Patentable/Patents/US-20260143447-A1
US-20260143447-A1

Enhanced Solution Separation Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring for Positioning Engine

PublishedMay 21, 2026
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Aspects presented herein may enable a UE to eliminate low accuracy “subset positions” and/or “all-in-view position” from a solution separation (SS) receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) (SS RAIM) evaluation, thereby improving the computation efficiency for the SS RAIM. In one aspect, a UE estimates a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. The UE excludes a set of positions in the plurality of positions from an SS evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold, or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value. The UE performs the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions.

Patent Claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

at least one memory; and estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs; exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value; and perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. at least one processor coupled to the at least one memory, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to: . An apparatus for positioning at a user equipment (UE), comprising:

2

claim 1 estimate a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimate a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. . The apparatus of, wherein to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to:

3

claim 1 calculate the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions; and compare the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold. . The apparatus of, wherein the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is further configured to:

4

claim 1 compute a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions; and determine whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value. . The apparatus of, wherein the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is further configured to:

5

claim 1 . The apparatus of, wherein the SS evaluation is associated with SS-receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) (SS RAIM).

6

claim 1 compare a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions; and enable the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enable the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. . The apparatus of, wherein to perform the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to:

7

claim 6 . The apparatus of, wherein the first validated position corresponds to a first position of the UE estimated using all SVs in the list of SVs, wherein the WSS of the first position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the first position is a positive value.

8

claim 6 . The apparatus of, wherein a second validated position in the plurality of second validated positions corresponds to a second position of the UE estimated using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs, wherein the WSS of the second position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the second position is a positive value.

9

claim 1 measure signals from all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimate the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements. . The apparatus of, wherein to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to:

10

claim 1 determine that the WSS for each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold; wherein to exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to: exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation based on the determination that each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold. . The apparatus of, wherein the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is further configured to:

11

claim 1 output, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test. . The apparatus of, wherein the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is further configured to:

12

claim 11 transmit the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test; or store the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test. . The apparatus of, wherein to output the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to:

13

estimating a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs; excluding a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value; and performing, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. . A method of positioning at a user equipment (UE), comprising:

14

claim 13 estimating a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimating a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. . The method of, wherein estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs comprises:

15

claim 13 calculating the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions; and comparing the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold. . The method of, further comprising:

16

claim 13 computing a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions; and determining whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value. . The method of, further comprising:

17

claim 13 comparing a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions; and enabling the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enabling the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. . The method of, wherein performing the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions comprises:

18

claim 13 measuring signals from all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimating the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements. . The method of, wherein estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs comprises:

19

claim 13 outputting, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test. . The method of, further comprising:

20

estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs; exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value; and perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. . A computer-readable medium storing computer executable code at a user equipment (UE), the code when executed by at least one processor causes the at least one processor to:

Detailed Description

Complete technical specification and implementation details from the patent document.

The present disclosure relates generally to communication systems, and more particularly, to wireless communication involving positioning.

Wireless communication systems are widely deployed to provide various telecommunication services such as telephony, video, data, messaging, and broadcasts. Typical wireless communication systems may employ multiple-access technologies capable of supporting communication with multiple users by sharing available system resources. Examples of such multiple-access technologies include code division multiple access (CDMA) systems, time division multiple access (TDMA) systems, frequency division multiple access (FDMA) systems, orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) systems, single-carrier frequency division multiple access (SC-FDMA) systems, and time division synchronous code division multiple access (TD-SCDMA) systems.

These multiple access technologies have been adopted in various telecommunication standards to provide a common protocol that enables different wireless devices to communicate on a municipal, national, regional, and even global level. An example telecommunication standard is 5G New Radio (NR). 5G NR is part of a continuous mobile broadband evolution promulgated by Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) to meet new requirements associated with latency, reliability, security, scalability (e.g., with Internet of Things (IOT)), and other requirements. 5G NR includes services associated with enhanced mobile broadband (cMBB), massive machine type communications (mMTC), and ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC). Some aspects of 5G NR may be based on the 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard. There exists a need for further improvements in 5G NR technology. These improvements may also be applicable to other multi-access technologies and the telecommunication standards that employ these technologies.

Some telecommunication standards also provide positioning protocols and techniques that enable mobile network operators to provide high-accuracy location services to their subscribers. For example, 5G NR include various standards for network-based positioning that use signals and features of the 5G network to perform or improve the positioning of a device. There also exists a need for further improvements in these positioning protocols and techniques.

The following presents a simplified summary of one or more aspects in order to provide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects. This summary neither identifies key or critical elements of all aspects nor delineates the scope of any or all aspects. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.

In an aspect of the disclosure, a method, a computer-readable medium, and an apparatus are provided. The apparatus estimates a plurality of positions of a user equipment (UE) using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. The apparatus excludes a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value. The apparatus performs, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions.

To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or more aspects may include the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative features of the one or more aspects. These features are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of various aspects may be employed.

Aspects presented herein may improve the overall performance of solution separation (SS) receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) (SS RAIM) (or the overall performance of a positioning engine configured to perform SS RAIM) by enabling the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” calculated by the SS RAIM to be validated (e.g., by a position validator module) to eliminate certain low accuracy “subset positions” and/or “all-in-view position” from an SS evaluation. For example, in one aspect, a position validator module may be configured to check whether there is any outlier(s) in the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” based on whether their WSS follows a chi-square (Chi2) distribution, and also use a residual multi-path (MP) sign check to detect the outlier(s). As such, aspects presented herein may enable early exit for some fault modes of the SS RAIM, and also improve the computation efficiency for the SS RAIM. For example, based on validating the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions,” the SS RAIM may permit just high accuracy “subset positions” to participate the SS evaluation, thereby enabling a list of SVs to have a higher chance of passing the SS evaluation. Aspects presented herein may also enable the SS RAIM to have a less chance of selecting a wrong or improper SV to be excluded in a subsequent SS test.

The detailed description set forth below in connection with the drawings describes various configurations and does not represent the only configurations in which the concepts described herein may be practiced. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of various concepts. However, these concepts may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well known structures and components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring such concepts.

Several aspects of telecommunication systems are presented with reference to various apparatus and methods. These apparatus and methods are described in the following detailed description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings by various blocks, components, circuits, processes, algorithms, etc. (collectively referred to as “elements”). These elements may be implemented using electronic hardware, computer software, or any combination thereof. Whether such elements are implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system.

By way of example, an element, or any portion of an element, or any combination of elements may be implemented as a “processing system” that includes one or more processors. When multiple processors are implemented, the multiple processors may perform the functions individually or in combination. Examples of processors include microprocessors, microcontrollers, graphics processing units (GPUs), central processing units (CPUs), application processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computing (RISC) processors, systems on a chip (SoC), baseband processors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), state machines, gated logic, discrete hardware circuits, and other suitable hardware configured to perform the various functionality described throughout this disclosure. One or more processors in the processing system may execute software. Software, whether referred to as software, firmware, middleware, microcode, hardware description language, or otherwise, shall be construed broadly to mean instructions, instruction sets, code, code segments, program code, programs, subprograms, software components, applications, software applications, software packages, routines, subroutines, objects, executables, threads of execution, procedures, functions, or any combination thereof.

Accordingly, in one or more example aspects, implementations, and/or use cases, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or encoded as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media includes computer storage media. Storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, such computer-readable media can include a random-access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage, other magnetic storage devices, combinations of the types of computer-readable media, or any other medium that can be used to store computer executable code in the form of instructions or data structures that can be accessed by a computer. While aspects, implementations, and/or use cases are described in this application by illustration to some examples, additional or different aspects, implementations and/or use cases may come about in many different arrangements and scenarios. Aspects, implementations, and/or use cases described herein may be implemented across many differing platform types, devices, systems, shapes, sizes, and packaging arrangements. For example, aspects, implementations, and/or use cases may come about via integrated chip implementations and other non-module-component based devices (e.g., end-user devices, vehicles, communication devices, computing devices, industrial equipment, retail/purchasing devices, medical devices, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled devices, etc.). While some examples may or may not be specifically directed to use cases or applications, a wide assortment of applicability of described examples may occur. Aspects, implementations, and/or use cases may range a spectrum from chip-level or modular components to non-modular, non-chip-level implementations and further to aggregate, distributed, or original equipment manufacturer (OEM) devices or systems incorporating one or more techniques herein. In some practical settings, devices incorporating described aspects and features may also include additional components and features for implementation and practice of claimed and described aspect. For example, transmission and reception of wireless signals necessarily includes a number of components for analog and digital purposes (e.g., hardware components including antenna, RF-chains, power amplifiers, modulators, buffer, processor(s), interleaver, adders/summers, etc.). Techniques described herein may be practiced in a wide variety of devices, chip-level components, systems, distributed arrangements, aggregated or disaggregated components, end-user devices, etc. of varying sizes, shapes, and constitution.

Deployment of communication systems, such as 5G NR systems, may be arranged in multiple manners with various components or constituent parts. In a 5G NR system, or network, a network node, a network entity, a mobility element of a network, a radio access network (RAN) node, a core network node, a network element, or a network equipment, such as a base station (BS), or one or more units (or one or more components) performing base station functionality, may be implemented in an aggregated or disaggregated architecture. For example, a BS (such as a Node B (NB), evolved NB (CNB), NR BS, 5G NB, access point (AP), a transmission reception point (TRP), or a cell, etc.) may be implemented as an aggregated base station (also known as a standalone BS or a monolithic BS) or a disaggregated base station.

An aggregated base station may be configured to utilize a radio protocol stack that is physically or logically integrated within a single RAN node. A disaggregated base station may be configured to utilize a protocol stack that is physically or logically distributed among two or more units (such as one or more central or centralized units (CUs), one or more distributed units (DUs), or one or more radio units (RUs)). In some aspects, a CU may be implemented within a RAN node, and one or more DUs may be co-located with the CU, or alternatively, may be geographically or virtually distributed throughout one or multiple other RAN nodes. The DUs may be implemented to communicate with one or more RUs. Each of the CU, DU and RU can be implemented as virtual units, i.e., a virtual central unit (VCU), a virtual distributed unit (VDU), or a virtual radio unit (VRU).

Base station operation or network design may consider aggregation characteristics of base station functionality. For example, disaggregated base stations may be utilized in an integrated access backhaul (IAB) network, an open radio access network (O-RAN (such as the network configuration sponsored by the O-RAN Alliance)), or a virtualized radio access network (vRAN, also known as a cloud radio access network (C-RAN)). Disaggregation may include distributing functionality across two or more units at various physical locations, as well as distributing functionality for at least one unit virtually, which can enable flexibility in network design. The various units of the disaggregated base station, or disaggregated RAN architecture, can be configured for wired or wireless communication with at least one other unit.

1 FIG. 100 110 120 120 125 115 105 110 130 130 140 140 104 104 140 110 130 140 125 115 105 is a diagramillustrating an example of a wireless communications system and an access network. The illustrated wireless communications system includes a disaggregated base station architecture. The disaggregated base station architecture may include one or more CUsthat can communicate directly with a core networkvia a backhaul link, or indirectly with the core networkthrough one or more disaggregated base station units (such as a Near-Real Time (Near-RT) RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC)via an E2 link, or a Non-Real Time (Non-RT) RICassociated with a Service Management and Orchestration (SMO) Framework, or both). A CUmay communicate with one or more DUsvia respective midhaul links, such as an F1 interface. The DUsmay communicate with one or more RUsvia respective fronthaul links. The RUsmay communicate with respective UEsvia one or more radio frequency (RF) access links. In some implementations, the UEmay be simultaneously served by multiple RUs. Each of the units, i.e., the CUS, the DUs, the RUs, as well as the Near-RT RICs, the Non-RT RICs, and the SMO Framework, may include one or more interfaces or be coupled to one or more interfaces configured to receive or to transmit signals, data, or information (collectively, signals) via a wired or wireless transmission medium. Each of the units, or an associated processor or controller providing instructions to the communication interfaces of the units, can be configured to communicate with one or more of the other units via the transmission medium. For example, the units can include a wired interface configured to receive or to transmit signals over a wired transmission medium to one or more of the other units. Additionally, the units can include a wireless interface, which may include a receiver, a transmitter, or a transceiver (such as an RF transceiver), configured to receive or to transmit signals, or both, over a wireless transmission medium to one or more of the other units.

