Patentable/Patents/US-20250297915-A1
US-20250297915-A1

Shaking Force Optimization System, Shaking Force Optimization Method, and Arithmetic Device

PublishedSeptember 25, 2025
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Inventorsnot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

A excitation force optimization system () includes an exciter () that excites a structure (), one or more accelerometers () that are installed in the structure () and measure vibration of the structure () every time the structure () is excited, and an arithmetic device () that derives a frequency response function on the basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure () and controls an excitation force of the exciter () on the basis of the frequency response function.

Patent Claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

. An excitation force optimization system that optimizes an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the excitation force optimization system comprising: an exciter that excites the structure; one or more accelerometers that are installed in the structure and measure vibration of the structure every time the structure is excited; and an arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function on a basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure and controls an excitation force of the exciter on a basis of the frequency response function.

2

. The excitation force optimization system according to, wherein the arithmetic device amplifies the excitation force when the frequency response function is a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial, and when the frequency response function is a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial, the second frequency response function is recorded and the excitation force is amplified, and when the frequency response function is a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears, the third frequency response function is discarded, and an average value of the second frequency response function is output.

3

. An arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function of a structure, the arithmetic device comprising: a reception unit that receives a measurement value of vibration of the structure from one or more accelerometers; an arithmetic unit that derives the frequency response function on a basis of the measurement value and controls an excitation force of an exciter on a basis of the frequency response function; a display unit that displays and visualizes the frequency response function; and a recording unit that records the frequency response function.

4

. The arithmetic device according to, wherein the arithmetic unit amplifies the excitation force when the frequency response function is a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial, and when the frequency response function is a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial, the second frequency response function is recorded and the excitation force is amplified, and when the frequency response function is a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears, the third frequency response function is discarded, and an average value of the second frequency response function is output.

5

. An excitation force optimization method for optimizing an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the method comprising:

Detailed Description

Complete technical specification and implementation details from the patent document.

The present invention relates to an excitation force optimization system, an excitation force optimization method, and an arithmetic device.

Conventionally, when a structure is designed, a natural frequency is measured by modal experiment so that resonance does not occur in the structure. The modal experiment (modal analysis) refers to an experiment of exciting any part of a structure and observing a response at a plurality of portions in order to know a natural frequency characteristic of the structure. The simplest and most common method of modal experiments is experiments with an impulse hammer and accelerometers. However, since the impulse hammer strikes the structure by human power, when the structure is a large structure like a civil engineering structure, the attenuation becomes large, and it becomes extremely difficult to measure an accurate frequency response function. Generally, an accurate frequency response function can be measured by amplifying an excitation force using a modal exciter, but in a large structure such as a civil engineering structure, when a strong excitation force by the modal exciter is applied, nonlinearity appears in the frequency response function, making it difficult to obtain an accurate modal experiment result. The excitation force refers to a force that applies vibration to the structure. The nonlinearity refers to a property that the relationship between the output and the input is not proportional.

For this reason, in the conventional modal experiment, a plurality of exciters with a small excitation force and an accelerometer with high accuracy capable of measuring a small excitation force are used so that the nonlinearity does not appear in the frequency response function. Non Patent Literature 1 describes a technique for more evenly dispersing, in a large structure, a load applied to the structure by using a plurality of exciters that apply a small excitation force to the structure instead of one exciter that applies a large excitation force to the structure.

Non Patent Literature 1: “Frequently Asked Questions Modal Shakers and Related Topics”, [online], [Searched on Apr. 13, 2022], the Internet <URL: https://www.modalshop.com/filelibrary/Modal%20Shaker%20FAQ%20revA.pdf>

However, there is a problem that the use of a highly accurate accelerometer and a plurality of exciters increases the cost.

An object of the present disclosure made in view of such circumstances is to provide an arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function of a structure, and an excitation force optimization system and an excitation force optimization method that optimize an excitation force in deriving the frequency response function of the structure.

In order to solve the above problem, an excitation force optimization system according to the present embodiment is an excitation force optimization system that optimizes an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the excitation force optimization system including: an exciter that excites the structure; one or more accelerometers that are installed in the structure and measure vibration of the structure every time the structure is excited; and an arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function on a basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure and controls an excitation force of the exciter on a basis of the frequency response function.

In order to solve the above problem, an excitation force optimization method according to the present embodiment is an excitation force optimization method for optimizing an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the method including: a step of amplifying, by an exciter, the excitation force stepwise and repeatedly exciting the structure; a step of measuring, by one or more accelerometers, vibration of the structure excited by the exciter; a step of deriving, by an arithmetic device, a frequency response function on a basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure; a step of, when a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial is derived and then a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial is derived by the arithmetic device, recording the second frequency response function; and a step of, when a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears is derived by the arithmetic device, discarding the third frequency response function and outputting a frequency response function obtained by averaging one or more of the second frequency response functions recorded.

