Patentable/Patents/US-7453604
US-7453604

Systems and methods for estimating an image marking process using scanned image attributes

PublishedNovember 18, 2008
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Inventorsnot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Methods and systems used to automatically identify the marking process used for an image on a substrate based on spatial characteristics and/or color of the image. Image types which are classified and identified include continuous tone images and halftone images. Among halftone images separately identified are inkjet images, xerographic images and lithographic images. Locally adaptive image threshold techniques may be used to determine the spatial characteristics of the image.

Patent Claims
27 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.

1

1. A method of analyzing a printed image, comprising: scanning the printed image; determining spatial characteristics of the printed image; analyzing the spatial characteristics of the printed image; determining spatial variations in the printed image based on the analyzed spatial characteristics; and determining an analog tone or binary image marking process used to create the printed image based on the determined spatial variations in the printed image; wherein determining spatial variations of the printed image includes determining local variations in input data, determining half tone dot periodicity, and determining frequency or noise characteristics; and wherein determining the image marking process does not require obtaining additional spectral information obtained through additional spectral channels, and does not require a power spectrum of the image data.

2

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein spatial variations include local spatial variations of the scanned image data.

3

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a low value of the local spatial variation of the scanned image data is indicative of a photographic image marking process or background noise.

4

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein a high value of the local spatial variation of the scanned image data is indicative of a halftone image marking process.

5

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein spatial variations include at least one of dispersion and periodicity.

6

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein a dispersed spatial variation of the scanned image data is indicative of an inkjet image marking process.

7

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein a clustered spatial variation of the scanned image data is indicative of a xerographic image marking process or an offset image marking process.

8

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein spatial characteristics include at least one of halftone dot periodicity, halftone screen frequency and halftone screen noise.

9

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein a xerographic image marking process has low screen frequency and high screen noise characteristics.

10

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein an offset image marking process has high screen frequency and low screen noise characteristics.

11

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein scanning the printed image comprises dividing scanned printed image into image data blocks.

12

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein scanning the printed image further comprises selecting one or more image data blocks.

13

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing comprises determining one or more of an area average or mean of pixels in an image data block of the scanned printed image, an area variance of the pixels for the image data block, extreme minima value, min a , of the pixels for the image data block, extreme maxima value, max a , of the pixels for the image data block.

14

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the analyzing further comprises one or more of determining a ratio of the area variance to mean determined for a given block, calculating a distribution of the mean values for large pixel areas, comparing the calculated mean value to the determined min a and/or max a values, and determining a distance between maxima/minima.

15

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining an image marking process further comprises setting color attributes for storage, transmission, transformation or reproduction.

16

16. A computer readable medium encoded with computer executable instructions for determining an image marking process used to create a printed image, instructions, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising: scanning the printed image; determining spatial characteristics of the printed image; analyzing the spatial characteristics of the printed image; determining local spatial variations in the printed image based on the analyzed spatial characteristics; and determining an analog tone or binary image marking process used to create the printed image based on the determined local spatial variations in the printed image; wherein determining local spatial variations of the printed image includes determining local variations in input image, determining halftone dot periodicity, and determining frequency or noise characteristics; and wherein determining the image marking process does not require obtaining additional spectral information obtained through additional spectral channels, and does not require a power spectrum of the image data.

17

17. The machine-readable medium according to claim 16 , wherein local spatial variations include dispersion and periodicity.

18

18. The machine-readable medium according to claim 16 , wherein spatial characteristics include halftone dot periodicity, halftone screen frequency and halftone screen noise.

19

19. The machine-readable medium according to claim 18 , wherein the analyzing comprises determining one or more of an area average or mean of pixels in an image data block of the scanned printed image, an area variance of the pixels for the image data block, extreme minima value, min a , of the pixels for the image data block, extreme maxima value, max a , of the pixels for the image data block.

20

20. The machine-readable medium according to claim 19 , wherein the analyzing further comprises one or more of: determining a ratio of the area variance to mean determined for a given block, calculating a distribution of the mean values for large pixel areas, comparing the calculated mean value to the determined min a and/or max a values, and determining a distance between maxima/minima.

21

21. The machine-readable medium according to claim 16 , wherein determining an image marking process further comprises setting color attributes for storage, transmission, transformation or reproduction.

22

22. An image marking process identification system for a printed image, comprising: a memory; and an image marking process identification determination circuit, routine or application that identifies at least one of a media type for the printed image or an image marking process used to process the printed image, by processing the printed image to determine spatial characteristics of the printed image; analyzing the spatial characteristics of the printed image; determining local spatial variations in the printed image based on the analyzed spatial characteristics; and determining an analog tone or binary image marking process used to create the printed image based on the determined local spatial variations in the printed image; wherein determining local spatial variations of the printed image includes determining local variations in input data, determining half tone dot periodicity, and determining frequency or noise characteristics; and wherein determining the image marking process does not require obtaining additional spectral information obtained through additional spectral channels, and does not require a power spectrum of the image data.

23

23. The image marking process identification system according to claim 22 , wherein local spatial variations include dispersion and periodicity.

24

24. The image marking process identification system according to claim 22 , wherein spatial characteristics include halftone dot periodicity, halftone screen frequency and halftone screen noise.

25

25. The image marking process identification system according to claim 22 , wherein the analyzing comprises determining one or more of an area average or mean of pixels in an image data block of the scanned printed image, an area variance of the pixels for the image data block, extreme minima value, min a , of the pixels for the image data block, extreme maxima value, max a , of the pixels for the image data block.

26

26. The image marking process identification system according to claim 25 , the analyzing further comprises one or more of: determining a ratio of the area variance to mean determined for a given block, calculating a distribution of the mean values for large pixel areas, comparing the calculated mean value to the determined min a and/or max a values, and determining a distance between maxima/minima.

27

27. The image marking process identification system according to claim 22 , wherein determining an image marking process further comprises setting color attributes for storage, transmission, transformation or reproduction.

Classification Codes (CPC)

Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

June 30, 2003

Publication Date

November 18, 2008

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “Systems and methods for estimating an image marking process using scanned image attributes” (US-7453604). https://patentable.app/patents/US-7453604

© 2026 Patentable. All rights reserved.

Patentable is a research and drafting-assistant tool, not a law firm, and does not provide legal advice. Documents we generate are drafts for review by a licensed patent attorney.