110 110 110 110 110 130 In some aspects, the CUmay host one or more higher layer control functions. Such control functions can include radio resource control (RRC), packet data convergence protocol (PDCP), service data adaptation protocol (SDAP), or the like. Each control function can be implemented with an interface configured to communicate signals with other control functions hosted by the CU. The CUmay be configured to handle user plane functionality (i.e., Central Unit-User Plane (CU-UP)), control plane functionality (i.e., Central Unit-Control Plane (CU-CP)), or a combination thereof. In some implementations, the CUcan be logically split into one or more CU-UP units and one or more CU-CP units. The CU-UP unit can communicate bidirectionally with the CU-CP unit via an interface, such as an E1 interface when implemented in an O-RAN configuration. The CUcan be implemented to communicate with the DU, as necessary, for network control and signaling.

130 140 130 130 130 110 The DUmay correspond to a logical unit that includes one or more base station functions to control the operation of one or more RUs. In some aspects, the DUmay host one or more of a radio link control (RLC) layer, a medium access control (MAC) layer, and one or more high physical (PHY) layers (such as modules for forward error correction (FEC) encoding and decoding, scrambling, modulation, demodulation, or the like) depending, at least in part, on a functional split, such as those defined by 3GPP. In some aspects, the DUmay further host one or more low PHY layers. Each layer (or module) can be implemented with an interface configured to communicate signals with other layers (and modules) hosted by the DU, or with the control functions hosted by the CU.

140 140 130 140 104 140 130 130 110 Lower-layer functionality can be implemented by one or more RUs. In some deployments, an RU, controlled by a DU, may correspond to a logical node that hosts RF processing functions, or low-PHY layer functions (such as performing fast Fourier transform (FFT), inverse FFT (IFFT), digital beamforming, physical random access channel (PRACH) extraction and filtering, or the like), or both, based at least in part on the functional split, such as a lower layer functional split. In such an architecture, the RU(s)can be implemented to handle over the air (OTA) communication with one or more UEs. In some implementations, real-time and non-real-time aspects of control and user plane communication with the RU(s)can be controlled by the corresponding DU. In some scenarios, this configuration can enable the DU(s)and the CUto be implemented in a cloud-based RAN architecture, such as a vRAN architecture.

105 105 105 190 110 130 140 125 105 111 The SMO Frameworkmay be configured to support RAN deployment and provisioning of non-virtualized and virtualized network elements. For non-virtualized network elements, the SMO Frameworkmay be configured to support the deployment of dedicated physical resources for RAN coverage requirements that may be managed via an operations and maintenance interface (such as an O1 interface). For virtualized network elements, the SMO Frameworkmay be configured to interact with a cloud computing platform (such as an open cloud (O-Cloud)) to perform network element life cycle management (such as to instantiate virtualized network elements) via a cloud computing platform interface (such as an O2 interface). Such virtualized network elements can include, but are not limited to, CUs, DUs, RUsand Near-RT RICs. In some implementations, the SMO Frameworkcan communicate with a hardware aspect of a 4G RAN, such as an open eNB (O-cNB), via an O1 interface. Additionally, in some implementations, the SMO

105 140 105 115 105 Frameworkcan communicate directly with one or more RUsvia an O1 interface. The SMO Frameworkalso may include a Non-RT RICconfigured to support functionality of the SMO Framework.

115 125 115 125 125 110 130 125 The Non-RT RICmay be configured to include a logical function that enables non-real-time control and optimization of RAN elements and resources, artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) (AI/ML) workflows including model training and updates, or policy-based guidance of applications/features in the Near-RT RIC. The Non-RT RICmay be coupled to or communicate with (such as via an A1 interface) the Near-RT RIC. The Near-RT RICmay be configured to include a logical function that enables near-real-time control and optimization of RAN elements and resources via data collection and actions over an interface (such as via an E2 interface) connecting one or more CUs, one or more DUs, or both, as well as an O-eNB, with the Near-RT RIC.

125 115 125 105 115 115 125 115 105 1 In some implementations, to generate AI/ML models to be deployed in the Near-RT RIC, the Non-RT RICmay receive parameters or external enrichment information from external servers. Such information may be utilized by the Near-RT RICand may be received at the SMO Frameworkor the Non-RT RICfrom non-network data sources or from network functions. In some examples, the Non-RT RICor the Near-RT RICmay be configured to tune RAN behavior or performance. For example, the Non-RT RICmay monitor long-term trends and patterns for performance and employ AI/ML models to perform corrective actions through the SMO Framework(such as reconfiguration via) or via creation of RAN management policies (such as A1 policies).

110 130 140 102 102 110 130 140 102 102 120 104 102 140 104 104 140 140 104 102 104 At least one of the CU, the DU, and the RUmay be referred to as a base station. Accordingly, a base stationmay include one or more of the CU, the DU, and the RU(each component indicated with dotted lines to signify that each component may or may not be included in the base station). The base stationprovides an access point to the core networkfor a UE. The base stationmay include macrocells (high power cellular base station) and/or small cells (low power cellular base station). The small cells include femtocells, picocells, and microcells. A network that includes both small cell and macrocells may be known as a heterogeneous network. A heterogeneous network may also include Home Evolved Node Bs (eNBs) (HeNBs), which may provide service to a restricted group known as a closed subscriber group (CSG). The communication links between the RUsand the UEsmay include uplink (UL) (also referred to as reverse link) transmissions from a UEto an RUand/or downlink (DL) (also referred to as forward link) transmissions from an RUto a UE. The communication links may use multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) antenna technology, including spatial multiplexing, beamforming, and/or transmit diversity. The communication links may be through one or more carriers. The base station/UEsmay use spectrum up to Y MHz (e.g., 5, 10, 15, 20, 100, 400, etc. MHz) bandwidth per carrier allocated in a carrier aggregation of up to a total of Yx MHz (x component carriers) used for transmission in each direction. The carriers may or may not be adjacent to each other. Allocation of carriers may be asymmetric with respect to DL and UL (e.g., more or fewer carriers may be allocated for DL than for UL). The component carriers may include a primary component carrier and one or more secondary component carriers. A primary component carrier may be referred to as a primary cell (PCell) and a secondary component carrier may be referred to as a secondary cell (SCell).

104 158 158 158 Certain UEsmay communicate with each other using device-to-device (D2D) communication link. The D2D communication linkmay use the DL/UL wireless wide area network (WWAN) spectrum. The D2D communication linkmay use one or more sidelink channels, such as a physical sidelink broadcast channel (PSBCH), a physical sidelink discovery channel (PSDCH), a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH), and a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH). D2D communication may be through a variety of wireless D2D communications systems, such as for example, Bluetooth™ (Bluetooth is a trademark of the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG)), Wi-Fi™ (Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance) based on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 standard, LTE, or NR.

150 104 154 104 150 The wireless communications system may further include a Wi-Fi APin communication with UEs(also referred to as Wi-Fi stations (STAs)) via communication link, e.g., in a 5 GHz unlicensed frequency spectrum or the like. When communicating in an unlicensed frequency spectrum, the UEs/APmay perform a clear channel assessment (CCA) prior to communicating in order to determine whether the channel is available.

The electromagnetic spectrum is often subdivided, based on frequency/wavelength, into various classes, bands, channels, etc. In 5G NR, two initial operating bands have been identified as frequency range designations FRI (410 MHZ-7.125 GHZ) and FR2 (24.25 GHz-52.6 GHZ). Although a portion of FR1 is greater than 6 GHz, FRI is often referred to (interchangeably) as a “sub-6 GHz” band in various documents and articles. A similar nomenclature issue sometimes occurs with regard to FR2, which is often referred to (interchangeably) as a “millimeter wave” band in documents and articles, despite being different from the extremely high frequency (EHF) band (30 GHz-300 GHz) which is identified by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) as a “millimeter wave” band.

The frequencies between FR1 and FR2 are often referred to as mid-band frequencies. Recent 5G NR studies have identified an operating band for these mid-band frequencies as frequency range designation FR3 (7.125 GHZ-24.25 GHZ). Frequency bands falling within FR3 may inherit FR1 characteristics and/or FR2 characteristics, and thus may effectively extend features of FR1 and/or FR2 into mid-band frequencies. In addition, higher frequency bands are currently being explored to extend 5G NR operation beyond 52.6 GHz. For example, three higher operating bands have been identified as frequency range designations FR2-2 (52.6 GHZ-71 GHZ), FR4 (71 GHz-114.25 GHZ), and FR5 (114.25 GHZ-300 GHz). Each of these higher frequency bands falls within the EHF band.

With the above aspects in mind, unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “sub-6 GHz” or the like if used herein may broadly represent frequencies that may be less than 6 GHZ, may be within FR1, or may include mid-band frequencies. Further, unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “millimeter wave” or the like if used herein may broadly represent frequencies that may include mid-band frequencies, may be within FR2, FR4, FR2-2, and/or FR5, or may be within the EHF band.

102 104 102 182 104 104 102 104 184 102 102 104 102 104 102 104 102 104 The base stationand the UEmay each include a plurality of antennas, such as antenna elements, antenna panels, and/or antenna arrays to facilitate beamforming. The base stationmay transmit a beamformed signalto the UEin one or more transmit directions. The UEmay receive the beamformed signal from the base stationin one or more receive directions. The UEmay also transmit a beamformed signalto the base stationin one or more transmit directions. The base stationmay receive the beamformed signal from the UEin one or more receive directions. The base station/UEmay perform beam training to determine the best receive and transmit directions for each of the base station/UE. The transmit and receive directions for the base stationmay or may not be the same. The transmit and receive directions for the UEmay or may not be the same.

102 102 The base stationmay include and/or be referred to as a gNB, Node B, eNB, an access point, a base transceiver station, a radio base station, a radio transceiver, a transceiver function, a basic service set (BSS), an extended service set (ESS), a TRP, network node, network entity, network equipment, or some other suitable terminology. The base stationcan be implemented as an integrated access and backhaul (IAB) node, a relay node, a sidelink node, an aggregated (monolithic) base station with a baseband unit (BBU) (including a CU and a DU) and an RU, or as a disaggregated base station including one or more of a CU, a DU, and/or an RU. The set of base stations, which may include disaggregated base stations and/or aggregated base stations, may be referred to as next generation (NG) RAN (NG-RAN).

120 161 162 163 164 168 161 104 120 161 162 163 164 168 165 166 168 165 166 165 166 165 166 104 161 104 104 104 104 102 104 170 The core networkmay include an Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF), a Session Management Function (SMF), a User Plane Function (UPF), a Unified Data Management (UDM), one or more location servers, and other functional entities. The AMFis the control node that processes the signaling between the UEsand the core network. The AMFsupports registration management, connection management, mobility management, and other functions. The SMFsupports session management and other functions. The UPFsupports packet routing, packet forwarding, and other functions. The UDMsupports the generation of authentication and key agreement (AKA) credentials, user identification handling, access authorization, and subscription management. The one or more location serversare illustrated as including a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC)and a Location Management Function (LMF). However, generally, the one or more location serversmay include one or more location/positioning servers, which may include one or more of the GMLC, the LMF, a position determination entity (PDE), a serving mobile location center (SMLC), a mobile positioning center (MPC), or the like. The GMLCand the LMFsupport UE location services. The GMLCprovides an interface for clients/applications (e.g., emergency services) for accessing UE positioning information. The LMFreceives measurements and assistance information from the NG-RAN and the UEvia the AMFto compute the position of the UE. The NG-RAN may utilize one or more positioning methods in order to determine the position of the UE. Positioning the UEmay involve signal measurements, a position estimate, and an optional velocity computation based on the measurements. The signal measurements may be made by the UEand/or the base stationserving the UE. The signals measured may be based on one or more of a satellite positioning system (SPS)(e.g., one or more of a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), global position system (GPS), non-terrestrial network (NTN), or other satellite position/location system), LTE signals, wireless local area network (WLAN) signals, Bluetooth signals, a terrestrial beacon system (TBS), sensor-based information (e.g., barometric pressure sensor, motion sensor), NR enhanced cell ID (NR E-CID) methods, NR signals (e.g., multi-round trip time (Multi-RTT), DL angle-of-departure (DL-AoD), DL time difference of arrival (DL-TDOA), UL time difference of arrival (UL-TDOA), and UL angle-of-arrival (UL-AoA) positioning), and/or other systems/signals/sensors.

104 104 104 Examples of UEsinclude a cellular phone, a smart phone, a session initiation protocol (SIP) phone, a laptop, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a satellite radio, a global positioning system, a multimedia device, a video device, a digital audio player (e.g., MP3 player), a camera, a game console, a tablet, a smart device, a wearable device, a vehicle, an electric meter, a gas pump, a large or small kitchen appliance, a healthcare device, an implant, a sensor/actuator, a display, or any other similar functioning device. Some of the UEsmay be referred to as IoT devices (e.g., parking meter, gas pump, toaster, vehicles, heart monitor, etc.). The UEmay also be referred to as a station, a mobile station, a subscriber station, a mobile unit, a subscriber unit, a wireless unit, a remote unit, a mobile device, a wireless device, a wireless communications device, a remote device, a mobile subscriber station, an access terminal, a mobile terminal, a wireless terminal, a remote terminal, a handset, a user agent, a mobile client, a client, or some other suitable terminology. In some scenarios, the term UE may also apply to one or more companion devices such as in a device constellation arrangement. One or more of these devices may collectively access the network and/or individually access the network.

