A method, system, and computer program product for processing traffic tickets is provided. In one embodiment, a department of motor vehicle (DMV) server receives, from a portable law enforcement data processing system via a network, citation data and stores the citation data. The DMV server then determines and notifies a court of jurisdiction of the citation data and receives, via the network, instructions from a client representing an accused about how the accused would like to proceed with the case. Based on the instructions received on behalf of the client, the DMV server modifies the citation data.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A computer implemented method for processing traffic citation data, the computer implemented method comprising: receiving citation data regarding a citation for a vehicle traffic violation from a portable law enforcement data processing system via a network by a first server that manages motor vehicle license data, wherein the citation data includes an identity of an accused; responsive to receiving the citation data, determining by the first server a court having legal jurisdiction by analyzing the citation data; responsive to determining the court having legal jurisdiction, sending the citation data by the first server to a second server that manages court docket information for the court having legal jurisdiction; generating a web page containing the citation data, wherein the web page is accessible via authorized access from a client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused; and responsive to receiving instructions from the court having legal jurisdiction associated with the second server, modifying the citation data, by the first server, based on instructions sent from the client data processing system and based on the instructions from the court having legal jurisdiction.
2. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising: responsive to the accused logging into the first server through the Internet via the client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused, redirecting the client data processing system used by the accused to the second server of the court having legal jurisdiction.
3. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising: responsive to receiving a response from the accused or a representative of the accused by the second server associated with the court having legal jurisdiction, updating the first server by the second server.
4. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: providing the accused with a plurality of options, by the first server; and responsive to a selection being made by the accused or a representative of the accused receiving a selection from the plurality of options.
5. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 4 , wherein the plurality of options includes at least two of paying a fine associated with the citation, setting a court appearance date, and appealing a decision of the court.
6. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 3 , wherein the instructions from the court having legal jurisdiction include at least one of dismissal of the citation, conviction, assessing a fine, setting a new court appearance date, and issuing an arrest warrant.
7. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the citation data is processed through the first server with appropriate notices and updates sent to the second server associated with the court having legal jurisdiction and the client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused.
8. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising: responsive to the modification of the citation data based on the instructions from the court having legal jurisdiction, providing a notice to the accused of the modification to the citation data.
9. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: responsive to receiving the citation data from the first server, updating a court docket associated with the citation by the second server; and responsive to the second server receiving a response from the accused choosing to pay a fine, set a court data, or appear in court to contest the citation, updating the first server by the second server.
10. The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: responsive to an arrest warrant associated with the citation being issued by a presiding judge, sending notification that the arrest warrant has been issued to the second server by the first server.
11. A system for processing traffic tickets, the system comprising: a first receiver of a first server which receives citation data regarding a citation for a vehicle traffic violation from a portable law enforcement data processing system via a network by a first server that manages motor vehicle license data, wherein the citation data includes an identity of an accused; a processor of the first server, wherein the processor analyzes the citation data and determines a court having legal jurisdiction; a notification unit of the first server, wherein the notification unit sends the citation data to a court server that manages court docket information for the court having legal jurisdiction in response to determining the court having legal jurisdiction; a second receiver of the first server which receives, via the network, instructions from a client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused; and a modification unit of the first server which modifies the citation data based on the instructions from the client data processing system and based on instructions received from the court server of the court having legal jurisdiction.
12. The system as recited in claim 11 , further comprising: a redirection unit of the first server which redirects the client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused to the court server associated with the court having legal jurisdiction in response to the accused logging into the first server through the Internet.
13. The system as recited in claim 11 , further comprising: a fourth receiver of the first server, wherein the fourth receiver receives updates from the court server in response to the court server receiving a response from the accused or a representative of the accused.
14. The system as recited in claim 11 , further comprising: an options unit which provides the accused with a plurality of options; and wherein the first receiver receives a selection from the plurality of options made by the accused or a representative of the accused.
15. The system as recited in claim 14 , wherein the plurality of options includes at least two of paying a fine associated with the citation, setting a court appearance date, and appealing a decision of the court.
16. The system as recited in claim 13 , wherein the instructions from the court having legal jurisdiction include at least one of dismissal of the citation, conviction, assessing a fine, setting a new court appearance date, and issuing an arrest warrant.
17. The system as recited in claim 11 , wherein the citation data is processed through the first server with appropriate notices and updates sent to the court server associated with the court having legal jurisdiction and the client data processing system associated with the identity of the accused.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
September 20, 2001
February 23, 2010
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.