Embodiments of the invention provide a method of reading and verifying a tag based on inherent disorder during a manufacturing process. The method includes using a first reader to take a first reading of an inherent disorder feature of the tag, and using a second reader to take a second reading of the inherent disorder feature of the tag. The method further includes matching the first reading with the second reading, and determining one or more acceptance criteria, wherein at least one of the acceptance criteria is based on whether the first reading and the second reading match within a predetermined threshold. If the acceptance criteria are met, then the tag is accepted, and a fingerprint for the tag is recorded. The invention further provides a method of testing and characterizing a reader of inherent disorder tags during a manufacturing process. The method includes taking a reading of a known inherent disorder tag, using the reading to measure a characteristic of the reader, and storing the measured characteristic for use when reading inherent disorder tags.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method comprising: comparing a first reading from a first reader of an inherent disorder feature of a tag with at least a second reading from a second reader of the inherent disorder feature of the tag; comparing a third reading from a third reader of the inherent disorder feature of the tag with the first reading and the second reading; determining whether the tag can be read repeatably based on if the first reading and the second reading match within a predetermined threshold; accepting the tag upon determination that the tag can be read repeatably; and recording, in a database, a fingerprint characterizing the tag if the tag was accepted, varying the conditions for each of the first, second, and third readers, so that readings from each of the first, the second, and the third readers cover a range of conditions within predetermined thresholds.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining one or more acceptance criteria based on an individual reading.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining an acceptance criterion based on the individual reading comprises determining an acceptance criterion based on a strength of a signal in at least one of the first reading and the second reading.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining an acceptance criterion based on the individual reading comprises determining an acceptance criterion based on a complexity of a signal in at least one of the first reading and the second reading.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: rejecting the tag if it is not accepted.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein rejecting the tag comprises removing the tag without stopping production of objects on which the tag is disposed.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein removing the tag comprises one or more of marking the tag as rejected, cutting out the tag, punching out the tag, and removing a tag using a suction method.
8. The method of claim 5 , wherein rejecting the tag further comprises noting the rejected tag in a database.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: comparing, if the first reading and the second reading do not match within the predetermined threshold, a third reading of the inherent disorder of the tag with the first reading and the second reading; accepting the tag if the first reading and the third reading match within the predetermined threshold, or whether the second reading and the third reading match within the predetermined threshold; and recording, in a database, if the tag is accepted, a fingerprint characterizing the tag based on the first reading if the first reading and the third reading match within the predetermined threshold, or based on the second reading if the second reading and the third reading match within the predetermined threshold.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: comparing a third reading of the inherent disorder feature of the tag with the first reading and the second reading; and determining an acceptance criterion based on whether the third reading matches with the first reading or the second reading within the predetermined threshold.
11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: checking the performance of a first reader used for obtaining the first reading, a second reader used for obtaining the second reading, and a third reader used for obtaining the third reading.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein checking the performance of the first reader, the second reader, and the third reader comprises determining if one of the first reader, the second reader, or the third reader provides readings that are different from the other two readers.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is configured to read and verify the tag based on the inherent disorder function during a process of manufacturing the tag.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inherent disorder feature comprises one or more of disorder of fibers within paper, random bubbles within a transparent polymer, randomly distributed quantum dots or nanobarcodes, disordered pattern of magnetic particles, disordered pattern of optically active or optically distinguishable particles, and disordered pattern of conductive or semi-conductive particles.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and the second reading being obtained at one or more of manufacturing, quality control, shipping, and sales process prior to provision, use, and/or verification of the tag by the end user.
16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fingerprint comprises one of the first reading and the second reading, a composite of the first and the second readings, or a computational function of one or more the first reading and the second reading.
17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fingerprint is not recorded in the database unless the tag is accepted.
18. A method comprising: matching a first reading from a first reader of an inherent disorder feature of a tag with at least a second reading from a second reader of the inherent disorder feature of the tag; matching a third reading from a third reader of the inherent disorder feature of the tag with the first reading and the second reading: determining one or more acceptance criteria, wherein at least one of the acceptance criteria is based on whether the first reading and the second reading match within a predetermined threshold; determining whether the tag can be read repeatably based on if the first reading and the second reading match within the predetermined threshold; and varying the conditions for each of the first, second, and third readers, so that readings from each of the first, the second, and the third readers cover a range of conditions within predetermined thresholds.
19. A method comprising: using a first reader to take a first reading of an inherent disorder feature of a tag; using at least a second reader to take at least a second reading of the inherent disorder feature of the tag; matching the first reading with at least the second reading; determining one or more acceptance criteria, wherein at least one of the acceptance criteria is based on whether the first reading and the second reading match within a predetermined threshold; accepting the tag if the acceptance criteria are met; recording a fingerprint for the tag if the tag was accepted; using at least a third reader to take a at least a third reading of the inherent disorder feature of the tag if the acceptance criteria are not met; and varying the conditions for each of the first, second, and third readers, so that readings from each of the first, the second, and the third readers cover a range of conditions within predetermined thresholds.
20. The method of claim 19 , wherein varying the conditions comprises varying at least one of an age of at least one of the readers, temperature conditions for at least one of the readers, construction of at least one of the readers, and components of at least one of the readers.
21. The method of claim 19 , wherein varying the conditions comprises varying the conditions to cover an expected range of conditions for readers that will be used in a field.
22. The method of claim 19 , wherein varying the conditions comprises offsetting the first, second, and third readers from each other.
23. The method of claim 22 , wherein offsetting the first, second, and third readers from each other comprises offsetting each of the first, second, and third readers from each other by a constant offset.
24. The method of claim 23 , further comprising using false acceptance rate and false rejection rate tolerances to determine the constant offset.
25. The method of claim 23 , further comprising using the constant offset to determine a minimum number of readers to be used in a production line.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
December 16, 2011
March 22, 2016
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.