1 FIG. 104 198 102 168 199 104 Referring again to, in certain aspects, the UEmay have an SS RAIM componentthat may be configured to estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs; exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value; and perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. In certain aspects, the base stationor the one or more location serversmay have an SS RAIM configuration componentthat may be configured to provide configurations and/or parameters related to SS RAIM for the UE.

2 FIG.A 2 FIG.B 2 FIG.C 2 FIG.D 2 2 FIGS.A,C 200 230 250 280 is a diagramillustrating an example of a first subframe within a 5G NR frame structure.is a diagramillustrating an example of DL channels within a 5G NR subframe.is a diagramillustrating an example of a second subframe within a 5G NR frame structure.is a diagramillustrating an example of UL channels within a 5G NR subframe. The 5G NR frame structure may be frequency division duplexed (FDD) in which for a particular set of subcarriers (carrier system bandwidth), subframes within the set of subcarriers are dedicated for either DL or UL, or may be time division duplexed (TDD) in which for a particular set of subcarriers (carrier system bandwidth), subframes within the set of subcarriers are dedicated for both DL and UL. In the examples provided by, the 5G NR frame structure is assumed to be TDD, with subframe 4 being configured with slot format 28 (with mostly DL), where D is DL, U is UL, and F is flexible for use between DL/UL, and subframe 3 being configured with slot format 1 (with all UL). While subframes 3, 4 are shown with slot formats 1, 28, respectively, any particular subframe may be configured with any of the various available slot formats 0-61. Slot formats 0, 1 are all DL, UL, respectively. Other slot formats 2-61 include a mix of DL, UL, and flexible symbols. UEs are configured with the slot format (dynamically through DL control information (DCI), or semi-statically/statically through radio resource control (RRC) signaling) through a received slot format indicator (SFI). Note that the description infra applies also to a 5G NR frame structure that is TDD.

2 2 FIGS.A-D illustrate a frame structure, and the aspects of the present disclosure may be applicable to other wireless communication technologies, which may have a different frame structure and/or different channels. A frame (10 ms) may be divided into 10 equally sized subframes (1 ms). Each subframe may include one or more time slots. Subframes may also include mini-slots, which may include 7, 4, or 2 symbols. Each slot may include 14 or 12 symbols, depending on whether the cyclic prefix (CP) is normal or extended. For normal CP, each slot may include 14 symbols, and for extended CP, each slot may include 12 symbols. The symbols on DL may be CP orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) (CP-OFDM) symbols. The symbols on UL may be CP-OFDM symbols (for high throughput scenarios) or discrete Fourier transform (DFT) spread OFDM (DFT-s-OFDM) symbols (for power limited scenarios; limited to a single stream transmission). The number of slots within a subframe is based on the CP and the numerology. The numerology defines the subcarrier spacing (SCS) (see Table 1). The symbol length/duration may scale with 1/SCS.

TABLE 1 Numerology, SCS, and CP SCS μ μ Δf = 2· 15[kHz] Cyclic prefix 0 15 Normal 1 30 Normal 2 60 Normal, Extended 3 120 Normal 4 240 Normal 5 480 Normal 6 960 Normal

∥ μ 2 2 2 FIG.B For normal CP (14 symbols/slot), different numerologies μ 0 to 4 allow for 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 slots, respectively, per subframe. For extended CP, the numerology 2 allows for 4 slots per subframe. Accordingly, for normal CP and numerology μ, there are 14 symbols/slot and 2slots/subframe. The subcarrier spacing may be equal to 2*15 kHz, where μ is the numerology 0 to 4. As such, the numerology μ=0 has a subcarrier spacing of 15 kHz and the numerology μ=4 has a subcarrier spacing of 240 kHz. The symbol length/duration is inversely related to the subcarrier spacing. FIGS.A-D provide an example of normal CP with 14 symbols per slot and numerology μ=2 with 4 slots per subframe. The slot duration is 0.25 ms, the subcarrier spacing is 60 kHz, and the symbol duration is approximately 16.67 μs. Within a set of frames, there may be one or more different bandwidth parts (BWPs) (see) that are frequency division multiplexed. Each BWP may have a particular numerology and CP (normal or extended).

2 FIG.A A resource grid may be used to represent the frame structure. Each time slot includes a resource block (RB) (also referred to as physical RBs (PRBs)) that extends 12 consecutive subcarriers. The resource grid is divided into multiple resource elements (REs). The number of bits carried by each RE depends on the modulation scheme. As illustrated in, some of the REs carry reference (pilot) signals (RS) for the UE. The RS may include demodulation RS (DM-RS) (indicated as R for one particular configuration, but other DM-RS configurations are possible) and channel state information reference signals (CSI-RS) for channel estimation at the UE. The RS may also include beam measurement RS (BRS), beam refinement RS (BRRS), and phase tracking RS (PT-RS).

2 FIG.B 104 illustrates an example of various DL channels within a subframe of a frame. The physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) carries DCI within one or more control channel elements (CCEs) (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 CCEs), each CCE including six RE groups (REGs), each REG including 12 consecutive REs in an OFDM symbol of an RB. A PDCCH within one BWP may be referred to as a control resource set (CORESET). A UE is configured to monitor PDCCH candidates in a PDCCH search space (e.g., common search space, UE-specific search space) during PDCCH monitoring occasions on the CORESET, where the PDCCH candidates have different DCI formats and different aggregation levels. Additional BWPs may be located at greater and/or lower frequencies across the channel bandwidth. A primary synchronization signal (PSS) may be within symbol 2 of particular subframes of a frame. The PSS is used by a UEto determine subframe/symbol timing and a physical layer identity. A secondary synchronization signal (SSS) may be within symbol 4 of particular subframes of a frame. The SSS is used by a UE to determine a physical layer cell identity group number and radio frame timing. Based on the physical layer identity and the physical layer cell identity group number, the UE can determine a physical cell identifier (PCI). Based on the PCI, the UE can determine the locations of the DM-RS. The physical broadcast channel (PBCH), which carries a master information block (MIB), may be logically grouped with the PSS and SSS to form a synchronization signal (SS)/PBCH block (also referred to as SS block (SSB)). The MIB provides a number of RBs in the system bandwidth and a system frame number (SFN). The physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) carries user data, broadcast system information not transmitted through the PBCH such as system information blocks (SIBs), and paging messages.

2 FIG.C As illustrated in, some of the REs carry DM-RS (indicated as R for one particular configuration, but other DM-RS configurations are possible) for channel estimation at the base station. The UE may transmit DM-RS for the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) and DM-RS for the physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH). The PUSCH DM-RS may be transmitted in the first one or two symbols of the PUSCH. The PUCCH DM-RS may be transmitted in different configurations depending on whether short or long PUCCHs are transmitted and depending on the particular PUCCH format used. The UE may transmit sounding reference signals (SRS). The SRS may be transmitted in the last symbol of a subframe. The SRS may have a comb structure, and a UE may transmit SRS on one of the combs. The SRS may be used by a base station for channel quality estimation to enable frequency-dependent scheduling on the UL.

2 FIG.D illustrates an example of various UL channels within a subframe of a frame. The PUCCH may be located as indicated in one configuration. The PUCCH carries uplink control information (UCI), such as scheduling requests, a channel quality indicator (CQI), a precoding matrix indicator (PMI), a rank indicator (RI), and hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) acknowledgment (ACK) (HARQ-ACK) feedback (i.e., one or more HARQ ACK bits indicating one or more ACK and/or negative ACK (NACK)). The PUSCH carries data, and may additionally be used to carry a buffer status report (BSR), a power headroom report (PHR), and/or UCI.

3 FIG. 310 350 375 375 375 is a block diagram of a base stationin communication with a UEin an access network. In the DL, Internet protocol (IP) packets may be provided to a controller/processor. The controller/processorimplements layer 3 and layer 2 functionality. Layer 3 includes a radio resource control (RRC) layer, and layer 2 includes a service data adaptation protocol (SDAP) layer, a packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) layer, a radio link control (RLC) layer, and a medium access control (MAC) layer. The controller/processorprovides RRC layer functionality associated with broadcasting of system information (e.g., MIB, SIBs), RRC connection control (e.g., RRC connection paging, RRC connection establishment, RRC connection modification, and RRC connection release), inter radio access technology (RAT) mobility, and measurement configuration for UE measurement reporting; PDCP layer functionality associated with header compression/decompression, security (ciphering, deciphering, integrity protection, integrity verification), and handover support functions; RLC layer functionality associated with the transfer of upper layer packet data units (PDUs), error correction through ARQ, concatenation, segmentation, and reassembly of RLC service data units (SDUs), re-segmentation of RLC data PDUs, and reordering of RLC data PDUs; and MAC layer functionality associated with mapping between logical channels and transport channels, multiplexing of MAC SDUs onto transport blocks (TBs), demultiplexing of MAC SDUs from TBs, scheduling information reporting, error correction through HARQ, priority handling, and logical channel prioritization.

316 370 316 374 350 320 318 318 The transmit (TX) processorand the receive (RX) processorimplement layer 1 functionality associated with various signal processing functions. Layer 1, which includes a physical (PHY) layer, may include error detection on the transport channels, forward error correction (FEC) coding/decoding of the transport channels, interleaving, rate matching, mapping onto physical channels, modulation/demodulation of physical channels, and MIMO antenna processing. The TX processorhandles mapping to signal constellations based on various modulation schemes (e.g., binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK), M-phase-shift keying (M-PSK), M-quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM)). The coded and modulated symbols may then be split into parallel streams. Each stream may then be mapped to an OFDM subcarrier, multiplexed with a reference signal (e.g., pilot) in the time and/or frequency domain, and then combined together using an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) to produce a physical channel carrying a time domain OFDM symbol stream. The OFDM stream is spatially precoded to produce multiple spatial streams. Channel estimates from a channel estimatormay be used to determine the coding and modulation scheme, as well as for spatial processing. The channel estimate may be derived from a reference signal and/or channel condition feedback transmitted by the UE. Each spatial stream may then be provided to a different antennavia a separate transmitterTx. Each transmitterTx may modulate a radio frequency (RF) carrier with a respective spatial stream for transmission.

350 354 352 354 356 368 356 356 350 350 356 356 310 358 310 359 At the UE, each receiverRx receives a signal through its respective antenna. Each receiverRx recovers information modulated onto an RF carrier and provides the information to the receive (RX) processor. The TX processorand the RX processorimplement layer 1 functionality associated with various signal processing functions. The RX processormay perform spatial processing on the information to recover any spatial streams destined for the UE. If multiple spatial streams are destined for the UE, they may be combined by the RX processorinto a single OFDM symbol stream. The RX processorthen converts the OFDM symbol stream from the time-domain to the frequency domain using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The frequency domain signal includes a separate OFDM symbol stream for each subcarrier of the OFDM signal. The symbols on each subcarrier, and the reference signal, are recovered and demodulated by determining the most likely signal constellation points transmitted by the base station. These soft decisions may be based on channel estimates computed by the channel estimator. The soft decisions are then decoded and deinterleaved to recover the data and control signals that were originally transmitted by the base stationon the physical channel. The data and control signals are then provided to the controller/processor, which implements layer 3 and layer 2 functionality.

359 360 360 359 359 The controller/processorcan be associated with at least one memorythat stores program codes and data. The at least one memorymay be referred to as a computer-readable medium. In the UL, the controller/processorprovides demultiplexing between transport and logical channels, packet reassembly, deciphering, header decompression, and control signal processing to recover IP packets. The controller/processoris also responsible for error detection using an ACK and/or NACK protocol to support HARQ operations.

310 359 Similar to the functionality described in connection with the DL transmission by the base station, the controller/processorprovides RRC layer functionality associated with system information (e.g., MIB, SIBs) acquisition, RRC connections, and measurement reporting; PDCP layer functionality associated with header compression/decompression, and security (ciphering, deciphering, integrity protection, integrity verification); RLC layer functionality associated with the transfer of upper layer PDUs, error correction through ARQ, concatenation, segmentation, and reassembly of RLC SDUs, re-segmentation of RLC data PDUs, and reordering of RLC data PDUs; and MAC layer functionality associated with mapping between logical channels and transport channels, multiplexing of MAC SDUs onto TBs, demultiplexing of MAC SDUs from TBs, scheduling information reporting, error correction through HARQ, priority handling, and logical channel prioritization.

