A system and method for performing independent third party verification utilizes an automated system for posing questions to a customer and for recording and analyzing the customer's responses to those questions. The system could include a voice synthesizer or an audio player for posing oral questions to a customer. The system could also include voice recognition capabilities to analyze a customer's oral responses to questions. The system could also be provided with the capability to analyze a series of customer responses and to create an automated score to confirm or deny the verification process. The system could further include a live operator interface to allow a live operator to quickly review only the customer's responses to a series of verification questions. The live operator's analysis of the customer responses could be compared to the automated analysis as a further check on the verification process. Preferred embodiments would also include the means to access customer responses based on customer-specific information.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A system for performing independent verification, comprising: a processor; a question generating unit, connected to the processor, and configured to pose questions to a customer via a communications medium; a recording unit configured to record customer responses to questions; a response analysis unit, connected to the processor, and configured to analyze customer responses to questions in an automated fashion and to generate an automated score for a series of customer responses; an operator interface that is configured to allow an operator to review a series of recorded customer responses, and to input an operator score for the series of customer responses; and a comparing unit that is configured to compare an operator score for a series of customer responses to an automated score for the series of customer responses.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the comparing unit confirms an independent verification if an operator score for a series of customer responses matches the automated score for the series of customer responses.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the comparing unit flags a series of customer responses for further analysis is an operator score for the series of customer responses does not match an automated score for the series of customer responses.
4. The system of claim 3 , wherein if the comparing unit flags a series of customer responses for further analysis, the response analysis unit is configured to re-analyze the series of customer responses and to generate a new automated score, and wherein the comparing unit is configured to compare the new automated score to the operator score.
5. A system for performing independent verification, comprising: a processor; a question generating unit, connected to the processor, and configured to pose questions to a customer through a communications medium; a response analysis unit, connected to the processor, configured to analyze customer responses to questions by performing speech recognition on spoken customer responses wherein the response analysis unit is configured to automatically generate an automated score for a series of customer responses; a recording unit configured to record customer responses to questions, wherein the system is configured to simultaneously record a customer's spoken response and perform speech recognition on the spoken response to interpret the spoken response; an operator interface configured to allow an operator to review recorded customer responses wherein the operator interface allows an operator to input an operator score for a series of recorded customer responses; and a comparing unit for comparing an operator score of a series of customer responses to an automated score for the series of customer responses that was generated by the response analysis unit.
6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the comparing unit confirms an independent verification if an operator score for a series of customer responses matches an automated score for the series of customer responses.
7. The system of claim 5 , wherein the comparing unit flags a series of customer responses for further analysis if an operator score for the series of customer responses does not match an automated score for the series of customer responses.
8. The system of claim 7 , wherein if the comparing unit flags a series of customer responses for further analysis, the response analysis unit re-analyzes the series of customer responses and generates a new automated score, and wherein the comparing unit is configured to compare the new automated score to an operator score for the series of customer responses.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
October 23, 1998
November 18, 2003
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.