identifier ensures the revision is deployed to the correct production environment, preventing misrouting. The method may also include validating the revision against predefined deployment rules, such as compatibility checks or security policies, before approval. Once validated, the system triggers the deployment process, logging the action for audit purposes. This approach enhances deployment reliability and traceability in software development workflows.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, further comprising displaying, at the client device, a last source code revision that is currently deployed in the production environment.
This invention relates to software development and deployment, specifically addressing the challenge of tracking and displaying the most recent source code revision that is actively deployed in a production environment. The method involves a computer-implemented process that retrieves and presents this information to a client device, ensuring developers and operators have visibility into the exact version of the codebase currently in use. The system integrates with version control systems to identify the latest revision that has been deployed, distinguishing it from unreleased or pending changes. This helps prevent discrepancies between development and production environments, reducing errors and improving deployment reliability. The method may also include additional steps such as validating the deployment status, comparing revisions, or generating alerts if inconsistencies are detected. By providing real-time visibility into the production environment's codebase, the invention enhances collaboration and reduces the risk of deploying outdated or incorrect versions. The solution is particularly valuable in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, where tracking deployed revisions is critical for maintaining system stability and traceability.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, further comprising displaying an option to view issues associated with commits in the list of commits that were made between the last deployed source code revision in the production environment and the promoted source code revision to the production environment.
This invention relates to software development tools, specifically systems for tracking and visualizing code changes in version control systems. The problem addressed is the difficulty developers face in identifying and reviewing issues associated with specific code commits, particularly when deploying updates to a production environment. The invention provides a method to enhance visibility into code changes by displaying an option to view issues linked to commits made between the last deployed revision and the next revision promoted for deployment. This allows developers to quickly assess potential risks or problems before promoting code to production. The method involves analyzing commit history, identifying relevant issues (such as bugs, pull requests, or code reviews) tied to those commits, and presenting them in an accessible interface. The system ensures that developers have comprehensive context about code changes, reducing deployment errors and improving software quality. The invention integrates with existing version control and issue-tracking systems, providing a seamless workflow for teams managing complex codebases.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein the option for promoting the source code revision from the source environment to the production environment comprises a selectable element that, when selected, causes promotion of the source code revision from the source environment to the production environment.
This invention relates to software deployment systems, specifically methods for promoting source code revisions from a source environment to a production environment. The problem addressed is the need for a streamlined, user-friendly mechanism to facilitate the deployment of code changes while minimizing manual intervention and reducing deployment errors. The method involves a computer-implemented process where a source code revision is prepared in a source environment, such as a development or staging environment. A promotion option is provided as a selectable element, such as a button or link, within a user interface. When this element is selected, the system automatically triggers the promotion of the source code revision from the source environment to the production environment. This automation ensures consistency and reduces the risk of human error during deployment. The promotion process may include additional steps, such as validation checks, dependency resolution, or environment-specific configurations, to ensure the code revision is properly deployed. The system may also provide feedback or status updates to the user throughout the promotion process, confirming successful deployment or alerting to any issues encountered. This approach improves efficiency by eliminating manual deployment steps and provides a clear, intuitive interface for developers and operators to manage code deployments. The invention is particularly useful in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, where rapid and reliable code promotion is essential.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein determining that the source code integration is ready to be promoted to the production environment comprises determining that the status of a deployment descriptor comprises one of a pending status or a queued status.
A system for managing software deployment automates the promotion of source code changes from a development environment to a production environment. The system monitors the status of deployment descriptors associated with source code integrations to determine readiness for promotion. A deployment descriptor is a metadata file that tracks the state of a code integration, including whether it is pending or queued for deployment. The system evaluates these status indicators to decide whether the integration is ready to proceed to production. This ensures that only properly prepared and validated code changes are deployed, reducing the risk of errors in the production environment. The system may also include additional checks, such as verifying that all dependencies are resolved or that required approvals have been obtained, before allowing a promotion. By automating these checks, the system improves deployment efficiency and reliability, minimizing manual intervention and potential human error. The system is particularly useful in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, where rapid and accurate deployments are critical.
17. The system of claim 15, wherein displaying the preview of changes comprises causing the client device to display the list of commits that were made between a currently deployed source code integration in the production environment and the promoted source code integration to the production environment.
This invention relates to software deployment systems, specifically for visualizing changes between different versions of source code in a production environment. The problem addressed is the lack of transparency in tracking and displaying incremental changes made to source code during deployment, which can lead to errors, inefficiencies, and difficulties in debugging. The system includes a deployment module that manages the promotion of source code integrations from a staging environment to a production environment. It also includes a preview module that generates and displays a preview of changes between the currently deployed source code and the promoted source code. The preview module retrieves commit data from a version control system, identifying all commits made between the two versions. The system then displays a list of these commits, allowing users to review the specific changes before they are fully deployed. This helps developers and operators verify the impact of updates, reducing deployment risks and improving system reliability. The system may also include a user interface that allows users to interact with the preview, such as filtering or expanding commit details. The deployment module ensures that only verified and approved changes are promoted to production, while the preview module provides real-time visibility into the deployment process.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
December 11, 2020
December 6, 2022
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.