358 310 368 368 352 354 354 Channel estimates derived by a channel estimatorfrom a reference signal or feedback transmitted by the base stationmay be used by the TX processorto select the appropriate coding and modulation schemes, and to facilitate spatial processing. The spatial streams generated by the TX processormay be provided to different antennavia separate transmittersTx. Each transmitterTx may modulate an RF carrier with a respective spatial stream for transmission.

310 350 318 320 318 370 The UL transmission is processed at the base stationin a manner similar to that described in connection with the receiver function at the UE. Each receiverRx receives a signal through its respective antenna. Each receiverRx recovers information modulated onto an RF carrier and provides the information to a RX processor.

375 376 376 375 375 The controller/processorcan be associated with at least one memorythat stores program codes and data. The at least one memorymay be referred to as a computer-readable medium. In the UL, the controller/processorprovides demultiplexing between transport and logical channels, packet reassembly, deciphering, header decompression, control signal processing to recover IP packets. The controller/processoris also responsible for error detection using an ACK and/or NACK protocol to support HARQ operations.

368 356 359 198 1 FIG. At least one of the TX processor, the RX processor, and the controller/processormay be configured to perform aspects in connection with the SS RAIM componentof.

316 370 375 199 1 FIG. At least one of the TX processor, the RX processor, and the controller/processormay be configured to perform aspects in connection with the SS RAIM configuration componentof.

4 FIG. 400 404 412 410 406 412 410 404 410 412 412 410 168 404 414 402 406 404 402 406 404 404 402 406 404 404 SRS_TX PRS_RX SRS_RX PRS_TX SRS_RX PRS_TX SRS_TX PRS_RX SRS_TX PRS_RX SRS_RX PRS_TX is a diagramillustrating an example of a UE positioning based on reference signal measurements (which may also be referred to as “network-based positioning”) in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. The UEmay transmit UL SRSat time Tand receive DL positioning reference signals (PRS) (DL PRS)at time T. The TRPmay receive the UL SRSat time Tand transmit the DL PRSat time T. The UEmay receive the DL PRSbefore transmitting the UL SRS, or may transmit the UL SRSbefore receiving the DL PRS. In both cases, a positioning server (e.g., location server(s)) or the UEmay determine the RTTbased on ∥T-T|-T-T∥. Accordingly, multi-RTT positioning may make use of the UE Rx-Tx time difference measurements (i.e., |T-T|) and DL PRS reference signal received power (RSRP) (DL PRS-RSRP) of downlink signals received from multiple TRPs,and measured by the UE, and the measured TRP Rx-Tx time difference measurements (i.e., |T-T|) and UL SRS-RSRP at multiple TRPs,of uplink signals transmitted from UE. The UEmeasures the UE Rx-Tx time difference measurements (and/or DL PRS-RSRP of the received signals) using assistance data received from the positioning server, and the TRPs,measure the gNB Rx-Tx time difference measurements (and/or UL SRS-RSRP of the received signals) using assistance data received from the positioning server. The measurements may be used at the positioning server or the UEto determine the RTT, which is used to estimate the location of the UE. Other methods are possible for determining the RTT, such as for example using DL-TDOA and/or UL-TDOA measurements.

PRSs may be defined for network-based positioning (e.g., NR positioning) to enable UEs to detect and measure more neighbor transmission and reception points (TRPs), where multiple configurations are supported to enable a variety of deployments (e.g., indoor, outdoor, sub-6, mmW, etc.). To support PRS beam operation, beam sweeping may also be configured for PRS. The UL positioning reference signal may be based on sounding reference signals (SRSs) with enhancements/adjustments for positioning purposes. In some examples, UL-PRS may be referred to as “SRS for positioning,” and a new Information Element (IE) may be configured for SRS for positioning in RRC signaling.

DL PRS-RSRP may be defined as the linear average over the power contributions (in [W]) of the resource elements of the antenna port(s) that carry DL PRS reference signals configured for RSRP measurements within the considered measurement frequency bandwidth. In some examples, for FRI, the reference point for the DL PRS-RSRP may be the antenna connector of the UE. For FR2, DL PRS-RSRP may be measured based on the combined signal from antenna elements corresponding to a given receiver branch. For FRI and FR2, if receiver diversity is in use by the UE, the reported DL PRS-RSRP value may not be lower than the corresponding DL PRS-RSRP of any of the individual receiver branches. Similarly, UL SRS-RSRP may be defined as linear average of the power contributions (in [W]) of the resource elements carrying sounding reference signals (SRS). UL SRS-RSRP may be measured over the configured resource elements within the considered measurement frequency bandwidth in the configured measurement time occasions. In some examples, for FR1, the reference point for the UL SRS-RSRP may be the antenna connector of the base station (e.g., gNB). For FR2, UL SRS-RSRP may be measured based on the combined signal from antenna elements corresponding to a given receiver branch. For FR1 and FR2, if receiver diversity is in use by the base station, the reported UL SRS-RSRP value may not be lower than the corresponding UL SRS-RSRP of any of the individual receiver branches.

PRS-path RSRP (PRS-RSRPP) may be defined as the power of the linear average of the channel response at the i-th path delay of the resource elements that carry DL PRS signal configured for the measurement, where DL PRS-RSRPP for the 1st path delay is the power contribution corresponding to the first detected path in time. In some examples, PRS path Phase measurement may refer to the phase associated with an i-th path of the channel derived using a PRS resource.

402 406 404 404 404 402 406 DL-AoD positioning may make use of the measured DL PRS-RSRP of downlink signals received from multiple TRPs,at the UE. The UEmeasures the DL PRS-RSRP of the received signals using assistance data received from the positioning server, and the resulting measurements are used along with the azimuth angle of departure (A-AoD), the zenith angle of departure (Z-AoD), and other configuration information to locate the UEin relation to the neighboring TRPs,.

402 406 404 404 404 402 406 DL-TDOA positioning may make use of the DL reference signal time difference (RSTD) (and/or DL PRS-RSRP) of downlink signals received from multiple TRPs,at the UE. The UEmeasures the DL RSTD (and/or DL PRS-RSRP) of the received signals using assistance data received from the positioning server, and the resulting measurements are used along with other configuration information to locate the UEin relation to the neighboring TRPs,.

402 406 404 402 406 404 UL-TDOA positioning may make use of the UL relative time of arrival (RTOA) (and/or UL SRS-RSRP) at multiple TRPs,of uplink signals transmitted from UE. The TRPs,measure the UL-RTOA (and/or UL SRS-RSRP) of the received signals using assistance data received from the positioning server, and the resulting measurements are used along with other configuration information to estimate the location of the UE.

402 406 404 402 406 404 UL-AoA positioning may make use of the measured azimuth angle of arrival (A-AoA) and zenith angle of arrival (Z-AoA) at multiple TRPs,of uplink signals transmitted from the UE. The TRPs,measure the A-AoA and the Z-AoA of the received signals using assistance data received from the positioning server, and the resulting measurements are used along with other configuration information to estimate the location of the UE. For purposes of the present disclosure, a positioning operation in which measurements are provided by a UE to a base station/positioning entity/server to be used in the computation of the UE's position may be described as “UE-assisted,” “UE-assisted positioning,” and/or “UE-assisted position calculation,” while a positioning operation in which a UE measures and computes its own position may be described as “UE-based,” “UE-based positioning,” and/or “UE-based position calculation.”

404 Additional positioning methods may be used for estimating the location of the UE, such as for example, UE-side UL-AoD and/or DL-AoA. Note that data/measurements from various technologies may be combined in various ways to increase accuracy, to determine and/or to enhance certainty, to supplement/complement measurements, and/or to substitute/provide for missing information.

Note that the terms “positioning reference signal” and “PRS” generally refer to specific reference signals that are used for positioning in NR and LTE systems. However, as used herein, the terms “positioning reference signal” and “PRS” may also refer to any type of reference signal that can be used for positioning, such as but not limited to, PRS as defined in LTE and NR, TRS, PTRS, CRS, CSI-RS, DMRS, PSS, SSS, SSB, SRS, UL-PRS, etc. In addition, the terms “positioning reference signal” and “PRS” may refer to downlink or uplink positioning reference signals, unless otherwise indicated by the context. To further distinguish the type of PRS, a downlink positioning reference signal may be referred to as a “DL PRS,” and an uplink positioning reference signal (e.g., an SRS-for-positioning, PTRS) may be referred to as an “UL-PRS.” In addition, for signals that may be transmitted in both the uplink and downlink (e.g., DMRS, PTRS), the signals may be prepended with “UL” or “DL” to distinguish the direction. For example, “UL-DMRS” may be differentiated from “DL-DMRS.” In addition, the term “location” and “position” may be used interchangeably throughout the specification, which may refer to a particular geographical or a relative place.

A device (e.g., a UE) equipped with a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver may determine its location based on reception of signals from multiple satellites, which may be referred to as “GNSS positioning,” “GNSS-based positioning” or “satellite-based positioning,” etc. GNSS includes a network of satellites broadcasting timing and orbital information used for navigation and positioning measurements. In addition, GNSS may refer to the International Multi-Constellation Satellite System, which may include global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), Galileo, and any other constellation system. GNSS may include multiple groups of satellites (which may be referred to as GNSS satellites), known as constellations, that broadcast signals (which may be referred to as GNSS signals) to control stations and users of the GNSS. Based on the broadcast signals, the users may be able to determine their locations (e.g., via a trilateration process). For purposes of the present disclosure, a device (e.g., a UE) that is equipped with a GNSS receiver or is capable of receiving GNSS signals may be referred to as a GNSS device, and a device that is capable of transmitting GNSS signals, such as a satellite, may be referred to as a space vehicle (SV).

5 FIG. 500 506 504 502 502 506 502 502 502 506 506 502 is a diagramillustrating an example of GNSS positioning in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. A GNSS devicemay calculate its position and time based at least in part on data (e.g., GNSS signals) received from SVs, where each SVmay carry a record of its position and time and may transmit that data (e.g., the record) to the GNSS device. Each SVmay further include a clock that is synchronized with other clocks of SVs and with ground clock(s). If an SVdetects that there is a drift from the time maintained on the ground, the SVmay correct it. The GNSS devicemay also include a clock, but the clock for the GNSS devicemay be less stable and precise compared to the clocks for each SV.

502 504 506 504 502 506 506 As the speed of radio waves may be constant and independent of the satellite speed, a time delay between a time the SVtransmits a GNSS signaland a time the GNSS devicereceives the GNSS signalmay be proportional to the distance from the SVto the GNSS device. In some examples, a minimum of four SVs may be used by the GNSS deviceto compute/calculate one or more unknown quantities associated with positioning (e.g., three position coordinates and clock deviation from satellite time, etc.).

502 504 506 504 504 502 506 504 504 506 506 506 Each SVmay broadcast the GNSS signal(e.g., a carrier wave with modulation) continuously that may include a pseudorandom code (e.g., a sequence of ones and zeros) which may be known to the GNSS device, and may also include a message that includes a time of transmission and the SV position at that time. In other words, each GNSS signalmay carry two types of information: time and carrier wave (e.g., a modulated waveform with an input signal to be electromagnetically transmitted). Based on the GNSS signalsreceived from each SV, the GNSS devicemay measure the time of arrivals (ToAs) of the GNSS signalsand calculate the time of flights (ToFs) for the GNSS signals. Then, based on the ToFs, the GNSS devicemay compute its three-dimensional position and clock deviation, and the GNSS devicemay determine its position on the Earth. For example, the GNSS device's location may be converted to a latitude, a longitude, and a height relative to an ellipsoidal Earth model. These coordinates may be displayed, such as on a moving map display, or recorded or used by some other system, such as a vehicle guidance system.

While the distance between a GNSS device and an SV may be calculated based on the time it takes for a GNSS signal to reach the GNSS device, the SV's signal sequence may be delayed in relation to the GNSS device's sequence. Thus, in some examples, a delay may be applied to the GNSS device's sequence, such that the two sequences are aligned. For example, to calculate the delay, a GNSS device may align a pseudorandom binary sequence contained in the SV's signal to an internally generated pseudorandom binary sequence. As the SV's GNSS signal takes time to reach the GNSS device, the SV's sequence may be delayed in relation to the GNSS device's sequence. By increasingly delaying the GNSS device's sequence, the two sequences may eventually be aligned.