In order to solve the above problem, an arithmetic device according to the present embodiment is an arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function of a structure, the arithmetic device including: a reception unit that receives a measurement value of vibration of the structure from one or more accelerometers; an arithmetic unit that derives the frequency response function on a basis of the measurement value and controls an excitation force of an exciter on a basis of the frequency response function; a display unit that displays and visualizes the frequency response function; and a recording unit that records the frequency response function.

With an excitation force optimization system according to the present disclosure, an optimum excitation force for a structure is automatically searched for, and thus an accurate frequency response function can be derived regardless of the skill and know-how of the engineer.

Hereinafter, modes for carrying out the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The present invention is not limited to the embodiment described below, and various modifications can be made within the scope of the gist of the present invention.

When an excitation force is applied to a large structure by a modal exciter, if an excitation force is not appropriate, nonlinearity is likely to appear in a frequency response function, and an erroneous frequency response function is likely to be measured. As a result of experiments by the inventor, it has been found that when the excitation force is in an appropriate range, the frequency response function has a small attenuation and a sharp rising peak, whereas when the excitation force is in an excessive range, a peak (pseudo peak) of the frequency response function appears in a frequency band in which the frequency response function does not exist. Accordingly, an excitation force optimization systemincluding an arithmetic flow for amplifying the excitation force stepwise (step amplification) and searching for the excitation force in which such a pseudo peak does not appear is proposed below.

is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of an excitation force optimization systemaccording to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As illustrated in, the excitation force optimization systemincludes an exciter, one or more accelerometers, and an arithmetic device. The excitation force optimization systemoptimizes the excitation force in deriving the frequency response function of the structure.

is a schematic diagram of an excitation force optimization system according to the embodiment of the present disclosure. As illustrated in, a structure (monitoring target)is a tube (tubular structure) and is attached to a support metalat both ends with a U-bolt. When the exciterapplies an excitation force to the structure, the structurevibrates. One or more accelerometers(-to-) are attached to the structure, and the one or more accelerometersmeasure vibration of the structure. A measurement value of vibration of the structureis transmitted to the arithmetic devicein a wired or wireless manner, and the arithmetic devicederives a frequency response function of the structurebased on the measurement value.

The exciterexcites the structure. The exciterfirst excites the structurewith an excessively small excitation force, and then amplifies the excitation force stepwise to repeatedly excite the structure. The exciteris a modal exciter. When the excitation force optimization systemis activated, the exciterexcites the structurewith an excessively small excitation force. As will be described later, the exciteramplifies (step amplifies) the excitation force stepwise in accordance with an instruction from the arithmetic deviceto excite the structure.

The one or more accelerometersare installed on the structureand measure vibration of the structureevery time the structureis excited. As illustrated in, the one or more accelerometersincludes n accelerometers-to-. The accelerometer-includes a measurement unit-that measures vibration of the structureand a transmission unit-that transmits a measurement value to a reception unitof the arithmetic device. The accelerometers-to-have similar configurations and functions.

The arithmetic devicederives the frequency response function on the basis of the measurement value of the vibration of the structure.is a graph illustrating a frequency response function in which the excitation force is in an appropriate range.is a graph illustrating a frequency response function in which the excitation force is excessive.illustrate an imaginary part of the frequency response function. As illustrated in, when the excitation force is in an appropriate range, the frequency response function has a sharp peak b with a small attenuation and a rise. On the other hand, as illustrated in, when the excitation force is in an excessive range, the frequency response function expresses a peak a1 (pseudo peak a1) of the frequency response function in the frequency band that does not exist in the frequency response function of, and a peak a2 lacking sharpness of rising appears in the frequency band in which the peak b appears in. In the frequency response functions illustrated in, the frequency response functions derived from respective measurement values of the n accelerometers are displayed in an overlapping manner.

The arithmetic devicecontrols the excitation force of the exciter on the basis of the frequency response function. In the present disclosure, trial refers to deriving a frequency response function by amplifying an excitation force in stages. (i) The arithmetic devicerepeatedly performs the trial a plurality of times (N times), and compares a plurality of frequency response functions recorded for each trial. When it is determined that the frequency response function is a first frequency response function A in which the frequency at which the peak of the frequency response function appears differs (has no reproducibility) depending on the number of times of trial, the arithmetic deviceamplifies the excitation force. (ii) When it is determined that the frequency response function is a second frequency response function B in which the frequency at which the peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant (has reproducibility) regardless of the number of times of trial, the arithmetic devicerecords the second frequency response function B and amplifies the excitation force. (iii) When it is determined that the frequency response function is a third frequency response function C in which the peak of the frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears, the arithmetic devicediscards the latest third frequency response function C and outputs the average value of one or more second frequency response functions B.

is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of an arithmetic device according to the embodiment of the present disclosure. As illustrated in, the arithmetic deviceincludes a reception unit, an arithmetic unit, a display unit, and a recording unit. The arithmetic devicederives a frequency response function of the structure. The arithmetic unitconstitutes a control arithmetic circuit (controller). The control arithmetic circuitmay be configured by dedicated hardware such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), may be configured by a processor, or may be configured to include both.

