Methods for controlling at least two actuators are provided. An internal control system sends an input received from the main control system to a first actuator and diverts a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached. The actuators may be throttle valves for heating a hydraulic line. The internal control system includes a cutoff rerouter for implementing the sending and the diverting of the input and an adaptive cutoff controller, e.g., an integral controller, for determining the input constraint of the first actuator.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: sending an input received from a main electronic control system to a first actuator; and diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached; wherein a size of the diverted portion of the input is equivalent to the difference between the input and the input constraint determined by an adaptive cutoff controller.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the adaptive cutoff controller comprises an integral controller.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the adaptive cutoff controller comprises a PID controller.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the adaptive cutoff controller comprises a recursive least squares system.
5. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: sending an input received from a main control system to a first actuator; and diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached, wherein a size of the diverted portion of the input is equivalent to the difference between the input and the input constraint determined by an adaptive cutoff controller; wherein a signal being fed to the adaptive cutoff controller comprises the input divided by an output from the first actuator.
6. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: sending an input received from a main control system to a first actuator; and diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached; and using a PID controller to decrease the input being fed to the first actuator when an output of the first actuator is greater than a predetermined output constraint of the first actuator; wherein a size of the diverted portion of the input is equivalent to the difference between the input and the input constraint determined by an adaptive cutoff controller.
7. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: sending an input received from a main control system to a first actuator; diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached; and modifying the portion of the input by a transfer function before diverting it to the second actuator.
8. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: sending an input received from a main control system to a first actuator; and diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when an input constraint of the first actuator is reached; wherein the first and second actuators comprise throttle valves for heating a nitrogen line.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the actuators have more than one input constraint.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the actuators are arranged in sequence.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising diverting one or more additional portions of the input to the subsequent actuators in the sequence when input constraints of the respective preceding actuators are reached.
12. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: determining if an input received from a main electronic control system is greater than an input constraint of a first actuator; diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when the input is greater than the input constraint; and sending an undiverted portion of the input to the first actuator.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein a size of the diverted portion of the input is equivalent to the difference between the input and the input constraint of the first actuator.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein a size of the undiverted portion is equivalent to the input constraint of the first actuator.
15. The method of claim 12 further comprising calculating an input/output response slope of the first actuator.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising calculating the input constraint of the first actuator based on the input/output response slope.
17. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: determining if an input received from a main control system is greater than an input constraint of a first actuator; diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when the input is greater than the input constraint; sending an undiverted portion of the input to the first actuator; and determining if an output of the first actuator is greater than a predetermined output constraint of the first actuator.
18. A method of controlling two or more actuators, comprising: determining if an input received from a main control system is greater than an input constraint of a first actuator; diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when the input is greater than the input constraint; sending an undiverted portion of the input to the first actuator; and determining an amount by which to offset the input being fed to the first actuator when the output of the first actuator is greater than the predetermined output constraint of the first actuator.
19. A method of controlling at least two actuators, comprising: determining if an input received from a main electronic control system is greater than an input constraint of a first actuator; diverting a portion of the input to a second actuator when the input is greater than the input constraint; and using an internal electronic control system that receives an input from a main control system to control said first and second actuators such that eigenvalues of the internal control system remain substantially constant during its operation.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
February 8, 2005
October 7, 2008
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.