6 FIG. 600 is a diagramillustrating an example navigational frequency band for GNSS (e.g., global positioning system (GPS), globalnaya navigatsionnaya sputnikovaya sistema (GLONASS), and Galileo, which may also be referred to as Radio Navigation Satellite System (RNSS)) in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. There may be two bands in the region allocated to the Aeronautical Radio Navigation Service (ARNS) on a primary basis worldwide, where these bands may be suitable for Safety-of-Life applications as other users may not be allowed to interfere with their signals. They may correspond to an upper L-band (e.g., 1559-1610 MHZ), having the GPS L1, Galileo E1 and GLONASS G1, and to the bottom of a lower L-band (e.g., 1151-1214 MHZ) where GPS L5 and Galileo E5 are located, with E5a and L5 coexisting in the same frequencies. The remaining GPS L2, GLONASS G2 and Galileo E6 signals are in the bands 1215.6-1350 MHz. These bands may be allocated to radio-location services (e.g., ground radars) and RNSS on a primary basis, hence the signals in these bands may be more vulnerable to interference compared to the previous ones.

In some examples, a software or an application that accepts positioning related measurements from global navigation satellite system (GNSS)/global positioning system (GPS) chipsets and/or sensors to estimate position, velocity, and/or altitude of a device may be referred to as a positioning engine (PE). In addition, a positioning engine that is capable of achieving certain high level of accuracy (e.g., centimeter/decimeter level accuracy) and/or latency may be referred to as a precise positioning engine (PPE). For example, a positioning engine that is capable of performing real-time kinematic (RTK) (e.g., receiving or processing correction data associated with RTK) may be considered as a PPE. Another example of PPE is a positioning engine that is capable of performing precise point positioning (PPP). PPP is a positioning technique that removes or models GNSS system errors to provide a high level of position accuracy from a single receiver. For purposes of the present disclosure, a “solution,” such as a PE solution, a PPE solution, and/or a PPP solution, may refer to a set of outputs from a positioning engine module. For example, a PE solution may include a set of parameters associated with a Kalman Filter (KF) or a KF state, where the set of parameters may include position, velocity, timing, uncertainty, outlier information, integrity information, receiver clock, receiver clock rate, inter-satellite-type bias, and/or ambiguity terms, etc. In some examples, a solution may depend on GNSS satellite clock and orbit corrections, generated from a network of global reference station. Once the corrections are calculated, they may be delivered to the end user via satellite or over the Internet. These corrections may then be used by the receiver, which may result in decimeter-level or better positioning with no base station involved.

7 GNSS-based positioning may be subjected to various errors that may affect the accuracy of the positioning, and these errors may come from different sources and may impact the precision of the positioning data. For example, errors associated with GNSS-based positioning may include: (1) an ionospheric delay (e.g., delays caused by the ionosphere as a signal passes through), (2) a tropospheric delay (e.g., delays caused by the troposphere as a signal passes through due to humidity and atmospheric pressure variations, (3) clock errors (e.g., satellite clocks may not be perfect and their accuracy may introduce errors), (4) ephemeris errors (e.g., the ephemeris data, which provides information about the satellite's position over time, may not always be accurate), (5) multipath interference (e.g., signals may reflect off nearby surfaces, such as buildings or water, before reaching the receiver), (6) receiver noise (e.g., GNSS receivers may introduce noise or errors in the measurement process), and/or () satellite geometry (e.g., the arrangement of satellites in the sky relative to the receiver may affect the accuracy of the positioning), etc.

Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) is a technique that may be used in GNSS-based positioning for assessing the integrity of the signals received from satellites and ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the navigation solution. For example, GNSS systems, such as the GPS, may provide positioning, navigation, and timing information by triangulating signals from multiple satellites, and RAIM may be employed to detect and mitigate errors (e.g., which may include satellite errors discussed above) in these signals. In other words, the primary purpose of RAIM is to identify and exclude faulty satellite signals from the navigation solution, which may also be referred to as a GNSS outlier detection. For purposes of the present disclosure and in the context of GNSS positioning, an outlier may refer to a measurement or data point that deviates significantly from the expected or typical values. These deviations may cause errors in the position solution because outliers may be caused by various factors that affect the accuracy of GNSS signals, such as: (1) multi-path (MP) effects (e.g., when GNSS signals reflect off surfaces like buildings or the ground, they can create delays and alter the travel time of the GNSS signals, leading to incorrect positioning data), (2) atmospheric errors (e.g., variations in the ionosphere and troposphere may affect the speed of GNSS signals, introducing errors), (3) signal blockages (e.g., buildings, trees, or other obstructions may block or distort signals, leading to inaccurate measurements), (4) receiver noise (e.g., the quality of the GNSS receiver may introduce random errors or noise that may manifest as outliers), and/or (5) faulty satellites (e.g., occasionally, malfunctioning satellites may broadcast erroneous information that may result in positioning errors). As outliers may distort the overall accuracy of the computed position, to mitigate their impact, various filtering and statistical methods (like RAIM) are used to identify and exclude these outliers from the positioning solution.

There may be different types of RAIM algorithms for GNSS outlier detection. For example, one type of RAIM is residual-based (RB) RAIM (RB RAIM), which uses all available measurements to identify the possible GNSS outlier based on residual analysis (e.g., based on a global check and a local check). In a traditional RAIM, the integrity of a navigation solution is assessed by comparing the measured pseudo-range or pseudo-range rate (distance measurements) from multiple satellites with the expected values based on the known positions of those satellites. Residuals are the differences between the measured and expected values. If the residuals exceed a predefined threshold, it may indicate a potential issue with the signal integrity, and the faulty satellite measurements may be excluded from the navigation solution. An RB RAIM may take the concept of residuals a step further by considering not just the individual satellite measurements but also the relationships between them. For example, instead of just looking at the residuals independently for each satellite, an RB RAIM may consider the inter-satellite measurements, and exploit the redundant information available from multiple satellites. By analyzing the relationships between satellites, the RB RAIM may detect and mitigate certain types of faults that may not be apparent in traditional RAIM. However, under the RB RAIM, there may be an assumption that the residuals are Gaussian (e.g., are based on a Gaussian distribution). Thus, when a significant amount of measurements has outliers (e.g., due to multipath), the RB RAIM may not work accurately (e.g., when 15 out of 30 measurements have outliers).

Another type of RAIM is the solution separation (SS) RAIM (SS RAIM), which uses subsets of available measurements, and the strategy of how to use the subsets of available measurements may vary (e.g., just L5 subset, just above CNO threshold subset, etc.). An SS RAIM may enable residual analysis to be conducted within each subset, and each subset may provide a position estimate. Under the SS RAIM, each subset may specify a redundancy (e.g., the number of measurements is greater than the number of unknown estimates). Then, the SS RAIM may identify possible GNSS outliers based on comparison of position estimates of all subsets. For example, the SS RAIM may compare multiple independent position solutions generated by a GNSS receiver. These position solutions may be calculated using different combinations of available satellites and their measurements. By comparing these solutions, the GNSS receiver may detect any inconsistencies or errors in the measurements. If there is a problem with the measurements or if some of the satellite signals are unreliable, the position solutions may diverge significantly, and this divergence may be an indication that the integrity of the navigation solution might be compromised.

7 FIG. 700 702 704 706 708 is a diagramillustrating an example SS RAIM algorithm in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. The SS RAIM may rely on SS test for outlier detection of a selected “test SV list.” As an illustration, assuming there are twelve SVs (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) in a test SV list, an SS test may include generating an “all-in-view” position and multiple “subset positions” based on the SVs in this “test SV list.” For example, as shown at, an “all-in-view” position for a GNSS device (e.g., a UE, GNSS receiver, etc.) may be determined using all twelves SVs in the test SV list. Then, as shown at,, and, the SS test may generate all possible “subset positions” from all possible combinations of SVs in the test SV list.

704 1 1 706 For example, as shown at, a set of subset positions may be generated using different combinations of eleven SVs selected from the test SV list, which may include a first subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, a second subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12, a third subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12, . . . , etc. Also, in the context of GNSS positioning, “redundancy” may refer to “the number of measurements” minus “the number of unknown states to be estimated.” For example, “the number of measurements” for the subset group-described herein is eleven (11). Typically for GNSS position/clock estimation, the “the number of unknown state to be estimated” is four (4). Therefore, the “redundancy” for the subset group-may be seven (7). Similarly, as shown at, another set of subset positions may be generated using different combinations of ten SVs selected from the test SV list, which may include a first subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, a second subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11, a third subset position determined using SVs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12, . . . , etc.

702 704 706 As discussed above, each subset may specify at least a defined number of redundancy (e.g., the number of measurements may be specified to be greater than the number of unknown estimates (# of measurement > # of unknown estimate), and each subset may provide a position estimate of the GNSS device. As such, for purposes of the present disclosure and also for differentiation/illustrative purposes, a position of a GNSS device/UE that is determined using all SVs in a list of SVs may be referred to as an “all-in-view position” or “all-in-view solution” (e.g., as shown at) and a position of the GNSS device/UE that is determined using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs may be referred to as a “subset position” or a “subset solution” (e.g., as shown atand).

704 706 After the SS test generates the all-in-view position and the plurality of subset positions based on the test SV list, the SS test (or the GNSS device) may detect whether there arc outlier(s) in “test SV list” based on the comparison of the “all-in-view position” with all “subset positions.” For example, the all-in-view position may be compared with each subset position determined using different combinations of eleven SVs shown at, and also compared with each subset position determined using different combinations of ten SVs shown at, and so on. If the comparison between the all-in-view position and a subset position shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (difference >threshold), it may indicate that the SS test fails and there may be one or more outliers in the test SV list. On the other hand, if the comparisons between the all-in-view position and all subset positions do not show a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SS test is considered pass/success, and the all-in-view position may be output/determined to be a valid position.

702 704 706 If the SS test fails (e.g., the comparison between the all-in-view position and a subset position shows a difference that is greater than the defined threshold), the GNSS device may be configured to remove one SV from the test SV list to shrink the test SV list (assuming SV 1 is removed from the test SV list so that the test SV list now has just 11 SVs). Then, the GNSS device may determine a (new) all-in-view position using the (new) test SV list (e.g., determine the all-in-view position using SV 2 to SV 12), and then compare the (new) all-in-view position with all subset positions determined based on all possible combinations of subsets of SVs in the (new) test SV list, such as discussed in connection with,, and. The GNSS may be configured to perform the iteration to shrink the “test SV list” until the SS test passes (e.g., iteration of “fault mode assumptions” which will be discussed with examples below).

As it may be observed, the SS RAIM may demand higher computational power/cost compared to the RB RAIM, but SS RAIM typically provide better performance than the RB RAIM when measurements include a significant amount of outliers. As such, example applications of the SS RAIM may include improving GNSS positioning accuracy in a challenging environment (e.g., multiple outliers due to multi-path (MP)), and/or improving the integrity protection level for automotive platform and provide lower integrity risk bound, etc.

8 FIG. 9 10 FIGS.and 800 802 900 1000 is a diagramillustrating an example SS RAIM implementation in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. Aspects presented herein may be performed by a GNSS device, such as a UE, and may be illustrated in conjunction with diagramsandof.

810 802 802 As shown at, when the GNSS deviceis configured to perform SS RAIM, the GNSS devicemay initially start with a list of SVs, which may be referred to as the “original SV list.” For purposes of illustration, assuming the original SV list has twelve (12) SVs, SV 1 to SV 12.

812 802 At, the GNSS devicemay start an SS test based on evaluating the original SV list (e.g., evaluating SV 1 to SV 12), where the list of SVs that is evaluated during the SS test may be referred to as the “test SV list.” For purposes of illustration, this (first/initial) SS test may be referred to as a “fault mode 0 (FaultMode-0)” where “test SV list”=“original SV list” (e.g., both the test SV list and the original SV list include SV 1 to SV 12).

814 802 816 902 9 FIG. At, an all-in-view position generator (module) may generate an all-in-view position (of the GNSS device) based on using all SVs in the test SV list (e.g., using SV 1 to SV 12), and output an all-in-view position as shown at. This all-in-view position may be referred to as the “FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” as shown atof.

818 802 820 904 906 9 FIG. 9 FIG. At, a subset position generator (module) may generate a plurality of subset positions (of the GNSS device) based on different combinations of subsets of SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12), such as different combinations of eleven SVs, ten SVs, nine SVs, etc., and output the plurality of subset positions as shown at. The plurality of subset positions may be referred to as the “FaultMode-0 subset positions” as shown atof. As shown atof, for a subset-group-i, the possible combination count of the subset-group-i (C (n, i)) may be calculated based on:

where n is the size of “test SV list,” i is the size of the subset-group-i SV list, and! is the factorial operator. The total number/count of subset of positions may be calculated based on:

822 In some implementations, as shown at, a least square (LSQ) module (or an LSQ estimation module) may be configured to provide LSQ information to the all-in-view position generator (module) and/or the subset position generator (module), where the LSQ information may include the design, the pre-fit, the measurement uncertainties, etc. For example, LSQ may be one common approach to estimate the unknown states with positioning measurements. To run LSQ, some LSQ information may be specified, such as (1) design matrix—the linear mapping relationship between unknown estimates and the measurements, (2) pre-fit residuals-adjusted measurement for estimation based on approximate value of the unknown state, and (3) measurement uncertainty—this uncertainty information may be used to optimize the LSQ estimation results. As such, to calculate the all-in-view and subset positions, those LSQ information may be demanded.