The reception unitreceives measurement values of the vibration frequency of the structurefrom the transmission units (-to-) of one or more accelerometers.

The arithmetic unitderives a frequency response function on the basis of the measurement value of the frequency of the structure, and controls the excitation force of the exciteron the basis of the frequency response function. (i) The arithmetic unitrepeatedly performs the trial a plurality of times (N times), and compares a plurality of frequency response functions recorded in the recording unitfor each trial. When it is determined that the frequency response function is the first frequency response function A in which the frequency at which the peak of the frequency response function appears differs (has no reproducibility) depending on the number of times of trial, the arithmetic unitamplifies the excitation force. (ii) When it is determined that the frequency response function is the second frequency response function B in which the frequency at which the peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than the first threshold appears is constant (has reproducibility) regardless of the number of times of trial, the arithmetic unitrecords the second frequency response function B and amplifies the excitation force. (iii) When it is determined that the frequency response function is the third frequency response function C in which the peak of the frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than the second threshold appears, the arithmetic unitdiscards the latest third frequency response function C and outputs the average value of one or more second frequency response functions B.

The display unitdisplays and visualizes the frequency response function. The display unitis a display. The display unitdisplays and visualizes all the frequency response functions on the display in order to determine whether the derived frequency response function is the first frequency response function A, the second frequency response function B, or the third frequency response function C.

The recording unitrecords the frequency response function. The recording unitoutputs the one or more second frequency response functions B to the arithmetic unitin response to a request from the arithmetic unitwhen the arithmetic unitaverages the one or more second frequency response functions B recorded.

are flowcharts illustrating an example of the excitation force optimization method executed by the excitation force optimization system according to the embodiment of the present disclosure.

In step S, the exciterexcites the structurewith an excessively small excitation force.

In step S, the measurement units-to-of the one or more accelerometersmeasure the vibration of the structure. The transmission units-to-of the one or more accelerometerstransmit measurement values of vibration of the structureto the reception unitof the arithmetic device.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicederives a frequency response function on the basis of the received measurement value, and causes the display unitof the arithmetic deviceto display the derived frequency response function.

In step S, the recording unitof the arithmetic devicerecords the derived frequency response function.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicedetermines whether or not the number of times of trial has reached N. When the number of times does not reach N, the process proceeds to step S, and when the number of times reaches N, the process proceeds to step S.

In step S, in accordance with an instruction from the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic device, the exciteramplifies the excitation force to excite the structure. Thereafter, the process returns to step S, and the measurement units-to-of the one or more accelerometersmeasure the vibration of the structure.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicecompares the frequency response functions recorded in the recording unit, and determines whether the derived frequency response function is the first frequency response function A or the second frequency response function B. If the frequency response function is the second frequency response function B, the process proceeds to step S. In the case of the first frequency response function A, the process proceeds to step S.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicerecords the derived second frequency response function B in the recording unitand displays the second frequency response function B on the display unit.

In step S, in accordance with an instruction from the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic device, the exciteramplifies the excitation force stepwise to excite the structure.

In step S, the measurement units-to-of the one or more accelerometersmeasure the vibration of the structure. The transmission units-to-of the one or more accelerometerstransmit measurement values of vibration of the structureto the reception unitof the arithmetic device.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicederives a frequency response function on the basis of the received measurement value, and causes the display unitof the arithmetic deviceto display the derived frequency response function.

In step S, the arithmetic unitof the arithmetic devicedetermines whether the derived frequency response function is the second frequency response function B or the third frequency response function C. If the frequency response function is the second frequency response function B, the process proceeds to step S. In the case of the third frequency response function C, the process proceeds to step S.

In step S, the latest third frequency response function C is discarded, and a frequency response function obtained by averaging one or more second frequency response functions B recorded in the recording unitis output.

In a modal experiment of a large structure, nonlinearity is likely to appear due to the influence of an excitation force, and an erroneous frequency response function is likely to be measured. For this reason, in order to obtain an accurate frequency response function, it is necessary to excite the large structure by controlling the excitation force to an optimum magnitude. The excitation force optimization systemaccording to the present disclosure has a system configuration that adjusts the excitation force by feeding back a stepwise amplification instruction of the excitation force to the exciteron the basis of information of the frequency response function derived from the measurement value of vibration of the large structure by one or more accelerometers. With the excitation force optimization system, since the system automatically searches for the optimum excitation force, an accurate frequency response function can be derived regardless of the skill and know-how of the engineer.

