A method for measuring network performance parity includes the steps of computing a call completion ratio for at least one network provider, and determining whether the call completion ratio passes a first test. These steps may further include computing a first call completion ratio for a first network provider, a second call completion ratio for a second network provider, a difference between the first call completion ratio and the second call completion ratio, and a variance for the difference. The method also includes the step of assessing whether a second test is determinate if the call completion ratio does not pass the first test, by determining whether the variance is greater than a variance cutoff. In addition, the method includes the step of assessing whether a call completion ratio passes the second test, if the second test is determinate, by determining whether the difference is greater than a threshold.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method for measuring network performance parity comprising the steps of: computing a call completion ratio for at least one network provider; determining whether the call completion ratio passes a first test; assessing whether a second test is determinate if the call completion ratio does not pass the first test; and assessing whether the call completion ratio passes the second test if the second test is determinate.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if the call completion ratio passes one of the first test and the second test.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of declaring an indeterminate outcome if the second test is not determinate.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of declaring a fail if the call completion ratio does not pass the second test.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: declaring a pass if the call completion ratio passes one of the first test and the second test; declaring an indeterminate outcome if the second test is not determinate; and declaring a fail if the call completion ratio does not pass the second test.
6. A method for measuring network performance parity comprising the steps of: computing a first call completion ratio for a first network provider, and a second call completion ratio for a second network provider; computing a difference between the first call completion ratio and the second call completion ratio; computing a variance for the difference between the first call completion ratio and the second call completion ratio; determining whether one of the first call completion ratio and the difference passes an initial test; determining whether the variance is greater than a variance cutoff if the initial test is not passed; and determining whether the difference is greater than a threshold if the variance is not greater than the variance cutoff.
7. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if one of the first call completion ratio and the difference passes the initial test.
8. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of declaring an indeterminate outcome if the variance is greater than the cutoff variance.
9. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if the difference is not greater than the threshold.
10. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of declaring a fail if the difference is greater than the threshold.
11. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of: declaring a pass if one of the first call completion ratio and the difference passes the initial test; declaring an indeterminate outcome if the variance is greater than the cutoff variance; declaring a pass if the difference is not greater than the threshold; and declaring a fail if the difference is greater than the threshold.
12. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of determining whether the first call completion ratio is less than a third call completion ratio, as part of the initial test.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the third call completion ratio is one of 0.97 and 97%.
14. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if the first call completion ratio is not less than the third call completion ratio.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the third call completion ratio is one of 0.97 and 97%.
16. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of computing the difference by subtracting the first call completion ratio from the second call completion ratio, and determining whether the difference is greater than zero, as part of the initial test.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if the difference is not greater than zero.
18. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of: determining whether the first call completion ratio is less than a third call completion ratio, as part of the initial test; computing the difference by subtracting the first call completion ratio from the second call completion ratio; and determining whether the difference is greater than zero, as part of the initial test.
19. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of declaring a pass if one of the first call completion ratio is not less than the third call completion ratio, and the difference is not greater than zero.
20. The method of claim 18 further comprising the steps of: declaring a pass if one of the first call completion ratio is not less than the third call completion ratio, and the difference is not greater than zero; declaring an indeterminate outcome if the variance is greater than the cutoff variance; declaring a pass if the difference is not greater than the threshold; and declaring a fail if the difference is greater than the threshold.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
May 21, 1999
February 25, 2003
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.