824 802 At, the GNSS devicemay perform an “SS evaluation” by comparing the “FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” with all “FaultMode-0 subset positions,” and determine whether the comparison between the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and any of the FaultMode-0 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (e.g., “FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” vs. “FaultMode-0 subset position”>threshold).

826 802 802 As shown at, if the comparisons between the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and all FaultMode-0 subset positions do not show any of the comparisons has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) are considered to pass the SS evaluation, and the GNSS devicemay report the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position as the output. Typically, if the GNSS deviceis under an open sky environment and there is no outlier in measurements, the “SS evaluation” is likely to pass.

802 On the other hand, if the GNSS deviceis in a challenging environment (e.g., in an urban area surrounded by tall buildings) and measurements are subjected to multi-path (MP) effects, then “SS evaluation” is likely or expected to fail. In other words, one or more comparisons between the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and all FaultMode-0 subset positions are likely to show a difference that is greater than the defined threshold.

828 830 832 802 1002 802 802 812 824 10 FIG. As shown at,, and, if the SS evaluation for the test SV list fails (e.g., SS test for fault mode 0 fails), the GNSS devicemay begin an iteration to shrink the “test SV list.” For example, as shown atof, the GNSS devicemay start with “fault mode 1 (FaultMode-1),” where one SV is removed from the “original SV list” to generate a new “test SV list.” For purposes of illustration, assuming SV 2 is removed from the original SV list of SV 1 to SV 12. As such, the new test SV list now includes SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12 (a total of eleven SVs). In other words, “test SV list”!=“original SV list,” and “test SV list”=“original SV list”−“to-exclude SV list.” Then, the GNSS devicemay perform the SS test based on the new test SV list (e.g., SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12), such as repeating the process described in connection withto.

802 802 Depending on implementations, the criteria to select the “to-exclude SV list” (e.g., the SV(s) to be excluded in the next/subsequent SS test), multiple “to-exclude SV list” may exists, but the GNSS devicemay be configured to select just one. In some examples, the selection of an SV to be excluded (e.g., the selection of the “to-exclude SV list”) may be based on the SS test results (e.g., SS test fault mode 0 results). For example, the GNSS devicemay be configured to select the SV (e.g., the “to-exclude SV list”) with the smallest weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) values, which may be calculated based on:

where V is the post-fit residual, and P is the weighting matrix.

812 802 At, the GNSS devicemay start an SS test based on evaluating the new test SV list (e.g., evaluating SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12). For purposes of illustration, this SS test may be referred to as a “fault mode 1 (FaultMode-1).”

814 802 816 1002 10 FIG. At, the all-in-view position generator (module) may generate an all-in-view position (of the GNSS device) based on using all SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12), and output an all-in-view position as shown at. This all-in-view position may be referred to as the “FaultMode-1 all-in-view position” as shown atof.

818 802 820 1004 10 FIG. At, the subset position generator (module) may generate a plurality of subset positions (of the GNSS device) based on different combinations of subsets of SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12), such as different combinations of ten SVs, nine SVs, eight SVs, etc., and output the plurality of subset positions as shown at. The plurality of subset positions may be referred to as the “FaultMode-1 subset positions” as shown atof.

824 802 At, the GNSS devicemay perform an “SS evaluation” by comparing the “FaultMode-1 all-in-view position” with all “FaultMode-1 subset positions,” and determine whether the comparison between the FaultMode-1 all-in-view position and any of the FaultMode-1 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (e.g., “FaultMode-1 all-in-view position” vs. “FaultMode-1 subset position”>threshold).

826 802 828 830 832 802 802 802 Similarly, as shown at, if the comparisons between the FaultMode-1 all-in-view position and all FaultMode-1 subset positions do not show any of the comparisons has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12) are considered to pass the SS evaluation, and the GNSS devicemay report the FaultMode-1 all-in-view position as the output. On the other hand, if at least one comparison between the FaultMode-1 all-in-view position and all FaultMode-1 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SS evaluation for the test SV list fails (e.g., SS test for fault mode 1 fails). Then, at,, and, the GNSS devicemay begin another iteration to shrink the “test SV list.” For example, the GNSS devicemay start with “fault mode 2 (FaultMode-2),” where another SV is removed from the “test SV list” (e.g., the one that include SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12) to generate another new “test SV list.” For purposes of illustration, assuming SV 12 is removed from the test SV list of SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12. As such, the new test SV list now includes SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 11 (a total of ten SVs). Similarly, the selection of the SV to be excluded (e.g., the selection of the “to-exclude SV list”) may be based on the SS test results (e.g., SS test fault mode 1 results). For example, the GNSS devicemay be configured to select the SV (e.g., the “to-exclude SV list”) with the smallest WSS values.

1008 802 812 832 802 826 802 802 10 FIG. As shown atof, the GNSS devicemay iterate the process described in connection withto, and the iteration may stop until a test SV list passes the “SS test” (e.g., the GNSS deviceis able to output a valid position atbased on the test SV list). In some examples, the iteration may also stop if there is not enough redundancy to compute the “all-in-view position,” then the GNSS devicemay output the position as not available (N/A). For example, the GNSS devicemay specify at least five SVs for calculating the all-in-view position.

8 10 FIGS.to 8 FIG. 8 10 FIGS.to 828 802 While the SS RAIM mechanism discussed in connection withtheoretically sound, and designed for SV and constellation failure, this SS RAIM mechanism may not practically work well to detect MP outlier(s). For example, for this SS RAIM mechanism, there may be no or not enough quality check (such as just include position dilution of precision (PDOP) check) for the “subset positions” and the “all-in-view position.” This SS RAIM mechanism may also allow more low accuracy “subset positions” to participate the “SS evaluation,” which may increase the frequency for the SS evaluation to fail (e.g., the test SV list is easier to fail at the “SS evaluation”). In some scenarios, the “to-exclude SV list” selector module (e.g., as shown atof) may provide misleading information, if it is configured to purely based on selecting the SV to be excluded using the smallest WSS selection strategy (e.g., smallest WSS may come from low accuracy “subset positions”). As such, in some scenarios, the SS RAIM mechanism discussed in connection withmay be more likely to cause the GNSS deviceto output an N/A for the position, or this SS RAIM mechanism/solution may not be able to identify the outlier(s) correctly, and may trigger hazardously misleading information (HMI) for GNSS integrity output.

Aspects presented herein may improve the overall performance of SS RAIM (or the overall performance of a positioning engine configured to perform SS RAIM) by enabling the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” calculated by the SS RAIM to be validated (e.g., by a position validator module) to eliminate certain low accuracy “subset positions” and/or “all-in-view position” from an SS evaluation. For example, in one aspect, a position validator module may be configured to check whether there is any outlier(s) in the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” based on whether their WSS follows a chi-square (Chi2) distribution, and also use a residual MP sign check to detect the outlier(s). As such, aspects presented herein may enable early exit for some fault modes of the SS RAIM, and also improve the computation efficiency for the SS RAIM. For example, based on validating the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions,” the SS RAIM may permit just high accuracy “subset positions” to participate the SS evaluation, thereby enabling a list of SVs to have a higher chance of passing the SS evaluation. Aspects presented herein may also enable the SS RAIM to have a less chance of selecting a wrong or improper SV to be excluded in a subsequent SS test.

11 FIG. 1100 1102 is a diagramillustrating an example SS RAIM implementation with a position validator capable of validating outlier(s) in all-in-view position and subset positions in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. For differentiation purposes, the SS RAIM described herein may be referred to as the “enhanced SS RAIM.” Aspects presented herein may be performed by a GNSS device, such as a UE.

1110 1102 1102 1102 As shown at, if the GNSS device(or a PE/PPE of the GNSS device) is configured to perform SS RAIM, the GNSS devicemay initially start with a list of SVs, which may be referred to as the “original SV list.” For purposes of illustration, assuming the original SV list has twelve (12) SVs, SV 1 to SV 12.

1112 1102 At, the GNSS devicemay start an SS test based on evaluating the original SV list (e.g., evaluating SV 1 to SV 12), where the list of SVs that is evaluated during the SS test may be referred to as the “test SV list.” For purposes of illustration, this (first/initial) SS test may be referred to as a “fault mode 0 (FaultMode-0)” where “test SV list”=“original SV list” (e.g., both the test SV list and the original SV list include SV 1 to SV 12).

1114 1102 1116 902 9 FIG. At, an all-in-view position generator (module) may generate an all-in-view position (of the GNSS device) based on using all SVs in the test SV list (e.g., using SV 1 to SV 12), and output an all-in-view position as shown at. This all-in-view position may be referred to as the “FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” (e.g., as shown atof).

1118 1102 1120 904 9 FIG. At, a subset position generator (module) may generate a plurality of subset positions (of the GNSS device) based on different combinations of subsets of SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12), such as different combinations of eleven SVs, ten SVs, nine SVs, etc., and output the plurality of subset positions as shown at. The plurality of subset positions may be referred to as the “FaultMode-0 subset positions” (e.g., as shown atof).

1122 In some implementations, as shown at, an LSQ module may be configured to provide LSQ information to the all-in-view position generator (module) and/or the subset position generator (module), where the LSQ information may include the design, the pre-fit, the measurement uncertainties, etc.

1124 At, a position validator (module) may be configured to determine whether there are outlier(s) in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions based on performing at least one of (1) a chi-square (Chi2 or ×2) test for WSS of the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, or (2) a residual multi-path (MP) sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-O subset positions.

828 830 832 8 FIG. As discussed in connection with,, andof, the SS RAIM may include calculating the WSS values for subset positions based on WSS=VT PV, where V is the post-fit residual, and P is the weighting matrix.

In one aspect of the present disclosure, the position validator may be configured to perform a chi-square test for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether the distribution of WSS values follow a chi-square distribution. If there are no outlier in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, the distribution of WSS values is expected to follow the chi-square distribution.

Chi-square (Chi2) may refer to a statistical measure that may be used to assess the association between categorical variables or to compare observed data with data expected based on a specific hypothesis. It may be commonly used in tests of goodness-of-fit (e.g., determining if a sample matches a population or if the observed distribution of categorical data fits an expected distribution), tests of independence (e.g., assessing whether two categorical variables are independent of each other in a contingency table), and/or tests for homogeneity (e.g., testing if different populations have the same distribution of a categorical variable). The chi-square value may reflect how much the observed data deviate from the expected data.

A chi-square distribution may refer to a continuous probability distribution that arises in statistics when estimating the variance of a normally distributed population. It may be positively skewed, meaning that it may not be symmetric, especially for smaller degrees of freedom. As the degrees of freedom increase, the distribution approaches a normal distribution. The degrees of freedom (df) of the distribution refer to the number of values that are free to vary in the calculation. Characteristics of a chi-square distribution may include just taking positive values, the shape depends on the degrees of freedom, and typically used in hypothesis testing for categorical data. The chi-square test may help determining whether any observed deviations between the observed and expected frequencies are due to chance or indicate a statistically significant difference.

1102 As such, when there is no outlier in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, their WSS are expected to follow the chi-square distribution. On the other hand, if the WSS of a position (e.g., an all-in-view position or a subset position) is greater than a chi-square threshold (WSS >Chi2-threshold), it may indicate that the position is affected by the outlier. In that case, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position whose WSS is great than the chi-square threshold from the SS evaluation (and keep position whose WSS is smaller than the chi-square threshold in the SS evaluation).

1102 In another aspect of the present disclosure, the position validator may be configured to perform a residual MP sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether their residual is positive (+) or negative (−). If the residual value for a position is negative, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position from the SS evaluation.

1102 As discussed above, a “subset position” is calculated using a subset of SVs in the test SV list. By using this “subset position,” the SS RAIM/GNSS devicemay re-compute the residual for the original SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) (which may be referred to as the “computed residual”). In the context of GNSS positioning, a residual may refer to the difference between the observed (measured) value of a position-related parameter (e.g., a satellite pseudorange, phase measurement) and its predicted or estimated (e.g., calculated) value based on a positioning model.

1102 If this “subset position” is accurate, then its ground truth (GT) residual may reflect the GNSS measurement outlier. As discussed above, in PE/PPE, one major outlier may be caused by the MP, and the residual value for MP is (always) a positive value. Therefore, if any of the “computed residual” shows a negative value, and also the absolute value of the “computed residual” is greater than a defined threshold (“computed residual” absolute value is >threshold (e.g., 15 m)), then it may be indicative that a “subset position” is not accurate. As such, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude this subset position from the SS evaluation.