In order to cause the arithmetic deviceto function, it is also possible to use a computer capable of executing a program instruction.is a block diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of a computer that functions as the arithmetic device. Here, the computer that functions as the arithmetic devicemay be a general-purpose computer, a dedicated computer, a workstation, a personal computer (PC), an electronic note pad, or the like. The program instruction may be a program code, a code segment, or the like, for executing a necessary task.

As illustrated in, a computerincludes a processor, a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), and a storageas storage units, an input unit, an output unit, and a communication interface (I/F). The respective constituents are communicatively connected to each other via a bus.

The ROMstores various kinds of programs and various kinds of data. The RAMtemporarily stores a program or data as a working area. The storageis constituted by a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid state drive (SSD) and stores various kinds of programs including an operating system and various kinds of data. In the present disclosure, a program according to the present disclosure is stored in the ROMor the storage.

Specifically, the processoris a central processing unit (CPU), a micro processing unit (MPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), a system on a chip (SoC), or the like, and may be constituted by the same or different types of plurality of processors. The processorreads a program from the ROMor the storageand executes the program by using the RAMas a working area to perform control of each of the above-described components and various kinds of arithmetic processing. Note that at least part of these processing content may be implemented by hardware.

The program may be recorded in a recording medium readable by the arithmetic device. By using such a recording medium, the program can be installed in the arithmetic device. Here, the recording medium on which the program is recorded may be a non-transitory recording medium. The non-transitory recording medium is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) memory, or the like. In addition, the program may be downloaded from an external device via a network.

With regard to the above embodiment, the following supplementary notes are further disclosed.

(Supplement 1) An excitation force optimization system that optimizes an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the excitation force optimization system including: an exciter that excites the structure; one or more accelerometers that are installed in the structure and measure vibration of the structure every time the structure is excited; and an arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function on a basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure and controls an excitation force of the exciter on a basis of the frequency response function.

(Supplement 2) The excitation force optimization system according to supplementary note 1, in which the arithmetic device amplifies the excitation force when the frequency response function is a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial, and when the frequency response function is a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial, the second frequency response function is recorded and the excitation force is amplified, and when the frequency response function is a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears, the third frequency response function is discarded, and an average value of the second frequency response function is output.

(Supplement 3) An arithmetic device that derives a frequency response function of a structure, the arithmetic device including: a receiver that receives a measurement value of vibration of the structure from one or more accelerometers; a controller that derives the frequency response function on a basis of the measurement value and controls an excitation force of an exciter on a basis of the frequency response function; a display that displays and visualizes the frequency response function; and a memory that records the frequency response function.

(Supplement 4) The arithmetic device according to supplementary note 3, in which the controller amplifies the excitation force when the frequency response function is a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial, and when the frequency response function is a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial, the second frequency response function is recorded and the excitation force is amplified, and when the frequency response function is a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears, the third frequency response function is discarded, and an average value of the second frequency response function is output.

(Supplement 5) An excitation force optimization method for optimizing an excitation force in deriving a frequency response function of a structure, the method including: amplifying, by an exciter, the excitation force stepwise and repeatedly exciting the structure; measuring, by one or more accelerometers, vibration of the structure excited by the exciter; deriving, by an arithmetic device, a frequency response function on a basis of a measurement value of vibration of the structure; when a first frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function appears varies depending on a number of times of trial is derived and then a second frequency response function in which a frequency at which a peak of the frequency response function equal to or higher than a first threshold appears is constant regardless of the number of times of trial is derived by the arithmetic device, recording the second frequency response function; and when a third frequency response function in which a peak of a frequency response function that does not exist in the second frequency response function and is equal to or higher than a second threshold appears is derived by the arithmetic device, discarding the third frequency response function and outputting a frequency response function obtained by averaging one or more of the second frequency response functions recorded.

Although the above-described embodiments have been described as representative examples, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications and substitutions can be made within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, it should not be understood that the present invention is limited by the above-described embodiments, and various modifications or changes can be made without departing from the scope of the claims. For example, a plurality of configuration blocks described in the configuration diagram of the embodiment can be combined into one, or one configuration block can be divided.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

September 25, 2025

Inventors

Unknown

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “SHAKING FORCE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM, SHAKING FORCE OPTIMIZATION METHOD, AND ARITHMETIC DEVICE” (US-20250297915-A1). https://patentable.app/patents/US-20250297915-A1

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.