Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method for determining thresholds for a plurality of slide review processes for use with an automated screening device comprising the steps of: a) computing a review process cost associated with each slide review process of the plurality of slide review processes; b) computing a sensitivity to abnormals associated with each slide review process; and c) computing an overall review rate from a review rate for each slide review process, wherein each review rate is affected by a threshold for the slide review process, wherein each threshold is selected to provide a review rate for each slide review process that minimizes a total cost and satisifies a minimum sensitivity constraint.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the review process cost comprises a false negative cost.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the review process cost comprises operational cost.
4. A method for determining a slide review process for screening and reviewing of a cytological specimen on a slide using an automated screening device, the method comprising the steps of processing the cytological specimen with the automated screening device to generate a slide score; classifying the slide score according to predetermined criteria to provide a slide score classification; and determining a slide review process from a plurality of slide review processes to perform on the cytological specimen based on the slide score classification; wherein the step of processing the cytological specimen with the automated screening device further comprises the step of generating a plurality of fields of view; wherein the step of processing the cytological specimen further comprises generating a plurality of field of view scores; wherein the step of processing the cytological specimen further comprises the steps of scoring a plurality of fields of view of the slide to provide a field of view score for each field of view of the plurality of fields of view; ranking the plurality of fields of view according to its field of view score; determining a number of fields of view to select for review; and selecting the highest ranked fields of view within that number for review; and wherein the step of determining a number of fields of view to select for review further comprises the steps of: a) computing a k highest field of view score to satisfy the following conditions: EQU (1-F.sub.1)(1-F.sub.2) . . . (1-F.sub.k)<.alpha.(1-S) and EQU (1-F.sub.1)(1-F.sub.2) . . . (1-F.sub.k-1)>.alpha.(1-S) where: .alpha. is an adjusting factor; F.sub.k is the field of view score of a kth highest field of view; and S is the slide score; and b) selecting a plurality of fields of view having the k highest field of view scores for review.
5. A method for determining a slide review process for screening and reviewing of a cytological specimen on a slide using an automated screening device, the method comprising the steps of: processing the cytological specimen with the automated screening device to generate a slide score; classifying the slide score according to predetermined criteria to provide a slide score classification; and determining a slide review process from a plurality of slide review processes to perform on the cytological specimen based on the slide score classification; wherein the step of processing the cytological specimen with the automated screening device further comprises the step of generating a plurality of fields of view; wherein the step of processing the cytological specimen further comprises generating a plurality of field of view scores; wherein step of processing the cytological specimen further comprises the steps of: scoring a plurality of fields of view of the slide to provide a field of view score for each field of view of the plurality of fields of view; ranking the plurality of fields of view according to its field of view score; determining a number of fields of view to select for review; and selecting the highest ranked fields of view within that number for review; wherein the step of determining a number of fields of view to select for review further comprises the steps of: a) determining if the slide score exceeds a predetermined threshold, and if it does not, selecting no fields of view for review; and b) if it does, computing a k highest field of view score to satisfy the following conditions: EQU (1-F.sub.1)(1-F.sub.2) . . . (1-F.sub.k)<.alpha.(1-S) and EQU (1-F.sub.1)(1-F.sub.2) . . . (1-F.sub.k-1)>.alpha.(1-S) where: .alpha. is an adjusting factor; F.sub.k is the field of view score of a kth highest field of view; and S is the slide score; and c) selecting a plurality of fields of view having the k highest field of view scores for review.
6. A method for determining a slide review process for screening and reviewing of a cytological specimen on a slide using an automated screening device, the method comprising the steps of: a) processing the cytological specimen with the automated screening device to generate a slide score; b) classifying the slide score according to predetermined criteria to provide a slide score classification; c) determining a slide review process from a plurality of slide review processes to perform on the cytological specimen based on the slide score classification; d) computing a review process cost associated with each slide review process of the plurality of slide review processes; e) computing a sensitivity to abnormals associated with each slide review process; and f) computing a review rate for each slide review process, wherein the review rate for each slide review process is selected to minimize a total cost and satisfy a minimum sensitivity constraint.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the review process cost comprises a false negative cost.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the review process cost comprises operational cost.
Complete technical specification and implementation details from the patent document.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
Unknown
January 30, 2001
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.