12 FIG.A 1200 1202 is a diagramA illustrating an example residual truth for SVs in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. As mentioned above, a residual may refer to the difference between “the observed” and “the calculated/estimated” values. The “residual truth” may refer to “the calculated/estimated” value that is obtained using a ground truth (GT) position. When an SV is affected by MP, the residual truth value of the SV is expected to be a positive value. For example, assuming SVs 2, 3, 4, 11, and 12 in the original SV list are affected by MP, as shown at, their residual truth are positive values, which may reflect the actual outlier due to MP.

12 FIG.B 1200 1204 1102 is a diagramB illustrating an example MP residual for SVs in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. As shown at, when a residual is computed using a low accuracy “subset position,” the MP residuals for some SVs may reflect negative values. This means this subset position fails the residual MP sign check, and the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude this subset position from the SS evaluation.

12 FIG.C 12 FIG.A 1200 1206 1200 1102 is a diagramC illustrating an example MP residual for SVs in accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure. As shown at, when a residual is computed using a high accuracy “subset position,” the MP residuals for some SVs may reflect positive values (e.g., similar to the residual truth shown by diagramA of). This means this subset position passes the residual MP sign check, and the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may include this subset position in the SS evaluation.

11 FIG. 1126 1128 Referring back to, after performing the chi-square test for WSS and/or the residual MP sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and FaultMode-0 subset positions, as shown at, the position validator may output the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position if it passes the chi-square test for WSS and the residual MP sign check (which may be referred to as the “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position”), and as shown at, the position validator may also output FaultMode-0 subset positions that pass the chi-square test for WSS and the residual MP sign check (which may be referred to as the “validated FaultMode-0 subset positions”). In other words, the “position validator” module may be configured to perform two types of checks: (1) Chi2 test for WSS and (2) residual MP sign check. If any of these two checks fail, the “position validator” may not pass. For example, if “all-in-view position” is unable to pass the “position validator,” the current setting of the SS test may exit and move to next setting of SS test with a “reduced test SV list”. If a “subset position/solution” is unable to pass the “position validator”, this “subset position/solution” may be eliminated from the current SS test (or SS evaluation).

1130 1102 At, the GNSS devicemay perform the SS evaluation” by comparing the “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” with all “validated FaultMode-0 subset positions,” and determine whether the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and any of the validated FaultMode-0 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (e.g., “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” vs. “validated FaultMode-0 subset position”>threshold).

1132 1102 As shown at, if the comparisons between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and all validated FaultMode-0 subset positions do not show any of the comparisons has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) are considered to pass the SS evaluation, and the GNSS devicemay report the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position as the output. On the other hand, if the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and a validated FaultMode-0 subset position has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) fail the SS evaluation.

1134 1136 1138 1102 828 830 832 1002 1102 1102 1112 1130 1102 8 FIG. 10 FIG. 8 FIG. As shown at,, and, if the SS evaluation for the test SV list fails (e.g., SS test for fault mode 0 fails), the GNSS devicemay begin an iteration to shrink the “test SV list,” such as described in connection with,, andof. For example, as shown atof, the GNSS devicemay start with “fault mode 1 (FaultMode-1),” where one SV is removed from the “original SV list” to generate a new “test SV list.” For purposes of illustration, assuming SV 2 is removed from the original SV list of SV 1 to SV 12. As such, the new test SV list now includes SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12 (a total of eleven SVs). In other words, “test SV list”!=“original SV list,” and “test SV list”=“original SV list”−“to-exclude SV list.” Then, the GNSS devicemay perform the SS test based on the new test SV list (e.g., SV 1 and SV 3 to SV 12), such as repeating the process described in connection withto. Depending on implementations, the GNSS devicemay be configured to loop all possible SS evaluation/test (e.g., instead of selecting the SV with the smallest WSS values as discussed in connection with).

11 FIG. 8 FIG. The enhanced SS RAIM discussed in connection withmay improve the overall performance of positioning compared to the SS RAIM discussed in connection with. For example, by using the enhanced SS RAIM in a challenging environment, a GNSS device may bring down the position error from hundreds meter to less than three (3) meters.

13 FIG. 1300 104 404 506 1102 1504 is a flowchartof a method of positioning at a user equipment (UE). The method may be performed by a UE (e.g., the UE,; the GNSS device,; the apparatus). The method may enable the UE to validate the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” calculated by the SS RAIM and eliminate certain low accuracy “subset positions” and/or “all-in-view position” from an SS evaluation based on the validation, thereby enabling early exit for some fault modes of the SS RAIM, and improving the computation efficiency for the SS RAIM.

1302 1114 1102 1116 1118 1102 1120 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, such as described in connection with. For example, at, an all-in-view position generator (module) may generate an all-in-view position (of the GNSS device) based on using all SVs in the test SV list (e.g., using SV 1 to SV 12), and output an all-in-view position as shown at. At, a subset position generator (module) may generate a plurality of subset positions (of the GNSS device) based on different combinations of subsets of SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12), such as different combinations of eleven SVs, ten SVs, nine SVs, etc., and output the plurality of subset positions as shown at. The estimation of the plurality of positions of the UE may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1308 1124 1102 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from an SS evaluation if at least one of: (1) a WSS of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value, such as described in connection with. For example, at, a position validator (module) may be configured to determine whether there are outlier(s) in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions based on performing at least one of (1) a chi-square (Chi2 or χ2) test for WSS of the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, or (2) a residual multi-path (MP) sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions. The position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position whose WSS is great than the chi-square threshold from the SS evaluation (and keep position whose WSS is smaller than the chi-square threshold in the SS evaluation). Similarly, if any of the “computed residual” shows a negative value, and also the absolute value of the “computed residual” is greater than a defined threshold (“computed residual” absolute value is >threshold (e.g., 15 m)), then it may be indicative that a “subset position” is not accurate. As such, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude this subset position from the SS evaluation. The exclusion of the set of positions may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1310 1130 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the GNSS devicemay perform the SS evaluation” by comparing the “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” with all “validated FaultMode-0 subset positions,” and determine whether the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and any of the validated FaultMode-0 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (e.g., “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” vs. “validated FaultMode-0 subset position”>threshold). The SS evaluation may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

11 FIG. 15 FIG. 1124 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 In one example, the UE may calculate the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions, and compare the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the position validator may be configured to perform a chi-square test for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether the distribution of WSS values follow a chi-square distribution. If there are no outlier in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, the distribution of WSS values is expected to follow the chi-square distribution. The calculation of the WSS may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

11 FIG. 15 FIG. 1124 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 In another example, the UE may compute a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions, and determine whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the position validator may be configured to perform a residual MP sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether their residual is positive (+) or negative (−). If the residual value for a position is negative, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position from the SS evaluation. The computation of the residual value may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

11 FIG. 15 FIG. 1132 1102 1134 1136 1138 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 In another example, the UE may output, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test, such as described in connection with. For example, at, if the comparisons between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and all validated FaultMode-0 subset positions do not show any of the comparisons has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) are considered to pass the SS evaluation, and the GNSS devicemay report the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position as the output. On the other hand, if the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and a validated FaultMode-0 subset position has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) fail the SS evaluation. As shown at,, and, if the SS evaluation for the test SV list fails (e.g., SS test for fault mode 0 fails), the GNSS devicemay begin an iteration to shrink the “test SV list.” The output of the indication may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin. In some implementations, to output the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, the UE may be configured to transmit the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, or store the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test.

In another example, to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the UE may be configured to estimate a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs.

In another example, the SS evaluation is associated with SS RAIM.

In another example, to perform the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions, the UE may be configured to compare a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions, and enable the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enable the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. In some implementations, the first validated position corresponds to a first position of the UE estimated using all SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the first position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the first position is a positive value. In some implementations, a second validated position in the plurality of second validated positions corresponds to a second position of the UE estimated using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the second position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the second position is a positive value.

In another example, to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the UE may be configured to measure signals from all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements.

In another example, the UE may determine that the WSS for each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold, and to exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation, the UE may be configured to exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation based on the determination that each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold.

14 FIG. 1400 104 404 506 1102 1504 is a flowchartof a method of positioning at a user equipment (UE). The method may be performed by a UE (e.g., the UE,; the GNSS device,; the apparatus). The method may enable the UE to validate the “all-in-view position” and the “subsets positions” calculated by the SS RAIM and eliminate certain low accuracy “subset positions” and/or “all-in-view position” from an SS evaluation based on the validation, thereby enabling early exit for some fault modes of the SS RAIM, and improving the computation efficiency for the SS RAIM.

1402 1114 1102 1116 1118 1102 1120 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, such as described in connection with. For example, at, an all-in-view position generator (module) may generate an all-in-view position (of the GNSS device) based on using all SVs in the test SV list (e.g., using SV 1 to SV 12), and output an all-in-view position as shown at. At, a subset position generator (module) may generate a plurality of subset positions (of the GNSS device) based on different combinations of subsets of SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12), such as different combinations of eleven SVs, ten SVs, nine SVs, etc., and output the plurality of subset positions as shown at. The estimation of the plurality of positions of the UE may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1408 1124 1102 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from an SS evaluation if at least one of: (1) a WSS of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value, such as described in connection with. For example, at, a position validator (module) may be configured to determine whether there are outlier(s) in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions based on performing at least one of (1) a chi-square (Chi2 or χ2) test for WSS of the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, or (2) a residual multi-path (MP) sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions. The position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position whose WSS is great than the chi-square threshold from the SS evaluation (and keep position whose WSS is smaller than the chi-square threshold in the SS evaluation). Similarly, if any of the “computed residual” shows a negative value, and also the absolute value of the “computed residual” is greater than a defined threshold (“computed residual” absolute value is >threshold (e.g., 15 m)), then it may be indicative that a “subset position” is not accurate. As such, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude this subset position from the SS evaluation. The exclusion of the set of positions may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1410 1130 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. At, the UE may perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the GNSS devicemay perform the SS evaluation” by comparing the “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” with all “validated FaultMode-0 subset positions,” and determine whether the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and any of the validated FaultMode-0 subset positions shows a difference that is greater than a defined threshold (e.g., “validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position” vs. “validated FaultMode-0 subset position”>threshold). The SS evaluation may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1404 1124 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. In one example, as shown at, the UE may calculate the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions, and compare the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the position validator may be configured to perform a chi-square test for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether the distribution of WSS values follow a chi-square distribution. If there are no outlier in the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions, the distribution of WSS values is expected to follow the chi-square distribution. The calculation of the WSS may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1406 1124 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. In another example, as shown at, the UE may compute a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions, and determine whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value, such as described in connection with. For example, at, the position validator may be configured to perform a residual MP sign check for the FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and the FaultMode-0 subset positions by checking whether their residual is positive (+) or negative (−). If the residual value for a position is negative, the position validator (or the SS RAIM/GNSS device) may exclude the position from the SS evaluation. The computation of the residual value may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin.

1412 1132 1102 1134 1136 1138 1102 198 1516 1522 1524 1506 1504 11 FIG. 15 FIG. In another example, as shown at, the UE may output, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test, such as described in connection with. For example, at, if the comparisons between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and all validated FaultMode-0 subset positions do not show any of the comparisons has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) are considered to pass the SS evaluation, and the GNSS devicemay report the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position as the output. On the other hand, if the comparison between the validated FaultMode-0 all-in-view position and a validated FaultMode-0 subset position has a difference that is greater than the defined threshold, the SVs in the test SV list (e.g., SV 1 to SV 12) fail the SS evaluation. As shown at,, and, if the SS evaluation for the test SV list fails (e.g., SS test for fault mode 0 fails), the GNSS devicemay begin an iteration to shrink the “test SV list.” The output of the indication may be performed by, e.g., the SS RAIM component, the SPS module, the transceiver(s), the cellular baseband processor(s), and/or the application processor(s)of the apparatusin. In some implementations, to output the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, the UE may be configured to transmit the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, or store the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test.

In another example, to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the UE may be configured to estimate a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs.

In another example, the SS evaluation is associated with SS RAIM.

In another example, to perform the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions, the UE may be configured to compare a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions, and enable the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enable the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. In some implementations, the first validated position corresponds to a first position of the UE estimated using all SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the first position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the first position is a positive value. In some implementations, a second validated position in the plurality of second validated positions corresponds to a second position of the UE estimated using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the second position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the second position is a positive value.

In another example, to estimate the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs, the UE may be configured to measure signals from all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements.

In another example, the UE may determine that the WSS for each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold, and to exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation, the UE may be configured to exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation based on the determination that each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold.

