A system and method for designing an automotive body structure. A CAE system 14 receives certain programmable parameters or user input data 12, and generates a computer model of a body structure 16 which is analyzed and optimized in order to minimize the weight of the body structure 16 by use of adhesive bond technology.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A system for creating a model of a body structure of the type which is formed by a plurality of members which are selectively interconnected by a plurality of first and second joints, said system comprising: an input component selected from the group consisting of a user interface and input device, the input component selectively receiving first data which describes attributes of said plurality of members and second data which describes attributes of said plurality of first and second joints; a CAE system which: generates said model of said body structure based on said first and second data, receives third data corresponding to operating loads, simulates said operating loads being imparted upon said body structure by use of said model; and records certain performance characteristics of said body structure which are measured when said model of body structure is exposed to said simulated operating loads.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of members comprise vehicle body panels.
3. The system of claim 2 wherein said first joints comprise adhesive joints.
4. The system of claim 3 wherein said second joints comprise welded joints.
5. The system of claim 4 wherein said attributes of said plurality of members include a gage, shape and size of each of said plurality of members.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein said attributes of said plurality of first and second joints include a location and type of each of said plurality of first and second joints.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein each of said plurality of first and second joints is modeled as a spring.
8. A method for designing a body structure having a plurality of seams, said method comprising the steps of: generating a first computer model of said body structure in which each of said plurality of seams is adhesively bonded; performing a simulated test of said first computer model of said body structure; analyzing results of said simulated test; ranking each of said adhesively bonded seams based upon a contribution to body stiffness; selecting a combination of adhesively bonded seams based upon said ranking; generating a second computer model of said body structure having said combination of adhesively bonded seams; and analyzing said second computer model to determine whether said second computer model of said body structure satisfies certain cost and performance requirements.
9. The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of: determining whether said second computer model of said body structure is feasible to manufacture.
10. The method of claim 9 further comprising the steps of: if said second computer model of said body structure is not feasible to manufacture, selecting a second combination of adhesively bonded seams based upon said ranking; generating a third computer model of said body structure having said second combination of adhesively bonded seams; and analyzing said third computer model to determine whether said third computer model satisfies certain cost and performance requirements.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein said body structure comprises a vehicle body structure.
12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the steps of: if said second computer model of said body structure is feasible to manufacture, performing a full vehicle computer analysis of said second computer model; and optimizing said second computer model of said body structure based upon said complete functional computer analysis, said optimized body structure having a reduced weight.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said body structure further comprises a plurality of members which are interconnected by said plurality of seams and which each has a unique gage, and wherein the step of optimizing said body structure comprises reducing the gage of at least one of said plurality of members.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the steps of generating said first and second computer model and performing said full vehicle analysis are performed by use of a computer aided engineering system.
15. A method for designing an automotive body structure having a plurality of members which are interconnected by a plurality of seams, said method comprising the steps of: receiving data describing attributes of said plurality of members and said plurality of seams; generating a first computer model of said body structure based upon said received data, said first computer model having adhesive bonds at each of said plurality of seams; performing a simulation of said first computer model of said body structure; ranking each of said adhesively bonded seams based upon a contribution to static body performance and dynamic body performance; selecting a combination of adhesively bonded seams based upon said ranking; generating a second computer model of said body structure having said combination of adhesively bonded seams; performing a simulation of said second computer model to ensure that said generated second computer model satisfies certain performance requirements; determining whether said second computer model of said body structure is feasible from a manufacturing and cost viewpoint; if said second computer model of said body structure is not feasible from a manufacturing and cost viewpoint, selecting a second combination of adhesively bonded seams based upon said ranking; generating a third computer model of said body structure having said second combination of adhesively bonded seams; performing a simulation of said third computer model of said body structure to ensure that said third computer model satisfies certain performance requirements; and determining whether said third computer model of said body structure is feasible from a manufacturing and cost viewpoint; if said second computer model of said body structure is feasible from a manufacturing and cost viewpoint, performing a full vehicle computer analysis of said second computer model of said body structure; and optimizing said second computer model of said body structure based upon said complete functional computer analysis, said optimized body structure having a reduced weight.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the steps of generating said first and second computer model and performing said full vehicle analysis are performed by use of a computer aided engineering system.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
July 26, 2000
July 20, 2004
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.