The content rendering capability of web browsers can be tested and compared across different web browsers. Testing with respect to restricted content is enabled utilizing a web browser to facilitate authentication. State information acquired by the web browser from a server can be employed to request restricted content for rendering by a number of target web browsers sought to be tested. Subsequently, representations of the restricted content produced by target web browsers can be rendered to a multi-browser display environment, for example.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection, as filed with the USPTO.
1. A method of facilitating testing, comprising: employing at least one processor configured to execute computer-executable instructions stored in memory to perform the following acts: receiving an address of content to test multi-browser consistency; invoking a first web browser with the address of the content; receiving authentication information in the first web browser in response to a login request received by the first web browser from a server in place of the content; receiving state information from the server in response to transmission of valid authentication information to the server by a first web browser; requesting content from the server directly, without using a browser, with the state information, and a browser identifier of a second web browser, different from the first web browser, wherein the browser identifier identifies a web browser with which content will be rendered; receiving the content, specific to the second browser, from the server; and rendering a representation of the content, rendered by a second web-browser engine, in a multi-browser display environment configured to display a plurality of representations of content rendered by different web-browser engines in a single user interface.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprises saving the authentication information.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprises retrieving the authentication information from a data store.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprises: submitting the content received in response to the request to a remote web browser engine; and receiving the representation of the content rendered by the remote web browser engine.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprise receiving a cookie saved by the first web browser that encapsulates the state information and submitting the cookie with a request for content from the server for the second web browser.
6. The method of claim 4 further comprises receiving a browser image as the representation of the content as rendered by the remote web browser engine.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprises sending the browser identifier as part of a user-agent string in a hypertext transport protocol header.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprises sending the browser identifier comprising a browser name and version.
9. A system of facilitating testing, comprising: a processor coupled to a memory, the processor configured to execute the following computer-executable components stored in the memory: a acquisition component that acquires state information provided by a web server in response to successful authentication with the web server associated with procurement of restricted content by a first web browser; a content acquisition component that requests the restricted content specific to a second web browser, different from the first web browser, with the state information and a browser identifier of the second web browser that identifies a web browser with which content will be rendered; and a rendering component that renders images of the restricted content as displayed by the first web browser and the second web browser in a single display environment.
10. The system of claim 9 , the browser identifier is a user-agent string in a hypertext transport protocol header.
11. The system of claim 9 further comprises a web browser component that accepts user identification information and acquires the state information.
12. The system of claim 11 , the web browser component is further configured to enable navigation and selection of the restricted content.
13. The system of claim 11 further comprises a storage component that stores the state information.
14. The system of claim 9 , the second web browser is a remote browser.
15. The system of claim 9 , acquired state information is encapsulated in a cookie saved by the first web browser.
16. The system of claim 9 , the browser identifier comprises a browser name and version.
17. A computer-readable storage device having instructions stored thereon that enable at least one processor to perform a method upon execution, the method comprising: employing a first web browser to authenticate a user on a web server and identify content available on the web server after authentication; acquiring a set of one or more cookies received by the first web browser from the web server without intercepting the set of one or more cookies from network traffic; determining a browser identifier associated with a browser selected by a user for testing; requesting the content from the web server with the set of one or more cookies and the browser identifier of a second web browser, different from the first web browser, wherein the browser identifier identifies a browser with which content will be rendered; receiving the content, specific to the second web browser, from the web server; employing a web browser engine for the second web browser to render the content; and rendering an image produced by the web browser engine to a multi-browser display environment configured to enable display of a plurality of representations of content rendered by different web-browser engines in a single user interface.
18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , the method further comprises saving the set of one or more cookies.
19. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , the method further comprises employing the web browser engine at a remote location.
20. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17 , determining an identifier comprises determining a user-agent string in a hypertext transport protocol.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
April 8, 2011
May 2, 2017
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.