15 FIG. 3 FIG. 1500 1504 1504 1504 1524 1522 1524 1524 1504 1520 1506 1508 1510 1506 1506 1504 1512 1514 1538 1516 1518 1526 1530 1532 1534 1512 1538 1514 1516 1512 1514 1516 1580 1524 1522 1580 104 1502 1524 1506 1524 1506 1526 1524 1506 1526 1524 1506 1524 1506 1524 1506 1524 1506 1524 1506 1524 1506 1524 1506 350 360 368 356 359 1504 1524 1506 1504 350 1504 is a diagramillustrating an example of a hardware implementation for an apparatus. The apparatusmay be a UE, a component of a UE, or may implement UE functionality. In some aspects, the apparatusmay include at least one cellular baseband processor(also referred to as a modem) coupled to one or more transceivers(e.g., cellular RF transceiver). The cellular baseband processor(s)may include at least one on-chip memory′. In some aspects, the apparatusmay further include one or more subscriber identity modules (SIM) cardsand at least one application processorcoupled to a secure digital (SD) cardand a screen. The application processor(s)may include on-chip memory′. In some aspects, the apparatusmay further include a Bluetooth module, a WLAN module, an ultrawide band (UWB) module, an SPS module(e.g., GNSS module), one or more sensors(e.g., barometric pressure sensor/altimeter; motion sensor such as inertial measurement unit (IMU), gyroscope, and/or accelerometer(s); light detection and ranging (LIDAR), radio assisted detection and ranging (RADAR), sound navigation and ranging (SONAR), magnetometer, audio and/or other technologies used for positioning), additional memory modules, a power supply, a camera, and/or an electronic control unit (ECU). The Bluetooth module, the UWB module, the WLAN module, and the SPS modulemay include an on-chip transceiver (TRX) (or in some cases, just a receiver (RX)). The Bluetooth module, the WLAN module, and the SPS modulemay include their own dedicated antennas and/or utilize the antennasfor communication. The cellular baseband processor(s)communicates through the transceiver(s)via one or more antennaswith the UEand/or with an RU associated with a network entity. The cellular baseband processor(s)and the application processor(s)may each include a computer-readable medium/memory′,′, respectively. The additional memory modulesmay also be considered a computer-readable medium/memory. Each computer-readable medium/memory′,′,may be non-transitory. The cellular baseband processor(s)and the application processor(s)are each responsible for general processing, including the execution of software stored on the computer-readable medium/memory. The software, when executed by the cellular baseband processor(s)/application processor(s), causes the cellular baseband processor(s)/application processor(s)to perform the various functions described supra. The cellular baseband processor(s)and the application processor(s)are configured to perform the various functions described supra based at least in part of the information stored in the memory. That is, the cellular baseband processor(s)and the application processor(s)may be configured to perform a first subset of the various functions described supra without information stored in the memory and may be configured to perform a second subset of the various functions described supra based on the information stored in the memory. The computer-readable medium/memory may also be used for storing data that is manipulated by the cellular baseband processor(s)/application processor(s)when executing software. The cellular baseband processor(s)/application processor(s)may be a component of the UEand may include the at least one memoryand/or at least one of the TX processor, the RX processor, and the controller/processor. In one configuration, the apparatusmay be at least one processor chip (modem and/or application) and include just the cellular baseband processor(s)and/or the application processor(s), and in another configuration, the apparatusmay be the entire UE (e.g., see UEof) and include the additional modules of the apparatus.

198 198 198 198 1524 1506 1524 1506 198 1504 1504 1524 1506 1504 1504 As discussed supra, the SS RAIM componentmay be configured to estimate a plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. The SS RAIM componentmay also be configured to exclude a set of positions in the plurality of positions from an SS evaluation if at least one of: (1) a WSS of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value. The SS RAIM componentmay also be configured to perform, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. The SS RAIM componentmay be within the cellular baseband processor(s), the application processor(s), or both the cellular baseband processor(s)and the application processor(s). The SS RAIM componentmay be one or more hardware components specifically configured to carry out the stated processes/algorithm, implemented by one or more processors configured to perform the stated processes/algorithm, stored within a computer-readable medium for implementation by one or more processors, or some combination thereof. When multiple processors are implemented, the multiple processors may perform the stated processes/algorithm individually or in combination. As shown, the apparatusmay include a variety of components configured for various functions. In one configuration, the apparatus, and in particular the cellular baseband processor(s)and/or the application processor(s), may include means for estimating a plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. The apparatusmay further include means for excluding a set of positions in the plurality of positions from an SS evaluation if at least one of: (1) a WSS of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value. The apparatusmay further include means for performing, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions.

1504 In one configuration, the apparatusmay further include means for calculating the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions, and means for comparing the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold.

1504 In another configuration, the apparatusmay further include means for computing a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions, and means for determining whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value.

1504 1504 In another configuration, the apparatusmay further include means for outputting, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test. In some implementations, the means for outputting the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test may include configuring the apparatusto transmit the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test, or store the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test.

1504 In another configuration, the means for estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs may include configuring the apparatusto estimate a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs.

In another configuration, the SS evaluation is associated with SS RAIM.

1504 In another configuration, the means for performing the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions may include configuring the apparatusto compare a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions, and enable the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enable the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. In some implementations, the first validated position corresponds to a first position of the UE estimated using all SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the first position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the first position is a positive value. In some implementations, a second validated position in the plurality of second validated positions corresponds to a second position of the UE estimated using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs, where the WSS of the second position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the second position is a positive value.

1504 In another configuration, the means for estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs may include configuring the apparatusto measure signals from all SVs in the list of SVs, and estimate the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements.

1504 1504 In another configuration, the apparatusmay further include means for determining that the WSS for each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold, and the means for excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation may include configuring the apparatusto exclude the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation based on the determination that each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold.

198 1504 1504 368 356 359 368 356 359 The means may be the SS RAIM componentof the apparatusconfigured to perform the functions recited by the means. As described supra, the apparatusmay include the TX processor, the RX processor, and the controller/processor. As such, in one configuration, the means may be the TX processor, the RX processor, and/or the controller/processorconfigured to perform the functions recited by the means.

It is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of blocks in the processes/flowcharts disclosed is an illustration of example approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of blocks in the processes/flowcharts may be rearranged. Further, some blocks may be combined or omitted. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various blocks in a sample order, and are not limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.

The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various aspects described herein. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other aspects. Thus, the claims are not limited to the aspects described herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the language claims. Reference to an element in the singular does not mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” Terms such as “if,” “when,” and “while” do not imply an immediate temporal relationship or reaction. That is, these phrases, e.g., “when,” do not imply an immediate action in response to or during the occurrence of an action, but simply imply that if a condition is met then an action will occur, but without requiring a specific or immediate time constraint for the action to occur. The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any aspect described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the term “some” refers to one or more. Combinations such as “at least one of A, B, or C,” “one or more of A, B, or C,” “at least one of A, B, and C,” “one or more of A, B, and C,” and “A, B, C, or any combination thereof” include any combination of A, B, and/or C, and may include multiples of A, multiples of B, or multiples of C. Specifically, combinations such as “at least one of A, B, or C,” “one or more of A, B, or C,” “at least one of A, B, and C,” “one or more of A, B, and C,” and “A, B, C, or any combination thereof” may be A only, B only, C only, A and B, A and C, B and C, or A and B and C, where any such combinations may contain one or more member or members of A, B, or C. Sets should be interpreted as a set of elements where the elements number one or more. Accordingly, for a set of X, X would include one or more elements. When at least one processor is configured to perform a set of functions, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to perform the set of functions. Accordingly, each processor of the at least one processor may be configured to perform a particular subset of the set of functions, where the subset is the full set, a proper subset of the set, or an empty subset of the set. A processor may be referred to as processor circuitry. A memory/memory module may be referred to as memory circuitry. If a first apparatus receives data from or transmits data to a second apparatus, the data may be received/transmitted directly between the first and second apparatuses, or indirectly between the first and second apparatuses through a set of apparatuses. A device configured to “output” data or “provide” data, such as a transmission, signal, or message, may transmit the data, for example with a transceiver, or may send the data to a device that transmits the data. A device configured to “obtain” data, such as a transmission, signal, or message, may receive, for example with a transceiver, or may obtain the data from a device that receives the data. Information stored in a memory includes instructions and/or data. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various aspects described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. The words “module,” “mechanism,” “element,” “device,” and the like may not be a substitute for the word “means.” As such, no claim element is to be construed as a means plus function unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.”

As used herein, the phrase “based on” shall not be construed as a reference to a closed set of information, one or more conditions, one or more factors, or the like. In other words, the phrase “based on A” (where “A” may be information, a condition, a factor, or the like) shall be construed as “based at least on A” unless specifically recited differently.

Aspect 1 is a method of positioning at a user equipment (UE), comprising: estimating a plurality of positions of the UE using all space vehicles (SVs) in a list of SVs and a plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs; excluding a set of positions in the plurality of positions from a solution separation (SS) evaluation if at least one of: (1) a weighted sum of squared residual (WSS) of the set of positions is greater than a chi-square threshold or (2) a computed residual of the set of positions indicates a negative value; and performing, after excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions, the SS evaluation based on rest of the plurality of positions. Aspect 2 is the method of aspect 1, wherein estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs comprises: estimating a first position of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimating a set of second positions of the UE using the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs. Aspect 3 is the method of aspect 1 or aspect 2, further comprising: calculating the WSS for each position in the plurality of positions; and comparing the calculated WSS for each position in the plurality of positions with the chi-square threshold. Aspect 4 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 3, further comprising: computing a residual value for each position in the plurality of positions; and determining whether the computed residual value for each position in the plurality of positions is the negative value. Aspect 5 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 4, wherein the SS evaluation is associated with SS-receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) (SS RAIM). Aspect 6 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 5, wherein performing the SS evaluation based on the rest of the plurality of positions comprises: comparing a first validated position in the rest of the plurality of positions with each of a plurality of second validated positions in the rest of the plurality of positions; and enabling the SS evaluation to pass if a difference between each comparison does not exceed a difference threshold, or enabling the SS evaluation to fail if the difference for at least one comparison exceeds the difference threshold. Aspect 7 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 6, wherein the first validated position corresponds to a first position of the UE estimated using all SVs in the list of SVs, wherein the WSS of the first position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the first position is a positive value. Aspect 8 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 7, wherein a second validated position in the plurality of second validated positions corresponds to a second position of the UE estimated using a subset of SVs in the list of SVs, wherein the WSS of the second position is less than the chi-square threshold and the computed residual for the second position is a positive value. Aspect 9 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 8, wherein estimating the plurality of positions of the UE using all SVs in the list of SVs and the plurality of subsets of SVs in the list of SVs comprises: measuring signals from all SVs in the list of SVs; and estimating the plurality of positions of the UE based on the measurements. Aspect 10 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 9, further comprising: determining that the WSS for each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold; wherein excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation comprises: excluding the set of positions in the plurality of positions from the SS evaluation based on the determination that each position in the set of positions is greater than the chi-square threshold. Aspect 11 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 10, further comprising: outputting, based on the SS evaluation, an indication of: (1) using a position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for a subsequent SS test. Aspect 12 is the method of any of aspects 1 to 11, wherein outputting the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test comprises: transmitting the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test; or storing the indication of: (1) using the position estimated from all SVs in the list of SVs, or (2) removing an SV from the list of SVs for the subsequent SS test. Aspect 13 is an apparatus for positioning at a user equipment (UE), including: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled to the at least one memory and, based at least in part on stored information that is stored in the at least one memory, the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is configured to implement any of aspects 1 to 12. Aspect 14 is the apparatus of aspect 13, further including at least one transceiver coupled to the at least one processor. Aspect 15 is an apparatus for positioning at a user equipment (UE) including means for implementing any of aspects 1 to 12. Aspect 16 is a computer-readable medium (e.g., a non-transitory computer-readable medium) storing computer executable code, where the code when executed by a processor causes the processor to implement any of aspects 1 to 12. The following aspects are illustrative only and may be combined with other aspects or teachings described herein, without limitation.

Classification Codes (CPC)

Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

November 19, 2024

Publication Date

May 21, 2026

Inventors

Min WANG
Kevin SHI

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “ENHANCED SOLUTION SEPARATION RECEIVER AUTONOMOUS INTEGRITY MONITORING FOR POSITIONING ENGINE” (US-20260143447-A1). https://patentable.app/patents/US-20260143447-A1

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.

ENHANCED SOLUTION SEPARATION RECEIVER AUTONOMOUS INTEGRITY MONITORING FOR POSITIONING ENGINE — Min WANG | Patentable